Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rod Dreher: Ron Paul, if only we listened
The Dallas Morning News ^ | 2008-11-25 | Rod Dreher

Posted on 11/30/2008 11:16:35 AM PST by rabscuttle385

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-255 last
To: Bokababe

Neo-con is another Leftist label devoid of meaning. It is allegedly followers of Leo Strauss a political philosopher almost none using the label have even read.

Salman Pak was not in Saudi Arabia. Saddam’s agents were working with Bin Laden since at least 1992 if you are not aware of this you should be too ashamed to even discuss these issues. Saddam’s ambassador to the Philippines was kicked out because of Iraq’s assistance to the al Queda offshot in Mendinao. Saddam’s agent planned the first Twin Tower attack and Saddam was found liable by a US Court for terror activities HERE.

Saudi Arabia has its own set of problems but has never been anywhere close to the danger Saddam was. There have not been hundreds of thousands of Saudi citizens murdered by the King. Nor has the Kingdom attacked its neighbors resulting in millions more deaths.

I am a “sponge” for the truth. I soak it up and much to your dismay can squeeze it out again.

251 posted on 12/01/2008 11:17:25 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
"Saudi Arabia as a nation does not fund terrorists and has been a close and valuable ally since its inception. Bin Laden deliberately selected as many Saudis as he could because of their ease in getting visas and to divide the US and the Kingdom. It didn’t work with me since I immediately understood what he was trying to do. More likely to depose the Royal Family there is the religious authorities not us. It must thread a fine line. Indications are that changes are occurring there which are turning against the Islamists."

Where are you from arrogantsob? What country, what State?

252 posted on 12/01/2008 11:21:06 PM PST by Bokababe (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Not protecting our Nation is exactly what the Left wants, a Paulist policy.

Protecting our nation?

Oh you mean as Bush looked on, and publicly encouraged millions of *unknowns* to enter this country illegally, during war time, as he rationalized these people entering "illlegally" during war, as, "Just hard working folks".

In reality, he had not a clue who these millions were that were entering illegally, as Americans are forced to pay billions for this lawlessness.

If that were not enough, he labels those American volunteers that had a belly full of this government sponsored lawlessness, as "vigilantes". lol...

You might not of realized it slick, but due to these Bush policies of the past 8 years, our entire system, all the way down to our electoral process has been undermined and compromised.

You cannot flood a country with billions in counterfeit cash, or millions of people illegally, with compromising and undermining our system. Protecting our Nation?

His administration has made American citizenship, all but pointless.

While he was protecting our massive nuclear submarine fleets that roam the seven seas from Saddam, our homeland, from our economy to our borders and sovereignty, suffered immensely.

Protecting our nation?

You like him, seem to not have a clue as to the damage done.

Bush understood that the best place to protect our nation was Iraq not a border crossing where wetbacks sneak in.

Bush understood nothing!

You are developing a patter of these moronic statements.

Allow me to continue.

Ya got the equivalent of the population of a major city entering illegally, during wartime, every few months.

This from an extremely corrupt country, during war time, and you say, "Oh, it's OK, these millions are just wetbacks".


Bush should have made you his security chief.

Bush was protecting *our* homeland in Iraq?

You're so full of crap. Saddam was no threat to the U.S. Hell, even Rove and Bush has all but admitted that.

Did ya forget about our massive nuclear submarine fleet roaming the seven seas?

If Saddam was such a threat to the U.S. why in hell do our borders resemble a Boston Marathon of millions entering illegally from God knows where?

Why would Bush allow in tens of thousands of Muslims every year legally?

Is Bush not afraid one of his Muslim friends will enter with a vile of bio-nasty? Whats up with that slick?

Even the Bush administration stated they had not a clue who was entering from our southern border. Even Bush's security agencies have said they have discovered people from dozens of different countries entering from Mexico, some with terrorist connections.

It's no secret slick, you can bribe Mexican officials with a little cash, beer and prostitutes. Mexico is one of the most corrupt countries on earth. This is a terrorist dream come true.

Trying to convince everyone that securing Iraq was the key to Americas safety is bunk. No one buys that crap. He'll, even Bush has all but admitted this.

No sale slick.

While Bush was spending 10 billion a month in Iraq, chasing bad guys in bathrobes all over the dusty alleys of Baghdad, he was winking and nodding at tens of thousands of Muslims entering the U.S. legally.

Why is Bush not concerned about his towel head friends entering our homeland?

No longer can you find a taxi driver in this country that isn't a Muslim.

Why was Bush not concerned that one of his Muslim buddies would be carrying a vile of Bio-juice?

This would clearly have been more of a threat than anything Saddam could do.

You're full O crap slick.

Those capable of critical thinking don't buy this, "We're in Iraq to protect America" BS.

You just keep ignoring the obvious, but please, continue to spout off with yesterdays worn out line of BS.

253 posted on 12/02/2008 8:26:54 AM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Thank you for your irenic reply. I have not yet had a chance to get to looking at this claim. I hope you won’t mind a reply or two way “after the fact.”

I am somewhat disappointed that your replies do not match your moniker on this one!! (smile) Seriously, thanks for the give and take. It is nice when these things help me LEARN and not just jostle egos with people.

254 posted on 12/02/2008 9:06:50 AM PST by slnk_rules (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Species8472

Congrats to those Paulites who joined the GOP and helped elect somebody to something this fall.

Many of us know from experience: supporting candidates who get 9% in the primary or 27% in the general ... it gets old after a while.

There are 50 to 80 GOP House members who completely understand that much of the federal budget is outside the proper role of the federal government. If you are of such mind that absolutely none of them is “constitutionally sound” ... all I can say is that you probably want to just live in your own private Idaho ... no constitution is required. extraConstitutionalism and exobiology are an interdisciplinary study.

255 posted on 12/11/2008 6:46:59 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-255 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson