Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Man Protects His Wife From Starvation and Dehydration Euthanasia Death
Life News ^ | 11/22/08 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 11/27/2008 4:43:09 PM PST by wagglebee

Toledo, OH (LifeNews.com) -- A case involving some similarities to that of Terri Schiavo has ended in success as an Ohio man has been able to protect his wife from a similar starvation and dehydration euthanasia death. Robert Lavers won a legal decision in his desire to protect his disabled wife.

Lavers sought to protect his spouse, Heather Lavers, who went into a coma after suffering a heart attack in September and had been receiving medical care, nutrition, and hydration at a Florida hospital not far from her and her husband’s home.

Robert Lavers' sister-in-law succeeded in having the court name him as guardian Tuesday when she withdrew her application for guardianship. As a result, health Lavers won't have her nutrition and hydration removed.

Joel Kirkpatrick, an attorney who worked with the pro-life law firm Alliance Defense Fund, told LifeNews.com he's elated at the result of the case.

“Everyone deserves a chance to recover. We are pleased that Heather will be given this chance,” said Kirkpatrick. “Robert Lavers is the rightful guardian of his wife and simply desires to take care of her. He did not want a death sentence for Heather.”

After the coma, Robert Lavers agreed to the request of Heather’s sister, Heidi Kaczala, that Heather Lavers be moved to Ohio where she could receive better medical care and be close to her family. He moved to Ohio when his wife was transferred to a Toledo hospital.

Following the transfer, Kaczala applied to be appointed as her sister’s legal guardian.

At that time, Kaczala did not agree with Robert Lavers that his wife should be kept alive because she believed that her sister would not want to live in her current condition. For that reason, Kaczala indicated to Robert Lavers that she would consider the option of withdrawing food and water if given guardianship.

Kaczala consented to withdraw her application for guardianship prior to a formal hearing Tuesday.

The Probate Court of Lucas County issued a letter naming Robert Lavers as legal guardian over his wife in the lawsuit In re: Lavers.

Related web sites:
Alliance Defense Fund - http://www.telladf.org



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: euthanasia; heatherlavers; moralabsolutes; prolife
Thank God it ended this way.
1 posted on 11/27/2008 4:43:10 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser; Salvation

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 11/27/2008 4:44:02 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 11/27/2008 4:44:24 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Has it ended though? This man will learn that government, medical profession, the church, and the people are not on “his side”.


4 posted on 11/27/2008 4:56:45 PM PST by Theodore R. (The most frightening words in the English language: The American people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


5 posted on 11/27/2008 4:56:47 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Has it ended though? This man will learn that government, medical profession, the church, and the people are not on “his side”.

What church are you talking about?

6 posted on 11/27/2008 5:00:21 PM PST by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Has it ended though?

No...it's prolonged.

But this is the right outcome...the spouse should have the say, as he is her partner.

7 posted on 11/27/2008 5:16:49 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

“But this is the right outcome...the spouse should have the say, as he is her partner.”

This is the right outcome because it is wrong to kill innocent people.


8 posted on 11/27/2008 5:22:38 PM PST by dsc (A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It’s not over and this is another example of why people need a living will.


9 posted on 11/27/2008 5:53:34 PM PST by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

Ping!


10 posted on 11/27/2008 7:17:08 PM PST by Ellendra (Most eco-freaks wouldn't know nature if it bit them on the butt . . . and it often does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I found this You Tube video. It's beautiful.


Heather Lavers - Praying for a Miracle

It's all in the video. Please keep my Mother in your prayers.


11 posted on 11/27/2008 8:58:01 PM PST by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
This is the right outcome because it is wrong to kill innocent people.

That's right. For most people, the issue is WHO gets to decide whether or not to kill an innocent person; as though anyone actually has that right. They overlook the very real fact that nobody has the right to decide that an innocent person should be killed. Being married to that person, or a blood relative of that person, doesn't give anyone the right to order them murdered.

12 posted on 11/27/2008 9:04:22 PM PST by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

“They overlook the very real fact that nobody has the right to decide that an innocent person should be killed.”

How did so many people lose sight of that obvious truth?


13 posted on 11/27/2008 9:14:01 PM PST by dsc (A man with an experience is never at the mercy of a man with an argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dsc

I have no idea. Ask any child if it’s okay to kill someone for being disabled, and chances are, you’ll get a rational response. Most children know that murder is wrong. Some people lose that knowledge before they reach adulthood. I can’t imagine how that happens.


14 posted on 11/27/2008 9:26:29 PM PST by BykrBayb (May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

thanks - love still reigns!


15 posted on 11/28/2008 7:08:59 AM PST by knittnmom (FReeper formerly known as 80 Square Miles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson