Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama plans 20,000 troop surge to boost Afghan effort
Daily Telegraph ^ | 26 Nov 2008 | Alex Spillius

Posted on 11/27/2008 1:26:22 AM PST by ScaniaBoy

The President-Elect's intention to shift the focus of the fight against terrorism to Afghanistan has been bolstered by Robert Gates agreement to stay on as Defence Secretary.

Mr Gates is a strong believer in an Afghan surge, which would not only put thousands more boots on the ground but involve negotiations with malleable branches of the Taliban. It would also aim to boost co-operation with Iran and Pakistan where some elements have supported the anti-Western insurgency.

The need for more US troops in addition to the 32,000 already serving, has been accelerated by the Afghan presidential election in September 2009, and the voter registration process that begins in the New Year, Mr Gates said.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 200909; 911; afghanistan; bho; bho2008; bhodod; bhogwot; binladen; cicobama; enduringfreedom; gates; hussein; islam; jihad; kabul; kyberrifles; michaelvickers; mohammedanism; neverforget; obama; obamatransitionfile; surge; taliban; wot
Interesting. Is this the right strategy?

I think this article should be contrasted with Rumsfeldt's oped piece in NYT. I posted a link to it in comment #10 here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2138191/posts

PS: It will be fun to see the Europeans squirm when their hero Obama will request more troops from THEM to reinforce the international force in Afghanistan.

1 posted on 11/27/2008 1:26:23 AM PST by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
20,000 troop surge...

Are they the ones we've been waiting for?

2 posted on 11/27/2008 1:35:38 AM PST by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Didn’t Kharzai just say today that he wanted the US out of Afghanistan ASAP?


3 posted on 11/27/2008 1:37:08 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7
Are they the ones we've been waiting for?

LOL!

4 posted on 11/27/2008 1:44:07 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XR7

Am I wrong in thinking the ONE was against the surge in Iraq ? Did the ONE did not say the surge was not working ?
Maybe I am wrong again, but, it seems the ONE is turning into George W Bush,. At last the ONE has seen the light in following the former President of America way of fighting Islamic terror.


5 posted on 11/27/2008 1:45:03 AM PST by AndyPH (?+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
Barack Obama plans 20,000 troop surge to boost Afghan effort

"NO! WAIT! YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG! LISTEN TO ME!!!"

6 posted on 11/27/2008 1:49:34 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyPH

The Dems have been militant when it comes to Afghanistan and Pakistan, but pacifist on Iraq. Go figure.


7 posted on 11/27/2008 1:53:25 AM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

They are never pacifist. They are just stabbing the military in the back whenever it fits them politically (whenver a Republican is in charge).


8 posted on 11/27/2008 1:59:07 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - Everything that is Sweetness and Light! WE STAND WITH HER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

It’s simply because they want to do anything opposite of George W. Bush. Had he put all our efforts in Afghanistan and nowhere else, they would have been totally against it.


9 posted on 11/27/2008 2:01:14 AM PST by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
They got his title wrong, it is Mr. Obama.
10 posted on 11/27/2008 2:05:59 AM PST by Ingtar (For the first time in my adult life, I am NOT proud of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dahoser
"It’s simply because they want to do anything opposite of George W. Bush. Had he put all our efforts in Afghanistan and nowhere else, they would have been totally against it. "

This is going to be forever known as "Obama's folly".

It reminds be of a cartoon I once saw on a Bazooka bubble gum wrapper, when I was about 9-years-old; it was about a guy out on the street at night, under a street light, walking around staring at the ground.

His friend asked, "What's going on?"

The guy says, "I lost a quarter and I'm trying to find it."

The friend asks, "Where did you lose it?"

The guy answers, "Out in the back yard."

The friend says, "Well, why aren't you looking for it in your back yard?"

To which the guy answered, "Because the light is better out here."


Kinda dumb, but so is waging a new war where it's not needed just to be different from George Bush.
11 posted on 11/27/2008 2:17:58 AM PST by FrankR (Where's Waldo ([W]here [A]re [L]egal [D]ocuments [O]bama? (i.e. birth certificate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

“Interesting. Is this the right strategy? “

Yup. It’s made possible by Bush prosecuting a successful war in Iraq so Obama has it easy. I think the decision is a big duh and is pretty much what would have happened had McCain been elected.

We can now move from success to success. It also keeps lots of boots on the ground in the middle east in case Iran gets frisky.

I don’t even mind letting BO have credit for it, if he will just prosecute the WOT. That’s despite that Bush and Petraeus made it all possible and despite that my nine year old could make the same decision with no difficulty.

He’s a democrat. He should be rewarded with praise and cookies for not making terrible decisions in foreign policy because all of his inclinations and all of the pressure from the folks who got him to the white house will be for him to make terrible decisions.


12 posted on 11/27/2008 2:35:46 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Check out some of the Viper Company videos on Youtube. You will see one of the soldiers say it is one step forward five steps back. The locals help the Taliban. You can give them all the free school supplies you want and it is not going to change. One of the reports shows that all the young men have left a village to support the insurgents.

I have been sending care packages to these outposts. They face tough conditions and do not have adequate number of soldiers or supplies. A 1st Lt recently posted on Anysoldier.com and they have very little. He was even asking for something as simple as nails.

Someone got a deal on those blankets you see at Walmart and is sending them a 100 according to a post on that site.

It is a losing battle with the amount of troops we have over there..but not sure 20,000 more will make a difference.


13 posted on 11/27/2008 2:39:41 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Thanks for the comment. I know too little of the situation in Afghanistan. I have been following the British blog [http://defenceoftherealm.blogspot.com/] and it is quite evident that the UK forces are too few and have the wrong equipment.

However, the political situation, both locally and nationally appears to me to be much worse in Afghanistan than in Iraq at the moment. On the other hand a few years ago the Iraqi situation was the one that was really worrisome.

So, the question that has to be answered is whether a troop surge will remedy both the military and political situation in Afghanistan?

14 posted on 11/27/2008 3:06:44 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
Agreed. Brokaw, let me say it for you,

America!
punkd Pictures, Images and Photos
Tom Brokaw & Sydney Pictures, Images and Photos


Our National Security, The Economy, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness Are No Joke to Most Americans

Punk'd Pictures, Images and Photos

Thank you Media, for the Fraudulent, One-Sided, Election of 2008
15 posted on 11/27/2008 3:24:03 AM PST by Son House (Mr. Øbama, Your Tax Increases Are Decreasing Job Opportunities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
> Mr Gates is a strong believer in an Afghan surge, which would not only put thousands more boots on the ground but involve negotiations with malleable branches of the Taliban.

Is this what His Excellency Barack Hussein Obama Dada needs his "Civilian Security Force" for? Negotiating with the Taliban terrorists?

16 posted on 11/27/2008 3:31:35 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

Hey! There’s a catchy name! Idi Obama Da Da, President for Life.


17 posted on 11/27/2008 3:48:39 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Afghanistan never attacked us...

Impeach the warmonger Obama!


18 posted on 11/27/2008 4:29:22 AM PST by NeoConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
> Hey! There’s a catchy name! Idi Obama Da Da, President for Life.

(grin!) I thought he might like it: it's suits his style.

I intend to use it this way:

"His Excellency" <--- Shorthand version

"His Excellency Barack Hussein Obama Dada" <--- Longer version

"Field Marshall" <--- When acting as Commander-in-Chief

"His Excellency President For Life Field Marshall Al Hadji Doctor Barack Hussein Obama Dada, VC, DSO, MC, King of Scotland, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fish of the Sea, Burden of the White Oppressors and Conquerer of the Constitution of the United Emirate of America." <--- Formal version

That way I can always show a suitable amount of Respect for America's first President for Life.

God Bless America
*DieHard*

19 posted on 11/27/2008 5:50:29 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AndyPH
I think barry is getting bit@* slapped into reality. All his fluffy clouds and rainbows won him the election. It was very easy for him to sit and judge Bush, but now, not so easy.

I WOULD NOT be surprised if barry called a “do over” and stepped down....or released his real birth certificate showing he is NOT eligible to be President.

20 posted on 11/27/2008 5:52:15 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Conservative Party...here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

They got his title wrong, it is Mr. Obama.

You mean Obama.


21 posted on 11/27/2008 6:07:12 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
The Dems have been militant when it comes to Afghanistan and Pakistan, but pacifist on Iraq. Go figure.

Thats because W's war in Iraq shut off Hussein's (Saddam) oil for food payments to the democrats.

22 posted on 11/27/2008 6:34:52 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

“They got his title wrong, it is Mr. Obama.

You mean Obama.”

I have to laugh at my 86 year old grandfather. He’s still sharp as a tack, but he just CANNOT remember the new ‘president elect’s’ name.
He calls him ‘Obongo’. I’ve stopped correcting him.
I’ve decided I like it. It fits him. LOL

.


23 posted on 11/27/2008 7:15:10 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

They should flatten the mountains Afghanistan in a month long , round the clock bombing raid and then come home.


24 posted on 11/27/2008 7:21:17 AM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Yea, I’m sure when he had his first security meeting they must have laid a big dose of reality on his ass , telling him about things none of us know about. Probably shook up the amateur Obama. I wouldn’t doubt he’s nervous as hell .
What’s the matter Barry , it’s a big bad world out there and you’re the leader. HAHHAHAH fraud that he is .


25 posted on 11/27/2008 7:24:31 AM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NeoConfederate
Afghanistan never attacked us... Impeach the warmonger Obama!

Please support our troops.

26 posted on 11/27/2008 7:26:42 AM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Oh I’m positive that the very moves that Bush made that were protested heavily by the left will be welcomed as brilliant when Obama pulls them off.The left are total frauds .


27 posted on 11/27/2008 7:35:20 AM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

How many hundreds of thousands of innocent afghani citizens will be slaughtered by us forces as a result of this? /sarasm


28 posted on 11/27/2008 7:39:17 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
I think everyone who has seen Obama can agree on one thing. The man has not even a tenth of the resilience of President Bush. If obama starts a “surge” in Afghanistan and gets set upon by the anti-US, anti-war far left, then he will never be able to handle it. That will make it certain he will be a one period president only.

Therefore I think your question is very relevant.

29 posted on 11/27/2008 8:14:04 AM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

It is funny...not ha ha funny, but the other one! He looks and sounds very nervous, not a good thing to be when you’re the most powerful leader in the world and have millions upon millions of jihadists that want your butt toasted!

Looks like WE THE PEOPLE are going to have to fight this battle!


30 posted on 11/27/2008 8:57:27 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Conservative Party...here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
I'm pretty sure they forgot their /s tag....however, it wasn't really needed.
31 posted on 11/27/2008 9:04:22 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Conservative Party...here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It is a losing battle with the amount of troops we have over there..but not sure 20,000 more will make a difference.’

20,000 more Predators might make a difference.......


32 posted on 11/27/2008 11:23:58 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy
It will be especially painful for the DUmmies and the KOS kids if the dems reinstate the daft and pull many of the liberal POS into the service to make up the 20,000 troops(not good for our Army though!). Fun watching their heads explode just at the mention of a surge.

Isn't it funny how he said a surge in Iraq would never work but now that he will be the one in charge(puke) he thinks we need a surge in Afghanistan.

33 posted on 11/27/2008 12:16:48 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

‘Obongo’

LOL I like that too.

I have another for you. I call Chicago - “Chicongo”. The two certainly go together.


34 posted on 11/28/2008 2:13:35 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Isn't it funny how he said a surge in Iraq would never work but now that he will be the one in charge(puke) he thinks we need a surge in Afghanistan.

Also funny is the fact that he doesn't do his own thinking - he has to copy President "BUSH". Where is this brilliant (</sarcasm>) dunce's change, he was talking about.

35 posted on 11/28/2008 2:21:45 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
"Civilian Security Force" Obsma's version of the Nazi SS

I can see no other use for it except to be used against the American people to quell an uprising against the government. If it's a police force it is not government by the "Passe comitatus Act". nd would be controlled by the federal government (Obama).

We already have the State Police in Each State, the sheriff's police in each county, and city police in each city, all under local control.

36 posted on 11/28/2008 2:38:57 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter
"Civilian Security Force" Obsma's version of the Nazi SS

I can see no other use for it except to be used against the American people to quell an uprising against the government. If it's a police force it is not governed by the "Passe comitatus Act". nd would be controlled by the federal government (Obama).

We already have the State Police in Each State, the sheriff's police in each county, and city police in each city, all under local control.

37 posted on 11/28/2008 2:40:09 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

They should flatten the mountains Afghanistan in a month long , round the clock bombing raid and then come home.

The Russians tried that already.
LBJ already did that in Nam.
But as they say: History repeats itself.


38 posted on 11/28/2008 2:49:30 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

> Don’t know whether this is a legitimate claim, but many people do see opportunity for personal gain in accidents.

It is the hallmark of Dictators worldwide and from time immemorial to establish a well-provisioned armed force loyal to them and to them only.

An early example of that was the Praetorian Guard.

This “Civilian Security Force” is His Excellency’s very own Praetorian Guard. What are the odds that, aside from being used against the populace, they will supplant the Secret Service and the Marines in Presidential guard duty?

I’d say he’d be silly not to do that. His Excellency is many things, but he is no fool.


39 posted on 11/28/2008 3:08:05 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

> The Russians tried that already.
> LBJ already did that in Nam.
> But as they say: History repeats itself.

IMO wars are not won with bombs but with boot-leather. (Yes, that even applies to WW-II)

Somehow, someday, the time will come for somebody to send Infantry in to Afghanistan and take the place over, no matter how hard it gets bombed.

The infantry there right now is doing a good job: they are where they need to be. If anything they need more Infantry and fewer bombs, IMO.


40 posted on 11/28/2008 3:12:10 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

LOL
Obongo from
Chicongo.


41 posted on 11/28/2008 3:54:12 AM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

I’d say he’d be silly not to do that. His Excellency is many things, but he is no fool.

That will need to be proved.


42 posted on 11/28/2008 4:39:58 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

meanwhile:

20,000 Muslims Attack a Church in Cairo
Islam in Action | Nov. 27Th 2008 | Christopher Logan
Posted on 11/27/2008 1:56:36 PM PST by Islaminaction
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2139297/posts

-and whereas, this is cool-

Coalition Provides Medical Aid to Afghan Woman, Baby
American Forces Press Service
Posted on 11/28/2008 5:59:34 AM PST by SandRat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2139526/posts

-this is more ROP in action-

British soldiers attacked by furious mob in Kabul
after American troops ‘ram minibus off road killing one’
by Jerome Starkey
Last updated at 1:46 PM on 28th November 2008
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
http://tinyurl.com/minibusriotinkabul


43 posted on 11/28/2008 7:12:27 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson