Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

eHarmony to Provide Gay Dating Service After Lawsuit
Fox News ^ | Nov 19th, 2008

Posted on 11/19/2008 3:21:06 PM PST by TaraP

Online dating service eHarmony has agreed to create a new Web site — "Compatible Partners" — for gay and lesbian users, the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General announced. Created as part of a settlement with Eric McKinley, a gay man from New Jersey, the Web site will provide services for users seeking same-sex partners by March 31, New Jersey Division on Civil Rights Director J. Frank Vespa-Papaleo said. eHarmony, which was founded by Dr. Neil Clark Warren in 2000, said the settlement was triggered by a Law Against Discrimination complaint filed by McKinley against the online service on March 14, 2005. As part of the agreement, eHarmony will pay McKinley $5,000 and will provide him a one-year complimentary membership. eHarmony — which was not found in violation of the law — also agreed to ensure that same-sex users will be matched using the same or equivalent technology used for its heterosexual clients. It will also post photographs of same-sex couples in its "Diversity" section of its Web site and in advertising materials. "Even though we believed that the complaint resulted from an unfair characterization of our business, we ultimately decided it was best to settle this case," eHarmony legal counsel Theodore Olson said in a statement. "eHarmony looks forward to moving beyond this legal dispute, which has been a burden for the company, and continuing to advance its business model of serving individuals by helping them find successful, long-term relationships."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 2disdusting4words; 2sick4words; eharmony; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; sick; sicksicksicksicksick

1 posted on 11/19/2008 3:21:06 PM PST by TaraP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

WHy does it seem like so many people have been infected with the virus...*Gayitis*


2 posted on 11/19/2008 3:23:42 PM PST by TaraP (A Big Black Horse and a Cherry Tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Sued right out of free markets by the Gaystapo.


3 posted on 11/19/2008 3:24:29 PM PST by omega4179 (1-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

I wonder what different questions will be asked on the gay dating questionaire ?


4 posted on 11/19/2008 3:26:05 PM PST by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Maybe how long have you been a sexual pervert?


5 posted on 11/19/2008 3:27:10 PM PST by TaraP (A Big Black Horse and a Cherry Tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Barney Frank can be their new spokesman.

6 posted on 11/19/2008 3:29:00 PM PST by Mojave (http://www.americanbacklash.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Well.. if it’s geared towards homosexuals it’s a must to know how big ‘it’ is. It’s all they seem to care about.


7 posted on 11/19/2008 3:29:04 PM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
You mean gay's and lesbians don't have their own dating web sites? Whodda thought????? Photobucket
8 posted on 11/19/2008 3:29:21 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Well, sure, fine, long as they keep the “gay” dating list separate and distinct from the “hetero” dating list.

Some people are not meant to mix.

Ever.

I thought there was already a gay dating service. It is arranged by a series of taps and foot motions within a public bathroom stall.

The beginning of the exchange: R U 1 2?


9 posted on 11/19/2008 3:29:50 PM PST by alloysteel (Molon labe! Roughly translated, "Come and take them!" referring to personal weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
This is the service that picks out matches from questions you answer.
So now if you don't answer your questions right, you may be considered for a gay relationship when looking for an opposite?

Not gonna do it.

10 posted on 11/19/2008 3:30:29 PM PST by chemicalman (We'll see if it was really all Bush's fault.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

liberaltarians trying to force people to accept gays


11 posted on 11/19/2008 3:31:08 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Why limit things to humans?
“Chocolate Lab seeks dating relationship with human; gender not important. My hobbies are chasing sticks, watering fire hydrants, etc. Short or long term relationship desired.”


12 posted on 11/19/2008 3:31:36 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I can't wait for January 20, 2013")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Why does a non government entity have to service something they feel is out of their market?


13 posted on 11/19/2008 3:32:41 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

I thought the same thing....
People like the Feminine Man the Butchy girl, the Pregnant Man, the Bi-Sexual deviant use to be confined to the Circus..

They went from the Circus to the Closet to being the Biggest pain in the arses for the rest of civilized society.


14 posted on 11/19/2008 3:35:51 PM PST by TaraP (A Big Black Horse and a Cherry Tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Heterosexuals need to sue gay sites for hateful discrimination.


15 posted on 11/19/2008 3:38:47 PM PST by informavoracious (It's after midnight, I'm FReepwalking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

So like SNL, will have to change the name to HeHarmony


16 posted on 11/19/2008 3:41:23 PM PST by MarkeyD (11-4-08 For the first time I can say I am ashamed of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

1. Do you pitch or catch?”

2. Which best decribes you: Indian, cowboy, contruction worker, sailor?

. . . .

Females

1. What color flanel plaid do wear?

2. On a quiet evening, which do you prefer to listen to: Indigo girls or Dixie Chicks?

3. How soon do you want to move in together?


17 posted on 11/19/2008 3:43:57 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

A libertarian would never force a private business to do this.

Liberals, on the other hand, would.


18 posted on 11/19/2008 3:45:16 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

The queer on the right looks like Nancy Pelosi.


19 posted on 11/19/2008 3:46:47 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware of Obama's Reichstag Fire; Don't permit him to seize emergency powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Pre-Op.


20 posted on 11/19/2008 3:48:28 PM PST by Mojave (http://www.americanbacklash.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Males:

“Who wants fudge?”


21 posted on 11/19/2008 3:48:54 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

LOL


22 posted on 11/19/2008 3:49:23 PM PST by Mojave (http://www.americanbacklash.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
The faux conservatives at Fox won't oppose this much. Heck, they possibly funded journalists who pressed for this action.

"According to LifeSite­News.com (Sept. 8 [2006]), the neocon Fox News channel donated $10,000 to the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA)."

23 posted on 11/19/2008 3:54:25 PM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

I wonder how things like that would work? It’d be hilarious for straights to sue G&L sites for discrimination .....


24 posted on 11/19/2008 3:55:26 PM PST by SkyDancer ("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Online dating service eHarmony has agreed to create a new Web site — "Compatible Partners" — for gay and lesbian users

eHomony.com

25 posted on 11/19/2008 3:56:06 PM PST by mikrofon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

“Why does a non government entity have to service something they feel is out of their market?”

With a question like that you are really out of touch with reality. Where did you go to school? What on earth did they teach you?

/


26 posted on 11/19/2008 3:58:12 PM PST by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

the liberaltarians. They want drugs to be legalized...but they also want free needles. They say they are pro-choice but they’ll get you if you are a doctor that refuses to perform abortions out of principle.
They are middle to upper class and don’t want socialism but they do want to go after traditional values.


27 posted on 11/19/2008 3:58:53 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Ridiculous.

They will never stop. Homosexuality needs to be reclassified as a mental(or emotional) illness.

28 posted on 11/19/2008 4:00:08 PM PST by Vision ("Test everything. Hold on to the Good." 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu
A private place can refuse service to anyone in most cases.
Some have signs saying they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.
Some say no service without shoes and a shirt.

Why not no service for gay couples if they want to specialize in 99% of the populations?

Government places like the DMV have to cater to everything under the sun.

I would think some company that wants to be only serving the heterosexual community could do so.

I bet this was NOT a court ruling but an out-of court settlement.
If this were a court ruling all the gay places could now be forced to service heterosexuals.

I think this was just people going after deep pockets eHarmony.

29 posted on 11/19/2008 4:03:52 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
This is silly. They must assume homosexuals are attracted the same way men and women are in order to use the software.
30 posted on 11/19/2008 4:08:06 PM PST by Vision ("Test everything. Hold on to the Good." 1 Thessalonians 5:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

Extortion! Plain and simple. Where is the outrage over this?


31 posted on 11/19/2008 4:08:52 PM PST by planter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

The Dixie Chicks are traitorous, not lesbians.


32 posted on 11/19/2008 4:24:04 PM PST by Douggles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
I bought a book by Neil Clark Warren after hearing him interviewed on Christian radio. Just did a search, and found the following about him:

"Dr. Neil Clark Warren earned his Ph.D. in clinical psychology from The University of Chicago, where he also served as a counselor and adjunct faculty member. He received his Masters of Divinity degree from Princeton Theological Seminary and completed his undergraduate degree at Pepperdine University."

I've been skeptical enough about eHarmony, but to push the envelope even further makes me think his Masters of Divinity isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

33 posted on 11/19/2008 4:35:49 PM PST by mombonn (God is looking for spiritual fruit, not religious nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
"Why does it seem like so many people have been infected with the virus...*Gayitis*"

Let me help you with that!

34 posted on 11/19/2008 4:36:36 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
me-harmony.com
35 posted on 11/19/2008 4:43:08 PM PST by steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

M4M Puddingmouth pedofiles


36 posted on 11/19/2008 4:53:49 PM PST by Michigan Bowhunter (Democrat socialist liberal scumbags.....how did we let this happen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michigan Bowhunter

On second thought, Barney would be a better spokesman for a “gay” escort service.


37 posted on 11/19/2008 4:55:51 PM PST by Mojave (http://www.americanbacklash.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
Enough crude joking! It's not funny in the least!! This strike against a private enterprise attempting to provide the services of their own choosing is yet another nail in the coffin of the homo-activists’ argument that others will not be required to approve, accommodate, or otherwise pander to the gay agenda. If a court can PUNISH a company for something like this, and require both punitive extraction of cash AND capitulation on a long-held policy, it's inconceivable what, if anything, cannot be demanded of businesses AND individuals in the interest of homosexuals’ desires. Completely unbelievable. I would have preferred that my company fold than to allow this complete violation of rights under a free enterprise system. The U.S. is over.
38 posted on 11/19/2008 5:09:47 PM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

A gay helping his partner get seated at the bar. “Can I push in your stool?”


39 posted on 11/19/2008 5:20:33 PM PST by george123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

File this one under “I demand you take my money, even though you may lose your business in providing me a service”.

Unless I am gravely mistaken, aren’t there Gay matchmaking sites online already? For one group to DEMAND that a possibly non-fiscally viable enterprise be undertaken by someone else, with no financial risk inherent upon the group is utterly insane.

How about “I DEMAND that Boeing make a plane with 16 Jet engines capable of flying at 15mph and carries 3 passengers.”

Certainly, if this flops, who is expected to take the financial risk? What happened to freedom? How can a group demand that I risk my retirement and build a product that they happen to want on the market - under my personal brand??


40 posted on 11/19/2008 5:24:04 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

the / = sarc tag. Maybe I should have /sarc - ed.

I agree.


41 posted on 11/20/2008 8:35:51 AM PST by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bobibutu

I figured so, but in case we had lurkers I went a little further with what I meant.

Keep in mind, probably many who aren’t memebers read our stuff.
Let’s just pray they learn something.


42 posted on 11/20/2008 9:21:08 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson