Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Times no longer has a Washington bureau (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Poynter Online ^ | November 1, 2008 | Jim Romenesko

Posted on 11/01/2008 1:33:21 PM PDT by abb

This is a memo from a Los Angeles Times staffer to eight colleagues. At the source's request, I've deleted names

Sent: Fri 10/31/2008 2:29 PM From: [Name removed] To: [Names removed] Subject: The worst yet: Tea with Doyle [McManus, LAT DC bureau chief]

Gang, Well, let’s just say it's bad in every way it can be bad. Basically, the LAT no longer has a Washington bureau and we will be under the control of the Tribune Co., much like McClatchy is run. The much-touted 3-man committee was basically used to vote the LAT down 2-1 every time. The formal announcement will be made on Nov. 7, people will be informed they will be laid off on the 18th, and the new bureau begins on the 19th. Numbers are still fudgey, but 8 LAT layoffs seems to be the working number.

At the end of the session, Doyle basically put it simply: This was a well-orchestrated corporate campaign to sever the Washington bureau from the LAT. He appeared quite sheepish, since in hindsight this was all pretty clear...as he noted, Zell's rant in Feb. has pretty much come true. "It's not the LAT that is running this process. That has become increasingly clear."

Doyle said Tom McCarthy will not be the bureau chief, and it's unclear if he's going to want to stay in the new organization, which is still being worked out. Tom was the only person who didn't join us in the conference room. Doyle doesn't know who the new bureau chief will be, though Cissy Baker's name keeps getting mentioned. Some guy (gal?) named Kerry something, the national editor of the ChiTrib, has been mentioned, but Kerry claims he's heard no such thing.

The structure is basically going to be the same as McClatchy: 19 reporters & 5 editors as a core "national staff" 10 reporters as "regional reporters", divided this way: 2 from LAT 2 from ChiTrib 2 from BaltSun 1 from other small papers

...Schmitt asked whether decisions on who is staying were really made on merit. Doyle acknowledged that they weren’t. Basically Russ/Gerry/Gremillon came up with a list of beats, then moved reporters into slots. "The names that were left over were left over." He said the people making the decision largely were making judgments about "people they don't know and who’s work they've never read." Doyle added that the decisions were "somewhat arbitrary."

Schmitt then asked why they couldn't say who was going to be laid off, and Doyle said he'd been forbidden from telling people. Asked why, Doyle said, "Basically, to be inhumane." He said corporate types don’t want to have to answer questions from people who are laid off, so announcing layoffs on the 18th was the most pain-free for them. Though he also noted that the LAT is telegraphing these, and if you want to talk in any more detail, Tom & Doyle will likely tell you what your future is. If you're not on the list, and you want to volunteer to leave, it would be good to tell Doyle by Nov. 13, so he can fill your spot with another LAT body.

I asked some questions about how the LAT leadership feels about no longer having a DC bureau, and he said they were upset. I tried to press him on whether this means we no longer have any protection from L.A., and he basically said that's the case. We’re run by Chicago, though he said if Chicago really wanted to make the DC bureau any smaller, they could have done it this time (though he also noted that the only place the LAT won anything at all in this discussion was preventing Chicago from making the bureau even smaller).

So as I said: bad, bad, bad in every way. Everyone came out shell shocked.

Enjoy your weekend!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: dbm; lat; latimes; layoffs; newspapers; tribune
Saturday afternoon good news.
1 posted on 11/01/2008 1:33:22 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


2 posted on 11/01/2008 1:34:12 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

3 posted on 11/01/2008 1:34:32 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

When a major paper closes their D.C. bureau they may as well just take down the entire thing.


4 posted on 11/01/2008 1:34:54 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDy7vn7-LX4

Sam Zell says “f—k you” to one of his reporters.


5 posted on 11/01/2008 1:35:20 PM PDT by WilliamReading
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Well, they COULD sell a lot of papers and get a lot of interest if thy would release that tape they are holding! I guess they’d rather be DEAD *AND* RED!


6 posted on 11/01/2008 1:35:57 PM PDT by RocketMan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

If you act like a real newspaper, then maybe you’ll get treated like a real newspaper.


7 posted on 11/01/2008 1:38:24 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Damn no Washington DC buerau damn we Freepers are good LOL!


8 posted on 11/01/2008 1:38:31 PM PDT by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RocketMan1
Well, they COULD sell a lot of papers and get a lot of interest if thy would release that tape they are holding! I guess they’d rather be DEAD *AND* RED!

And yours is well said :-)

9 posted on 11/01/2008 1:38:45 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb; All

Note to reporters:

Hahahahaha!

Go out and get USEFUL jobs now, IF YOU HAVE ANY SKILLS BESIDES LYING!!!


10 posted on 11/01/2008 1:39:08 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (USMC- Guarding freedom around the world since 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RocketMan1
Exactly.

Think of the sales the LA Times would have if they released an exclusive paper about the video, and then sold the video itself to Fox News for several million.

But noooooooo!!

The LA Times people have to be good little communists, and protect their Stalinist thug Odinga Hussein Obama.

11 posted on 11/01/2008 1:39:37 PM PDT by Prole (Please pray for the families of Chris and Channon. May God always watch over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hey, L A Mimes before you close down, release the video.


