Posted on 11/06/2008 10:33:31 AM PST by DestinyEagle
No; but your house will be redecorated against your will.
And gals (or whatever). We had a gay bar in our 'hood. Started as a C&W bar but went gay somewhere along the line. The neighborhood hated it because of the violence in the parking lot and surrounding alley ways every freaking weekend.
They finally got it closed down - a local Salvadoran restaurant that was being displaced by road construction bought it. It seems to be a family place now, haven't tried it yet.
Most people mistakenly believe that flamers are “wussies”. They aren’t.If this escalates, there will be some surprises for most of the population. Let’s hope it’s eye opening and attitude changing.
they sort of prove their own lack of value to the future of society via their own conduct.
I think this stems from the fact that the arguments PRESENTLY in front of the Calif. SC were done BEFORE the issue went to the voters.
They are counting on the notion the Judges were hoping NOT to have to kick out the referendum and have the voters validate their fiat imposing homosexual marriage on the state. (see the voters agree with the court)
Now the people have rejected the court opinion. TWICE. what will the court do? what will it mean to the courts if they now overide the people TWICE.
They can only set aside via PROCEDURE not constitutionality.
Of course the conduct of the homosexuals in response only diminishes their effort to “normalize” their sexual conduct.
well NO..not my house. Not if I am home. just see my Tagline.
Molon Labe.
California was supposed to be an easy path to the 9th circuit court of appeals for full faith and credit on the rest of the states.What is stopping them from doing so with the "marriages" in Massachussetts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.