Posted on 11/05/2008 6:30:07 AM PST by Triple
We need a grassroots plan to make sure the courts properly review Obama's eligibility as soon as possible.
A few lawsuits can be easily ignored, however 10,000 lawsuits cannot.
The proposal:
Send a clear message to the courts by the sheer number of lawsuits that the matter of eligibility cannot be taken lightly, or dismissed on technicalities.
Step 1:
Have an attorney post on this thread a simple process for individuals to file suit. (including sample filings.)
Step 3:
Individuals concerned about the eligibility of the president elect file suit
Step 3:
Grassroots/individual reports on progress posted to this thread
Step 4:
Repeat until we get 10,000 suits filed across the entire United States of America.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Freeper attorneys - help us out.
It was posted last week that 24 electors will challenge Obamas eligibility in court. If they don’t have standing, no one does.
get a life
I would also like to see the ‘Logan Act’ thrown at him for his past conduct in Pakistan and Iraq.
Lawsuits MUST be filed in all 50 states plus the District of Columbia. Someone MUST figure out who has legal “standing” to file the lawsuits. Otherwise, this is a gigantic waste of effort.
The individual states’ Election Boards must prove and certify that Obama was constitutionally eligible.
We need to move beyond the pettiness and focus on rebuilding the conservative movement. Lawsuits don’t win mandates from the American people.
If you disagree, why waste the bandwidth to say so? You won’t change anyone’s mind. And certainly not the 24 electors that intend to file.
You do realize that if successfully challenged, we will have President Joe ‘Rhetorical Flourishes’ Biden?
Be very careful what you wish for...
Presidential eligibility is not petty. Defending The Constitution is not petty.
Really....Is Biden better?
“We need to move beyond the pettiness and focus on rebuilding the conservative movement. “
You are calling the United States Constitution “petty” and are trying to say you are a “conservative”?? NO conservative ever thinks of the Constitution as petty.
I was thinking that, since the judge ruled that Berg didn’t have standing (as a US citizen? right...),
that the only people that WOULD have standing would be the electors.
So then we get Pres. Joe Biden!
Someone needs to demand that the judiciary state who has standing.
The Constitutional question is if someone that was ineligible ran for Prez, would his running mate take office? Or does it throw the whole election askew?
We can argue over technicalities all day long. What we cannot ignore is 7 million more Americans voted for him than our guy.
I thought the same thing. And Constitutionally, this has never come up before. It’s new ground.
The rules are there for a purpose. If we don't follow them, how can we honestly expect others to?
At least there should be some ballot iniative to have a pres. candidate have to produce their birth certificate to be put on the ballot in a state.
Are you suggesting that we ignore the Constitution?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.