12 posted on 11/01/2008 1:48:01 PM PDT by Know et al (Everything I know I read in the newspaper and that's the reason for my ignorance: Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Let me know when they drop their San Fernando Valley bureau.
Then I’ll start celebrating.
Close the rag and throw the liberal writers in the gutter where they belong.


13 posted on 11/01/2008 1:54:17 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RocketMan1
Well, they COULD sell a lot of papers and get a lot of interest if thy would release that tape they are holding!

Here's what I don't understand - the LA Times has already done one story based on the tape.

Why not two?

It's hard to believe the person who gave them the tape for the first story had the wit to realize many years later it would be relevant again.

I understand the granted request about not releasing the actual tape - and if they gave their word, they should keep it. But there's no way they can't write another story about the tape.

14 posted on 11/01/2008 1:55:09 PM PDT by GOPJ (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

Why bother? They can make up all the bad news about Republicans that’s fit to print right in LA!


15 posted on 11/01/2008 1:58:40 PM PDT by Jagman (Don't tax me, bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Well LA Times.....bye!


16 posted on 11/01/2008 1:59:14 PM PDT by FrankR (When Obama Raises TAXES, Employers will sharpen AXES. - Frank R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
And this answers the question why this LAT does not release the Obama tape.
Quite simple, the Trib. says no to prevent endangering Obama’s ascension.
Axelrod, Obama’s campaign manager and former Trib local editor has his say, same as during the time he plowed the terrain for Obama when publishing divorce records on Obama’s opponent Ryan while running for the Senate.
It's Chicago powerhouse politics transferred onto the national scene.
Reporters kicked off the plane... just wait, you haven't seen anything yet.
17 posted on 11/01/2008 2:04:29 PM PDT by hermgem (Will Olmr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hermgem

you nailed it...

Thank god we still have the API to help us out!!! :P


18 posted on 11/01/2008 2:12:48 PM PDT by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abb

Bye, now.


19 posted on 11/01/2008 2:14:31 PM PDT by Interesting Times (For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

It may be that all these laid off marxists from the newspaper industry land on their feet in government job in an Obama administration.


20 posted on 11/01/2008 2:18:45 PM PDT by MovementConservative (Do everything you can in your precinct; phone bank, door to door, donate food or $... just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hermgem

Agreed...for Obama/Soros to do what they want to do they will need control of the media. Talk Radio will be gone, so will opposition tv and newspapers...be interesting to see what they try to do with the net...bet it will be some kind of congressional/FCC oversight...we will be responsible for opinions...I mean legally.


21 posted on 11/01/2008 2:20:54 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abb

Everyone of them is a Gore voter so I really dont care how bad it was/is for any of them. Sorry.


22 posted on 11/01/2008 2:34:30 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Just die already, you turds.


23 posted on 11/01/2008 2:46:52 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The Times, they are a changin’...


24 posted on 11/01/2008 2:51:20 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamReading

Bias = Layoffs. I just hope Sam doesn’t lose his shirt before his employees figure that out.


25 posted on 11/01/2008 3:01:48 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

They could release a transcript of the tape with no harm done at all to their source.

That indicates conclusively it’s not protecting their source they’re worried about, it’s what those attending the dinner were saying.


26 posted on 11/01/2008 3:22:18 PM PDT by JennysCool (Internet Powerhouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: abb

“We’re run by Chicago.” Yes, we may all soon have that experience.

Imagine what it will be like for the Federal government to be run by the most notoriously corrupt and thuggish political machine in the United States.


27 posted on 11/01/2008 3:25:20 PM PDT by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

“We’re run by Chicago.” Yes, we may all soon have that experience.

Imagine what it will be like for the Federal government to be run by the most notoriously corrupt and thuggish political machine in the United States.


28 posted on 11/01/2008 3:26:10 PM PDT by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Might as well kick them off the 0bama plane, right? Oh wait...


29 posted on 11/01/2008 3:30:51 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Lord please bless our nation with John McCain as president and Sarah Palin as Vice President! Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

This just means that they’ll be manufacturing the news close to home, business as usual. Of course, it’s always good news when one of the Jurassic Times orginazations makes cuts like this.


30 posted on 11/01/2008 4:15:49 PM PDT by theymakemesick (0bama - the calico candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Agreed...for Obama/Soros to do what they want to do they will need control of the media. Talk Radio will be gone, so will opposition tv and newspapers...be interesting to see what they try to do with the net...bet it will be some kind of congressional/FCC oversight...we will be responsible for opinions...I mean legally.
As long as the Kennedy court (i.e., 4 on each side and Kennedy in the middle, so that whatever Kennedy decides is how SCOTUS rules) sits- and so long as the court is not intimidated by fascist threats by the Executive branch - the Fairness Doctrine will not pass muster.

31 posted on 11/02/2008 11:48:36 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

You are much more optimistic than I am.....the Dems blame Talk Radio and Fox for their defeats in ‘94, ‘00 and ‘04...they will go after these outlets without letup.

I thought Heller would win 7-2 last spring...it only survived 5-4. One more appointment and free speech could be about over.


32 posted on 11/05/2008 1:20:08 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson