Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. man killed by police in mistaken identity (Trigger Happy Cop)
AP, via Yahoo! News ^ | October 29, 2008 | AP

Posted on 10/29/2008 5:06:39 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: American_Centurion

~chuckle~


41 posted on 10/29/2008 6:21:22 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

This cop is going to prison and his employer is going to be paying a lot of money.

A cop is not permitted to shoot at a fleeing felon unless that felon poses an immediate threat to other individuals. Suspected burglers do not fit that exception. See Garner v. Tennessee, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)


42 posted on 10/29/2008 6:23:18 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
if anyone "comes" at an officer with a weapon and the officer feels he is at imminent risk of SPI/death, he would be justified in using deadly physical force. i don't care who owns the house.

an officer is not obligated to give verbal commands. only if it is possible.

43 posted on 10/29/2008 6:24:12 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact i DID only read the excerpt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
A cop is not permitted to shoot at a fleeing felon unless that felon poses an immediate threat to other individuals. Suspected burglers do not fit that exception. See Garner v. Tennessee, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)

Now wait a minute! The officers uniform likely became wrinkled or even got some dirt on it when he ran into the property owner. That's assault, ask ANY cop.

44 posted on 10/29/2008 6:27:16 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
To: Admin Moderator .... I didnt ask you. ..... 37 posted on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:19:06 AM by VaBthang4

Suicide by Moderator?

VaBthang4 .... Since Jul 13, 2001 .... This account has been banned or suspended.

45 posted on 10/29/2008 6:29:10 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

~grin~


46 posted on 10/29/2008 6:29:39 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
You got your response. Ponder it.

The response in question was abusive, yet you are still citing it. Leave this thread, since you ain't getting the message.

47 posted on 10/29/2008 6:31:45 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

So would such justify ME shooting the officer in this case?

I’m investigating, on my property, a possible burglary and a cop, which I don’t recognize as a cop, runs around the corner in the dark and runs into me. I get up and see him drawing down, no verbal order, but I shoot first and he falls dead.


48 posted on 10/29/2008 6:32:08 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Haha, okay.


49 posted on 10/29/2008 6:32:41 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

Is that you, Walter Mitty?


50 posted on 10/29/2008 6:33:24 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

He ain’t suspended.


51 posted on 10/29/2008 6:34:01 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
that is why cops were pretty uniforms and shiny badges. here's a question: look at the photo of the kid on the website.

then imagine him bursting through the front door coming at you with a firearm. a family member said he was defending his home. might he have had a gun on him?

and these 'burglars' were interviewed and released which makes me think this was not a burgalry. it was a personal beef of some sort that went bad.

could be wrong. not enough info.

52 posted on 10/29/2008 6:36:19 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact i DID only read the excerpt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
To: Admin Moderator ..... I didnt ask you. .... 37 posted on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:19:06 AM by VaBthang4

*****

Suicide by Moderator?

VaBthang4 .... Since Jul 13, 2001 .... This account has been banned or suspended.

45 posted on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:29:10 AM by Polybius

*****

To: Polybius
~grin~

46 posted on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:29:39 AM by VaBthang4

*****


53 posted on 10/29/2008 6:43:43 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
an officer is not obligated to give verbal commands. only if it is possible.

The story doesn't say whether the victim was holding anything that the cop could have been mistaken for a gun or if he felt that the victim was rushing him in the dark. Just too much missing info to assume the cop is guilty of a deliberate crime.

Innocent until proven guilty still stands. It's shamefull that some on the right behave toward police exactlty the same way the far left behaves toward our soldiers.
54 posted on 10/29/2008 6:45:17 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
...then imagine him bursting through the front door coming at you with a firearm. a family member said he was defending his home. might he have had a gun on him?

and these 'burglars' were interviewed and released which makes me think this was not a burgalry. it was a personal beef of some sort that went bad.

And you can suppose all of that because he's a black kid with his hat on sideways?

55 posted on 10/29/2008 6:46:41 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; Red in Blue PA
I honor and respect all those brave men and women who wear a badge and enforce the law. I also hold them to very high standards...the same standards that I am held to as a CCW permit holder.

I expect them to be subject to exactly the same penalties that I am subject to if I were to mistakenly shoot some young unarmed man in his own yard.

Would I be given a pass on that? No.

56 posted on 10/29/2008 6:47:47 AM PDT by Sender (Never lose your ignorance; you can never regain it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion
huh. doesnt look black to me. but if a cop is called to a 'burglary', gets to the address and a youth who matches the script comes out of the front door with a weapon...

i'm just saying i'll hold judgement until facts come out. the main thing i want to know is weapon status, officer in uniform?, script of the perps.

57 posted on 10/29/2008 6:52:15 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact i DID only read the excerpt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Well, if thats the case we need to put LEO’s on a short leash.


58 posted on 10/29/2008 7:09:51 AM PDT by DariusBane (I've got a bracelet too :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
doesnt look black to me

You need glasses. Blow that smoke elsewhere.

59 posted on 10/29/2008 7:17:11 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

huh. i always thought the criminals should be the ones on short leashes.


60 posted on 10/29/2008 7:17:14 AM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact i DID only read the excerpt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson