Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Jamie Gorelick Won’t Get To Be AG
cashill.com ^ | 11/13/2008 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 11/13/2008 8:37:28 PM PST by Sioux-san

This week in its series, “The New Team,” The New York Times profiles Jamie Gorelick, (pronounced Guh-REH-lick), very possibly America’s next attorney general.

In the way of “baggage,” reporter Eric Lichtblau cites her past employment as vice chairwoman at Fannie Mae and her role in creating the famed intelligence “wall” while deputy attorney general under Clinton.

Lichtblau may not be aware, however, of her most significant contribution to American security, or lack of the same, the one that put her in position to earn what the Times reports as “$25.6 million in salary and other compensation from 1998 to 2003” at Fannie Mae.

Nor does Lichtblau suggest that something other than patriotism may well have inspired her to leave her lucrative post at Fannie Mae to sign on as one of only five Democrats on the 9/11 commission.

In the way of background, Gorelick assumed the deputy AG position in 1994 a month after Clinton crony Webster Hubbell resigned from the Justice Department in disgrace.

Like Hubbell, Gorelick served as the “political officer” in the 100-thousand employee department, the eyes and ears of the administration, the one who could be trusted. Her boss, Janet Reno, an unreliable figurehead, could not.

An article in the June 3, 1996, Newsweek, described, for instance, how Gorelick had set up a “campaign-like war room” in her office because “in a campaign year, Justice can't afford to be totally blind.”

Six weeks later, on July 17, 1996 –two days before the start of the Atlanta Olympics –TWA Flight 800 blew up off the south coast of Long Island, killing all 230 people on board.

(Excerpt) Read more at cashill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho2008; bhoag; gorelick; obama

1 posted on 11/13/2008 8:37:28 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Gore Lick should be in jail or at least publicaly shunned. How she can walk around DC and be taken seriously is beyond me.


2 posted on 11/13/2008 8:41:41 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

you’ve just defined our democrat-socialists!


3 posted on 11/13/2008 8:58:14 PM PST by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

And here, after reading the title, I expected to see the words “incompetent, “corrupt” or at least “cretin” in this article!


4 posted on 11/13/2008 9:00:44 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Cashill is the man. BUMP!

OF COURSE, Gorelick could never hold any named position in the 0bama administration - - even a steaming pantload like 0bama knows a losing political proposition when it kicks him in the Biden, and he certainly knows that Gorelick has the blood of at least three-thousand Americans on her hands - - but that won’t stop her from being given some role or another.

Then again, it all depends on Republican Senators having the spine to call her out should she actually get nominated for something and appear at hearings. And depending on Republicans to have any guts these days seems to be a losing proposition of its own.


5 posted on 11/13/2008 9:02:02 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

If Gorelick helped keep a terrorist incident in 1996 from causing Clinton any political harm, all the more reason Obama would want her in the AG job, to limit the fallout from any incidents that may occur after he releases the terrorists at Gitmo and dismantles as much as possible of the Bush administration’s terrorism-fighting techniques. The Democrats don’t really believe in the War on Terror—they think it’s just a con game by the Bush administration to accumulate power.


6 posted on 11/13/2008 9:02:54 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

I agree. It seems that Jamie Gorelick reached the top rung of the Peter Principle back in the early 1990’s, but miraculously, she keeps getting higher pay and more responsibility as time goes on. It’s hard to see how one person could do so much damage to so many people. Her rise reveals just how insular and corrupt Washington D.C. and the network of Clinton cronies is. In my opinion, the most damaging legacy of the Clinton Administration is the third rate people that he employed. In 2008 we have the spectacle of watching Stephanapoulis interviewing Emmanuel, discussing consideration of Gorelick and Hillary Clinton appointments. None of these people should be anywhere near positions of power as they’ve displayed highly flawed judgement at best and a high degree of malice.


7 posted on 11/13/2008 9:18:15 PM PST by purplelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
Like Hubbell, Gorelick served as the “political officer” in the 100-thousand employee department, the eyes and ears of the administration, the one who could be trusted. Her boss, Janet Reno, an unreliable figurehead, could not.

The term is "Political Commissar".

8 posted on 11/13/2008 9:31:07 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Gorelick CANNOT be confirmed as AG ... until her SPECIAL PROSCECUTOR has had their hearing!


9 posted on 11/13/2008 9:33:11 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (HITLER offered Hope and Change!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Bump for Fri. reading


10 posted on 11/13/2008 9:45:53 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

I have had a feeling all along that Obama’s AG will be our Democrat Governor from Arizona... Janet Napalitano... I Really don’t want that for our country, but even I would say she would have to be a better choice than Gorelick and if it happens the positive for Arizona would be that she is gone and we get the Republican Secretary of State Jan Brewer to replace her.


11 posted on 11/13/2008 9:47:25 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Pray that Obama nominates her. Remember Carter’s first 100 days?


12 posted on 11/13/2008 9:49:13 PM PST by montag813 (www.FreepShop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
"I'm Jamie Gorelick and I approve of this disaster."


13 posted on 11/13/2008 10:05:37 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

It doesn’t matter what she did in the past; if the Messiah wants her to be AG, she will be AG. How dare you question anything the Messiah wants? The media and the majority of the voting public are in a stupor of “Obama can do nothing wrong in our eyes”. They are in a crazed hypnotized obedience to this man, and if he says Gorelick will be the next AG, she will be.


14 posted on 11/13/2008 10:26:41 PM PST by hawkeye101 (DO NOT READ THIS TAGLINE. WHY DID YOU READ THIS? I TOLD YOU NOT TO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

I’m with Cashill. The RATS may love her, but they dont want to deal with her baggage.


15 posted on 11/13/2008 10:27:48 PM PST by freespirited (Honk to indict the MSM for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
The term is "Political Commissar".

Or, in the military, "zampolit"...

the infowarrior

16 posted on 11/13/2008 10:50:14 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

She also had a hand in a quick decision on the Oklahoma City Bombing. IT is all in Jayna Davis’s book, The Third Terrorist.


17 posted on 11/13/2008 10:57:43 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

I wanted to see it because we would get rid of her and next in line is a Republican so AZ would once again have a GOP Governor.


18 posted on 11/13/2008 10:59:39 PM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Keep this woman out of any responsible job.

Anything she touches goes fecal.


19 posted on 11/14/2008 4:11:49 AM PST by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

NO FAIR - I want the Messiah to choose my Governatrix, Jennifer Granholm - she has presided over one of the strongest single-State recession while all the other States were doing fine - please, Obama, take her.......


20 posted on 11/14/2008 6:06:22 AM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

Janet is not far behind in spending programs. After the Bush tax cuts, We had a 2 bil. surplus 2 years ago when she ran for re-election and now we have nearly a 2 bil. deficit.


21 posted on 11/14/2008 3:20:20 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

I am starting to get really paranoid. All of this craziness (federal & state govt’s gone wild) seems rather intentional - gotta bring her all down so that America can be rebuilt into the new USSA - United Socialists States of America. Then I’d have to move somewhere that would actually want to secede. It sure won’t be welfare Michigan.


22 posted on 11/14/2008 3:28:30 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
The Democrats don’t really believe in the War on Terror—they think it’s just a con game by the Bush administration to accumulate power.

That's what they've wanted us to believe since 9/11.

However, if they need a "Remember The Maine!" moment, Obama's New Government Media will haul out footage of the Twin Towers jumpers faster than you can say spit.

You'll see the fireballs and hear the recorded screams more times than you can count, if they need us to dance like puppets on a string. Mark my words.

This is possible because the Republicans can no longer gain any political advantage from 9/11.

They showed us this in the two months after Palin was named as VP hopeful.

9/11 was suppressed, and our soldiers and Iraqi citizens were killed for the Democrats to gain political power. They're that insane, and they used their media to make it happen.

Our 401Ks were also dancing to their tune after the market implosion. What else explains Paulson's actions this week?

"Gosh, those emergency billions upon billions that we needed to do that one REALLY REALLY important thing just before the election? Well, we still need them, but not for that thing that was important just before the election."

23 posted on 11/14/2008 6:52:08 PM PST by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
The Democrats don’t really believe in the War on Terror—they think it’s just a con game by the Bush administration to accumulate power.

BTW, I forgot to mention that you're right with this observation - the Democrats think this because THAT'S what they would have done...

24 posted on 11/14/2008 6:54:08 PM PST by an amused spectator (I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson