No that's National Review's Kathleen Parker.
National Review should really stop promoting Mitt as strongly as they've been allowed to do during this general election. I think Rich Lowrey knows better.
Mitt's involvement in this campaign isn't coming into question. It's his staff (e.g. Kevin Madden) that has pushed anti-Palin stories to a red-meat-hungry press. Mitt should distance himself from them. Read here: http://redgirlrising.blogdns.net/romney-moles/
Thanks for clearing that up...much appreciated.
Those are the last two people that I would think of. Wow.
Interesting use of words. You use "his staff" seeming to indicate that a bunch of former Romney supporters are involved but then indicate that its only Kevin Madden you are talking about. Then you say "anti-Palin" stories as if there are many that Mr. Madden has put out there and yet, I can only find the one criticism from his CNN interview. And even there, the criticism, by any reasonable standard, is minor.
So, I do have to wonder about your choice of words. Making the allegation of a wide-ranging conspiracy based on a single man's (a man who is working FOR the McCain/Palin campaign, by the way) minor critique is something I have come to expect from the Left and its buddies in the media. So, coming back to my main point: wouldn't your energies be better and more constructively directed towards Barak Obama, a clear, direct and present danger to the very political foundations of our country?