Posted on 11/01/2008 2:35:45 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
November 5th: Ending date of the Freeper Boomer generation.
"Some animals are more equal than others..."
A reporter for Gay News 9 filing her nails while a patriot speaks! I’m shocked, I tell ya, shocked!
Maybe it is a BFD, if we are supposed to believe her when she files her report on the rally. But then again we all know that it is already written don't we?
Fair & Balanced news. We’ll tell you what to think...we have a journalism degree.
I don't mean to be a total jerk, but the job of a reporter is to REPORT the story, which means that the reporter first has to get out and learn the story.
If the television personality in question is just waiting for the "lights, camera, action" cue, then the personality isn't a "reporter", but rather is what the British would call a "news reader".
PS: Note that Carol Minn Vacca's offical title at Bay News 9 is "Reporter".
PPS: And please also note that Carol Minn Vacca got her start in politics in the employ of the DEM voter fraud champion, Roy Barnes.
With all respect, you sound like you have no idea what the TV news business is all about.
If there is nothing going on, there is nothing to report. Thats really the problem with the 24 hour news cycle.
When the politician is speaking, what exactly is the reporter supposed to do? Especially when they’ve heard the same speech 40 times in the last week. If you think you’d sit there and “report” you are mistaken.
Also, if she is waiting for the “live shot” what is it she should be doing?
While I do not disagree that most of the media has a liberal bias, you are making assumptions about the basic aspects of the job that the public rarely sees. Just because a reporter takes a break when there is nothing new happening, don’t jump all over her.
She's a local reporter, not a national reporter - this is the first time she's ever heard the speech.
If there is nothing going on, there is nothing to report.
I'm quite confident [knowing absolutely nothing about the town a priori] that this is the biggest thing which has happened to New Port Richey in a decade or more.
If Sarah Palin's visit and the thousands of people who came to hear her speak aren't a phenomenon worth studying [moreso, say, than the filing of one's own fingernails], then what on earth is a phenomenon worth studying?
With all respect, you sound like you have no idea what the TV news business is all about.
And, again, with all due respect, you seem to be describing the job of "NEWS READER" rather than the job of "REPORTER".
A reporter would be taking notes and writing copy and interviewing people in the crowd and paying attention and scrutinizing and analyzing and trying to figure out the zeitgeist of the thing, whereas an arrogant, elitist, self-absorbed news reader would be filing her nails waiting for the next "lights, camera, action" cue to read someone else's copy off the teleprompter.
Unfortunately, it is worthless trying to have a conversation with someone who is unwilling to open their minds just a little bit to the experience of someone who has been there.
It would probably be a shock to know that newspaper photographers don't always stay to the end of a football game, after they have gotten "the shot." Local, National, doesnt matter. If they have written the story and its going to fill the 30 second slot, they dont have to go out and "report" any more. This isnt newspaper reporting and it isn't writing books.
You've watched too many movies. Local TV folks do not do a lot of investigative reporting. Or in depth reporting. They go to the event, get a minutes worth of tape and go on the air. If they are going live, they need to stand around for a while waiting for the newscast to come to them.
For a local reporter, these things are a nightmare because they and their crews are relegated to the worst positions and they are treated like rookies by the national press. AND, they have to put up with crap from folks like you who do not know what you are talking about.
In mathematics, they would call it quod erat demonstrandum.
To be fair, the photo was taken before any of the speeches began. The photo was dark and grainy because it was early twighlight hours.
Having said that; her attitude did not improve during the rally. I was standing near the press platform, I tried to read the body language of the reporters as the various speakers presented. None of them looked very enthused about any of the events (sadly,especially the invocation and prayer).
I took the photo because I thought her attitude and disinterest was tacky. It's interesting, perhaps telling, but no surprise and no great scandal in my opinion.
I give up. You are right. The reporters should be out in the crowds running around asking the same question to every person there. They should be on the air every second of the day.
As someone that not only married one of those reporters, but who makes their living working with those people, I should quit and go back to school. Evidently I dont know what I am doing.
I bow to your superior knowledge and experience.
Good luck and good night. In the end, we will vote for the same person, and I guess thats all that matters.
In fairness to Ms. Macca Vin, Sarah Palin had not even arrived when that photo was taken, so she was not expressing any boredom or disrespect toward Palin. Ms. Macca Vin had to wait for four hours for Palin to arrive — that’s when the photo was taken. To be sure, most of the media is in the tank for Obama, but this photo does not portray media bias, just the amount of down time that reporters spend waiting for the candidates to show up. So it’s unfair to single Ms. Macca Vin out as the face of media bias. We need to remember that these are real people with feelings; let’s not sink to the level of the Left.
I’ve never posted here before so this comment is not directed to Vermont Lt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.