Personally I would like to see none of the above. We need a new Reagan. None of these are a new Reagan.
She won the endorsement of the Libertarian Party when she ran for governor of Alaska. No one ever doubted her fiscal conservatism until the MSM did their best to pigeon hole her as some rightwing theocrat nutjob.
Who minds a bit of cultism and magical garments?
The “battle” is all in the minds of MSM. They would like nothing better than an imbroglio between the contenders. GOP gains by avoiding a fight and instead pursue a strategy of positive push for your candidate without violating the 11th commandment.
I’d go with Mark Sanford from South Carolina, at this point.
Why is that unlikely? She can certainly do it if she wants to. Alaskans would support her in that endeavor.
Actually, Huckabee happened to Huckabee. Given a choice between an Evangelical Christian who is a religious bigot and and economic populist and an Evangelical Christian who is an economic conservative and is not bigoted against Catholics and Mormons, even Evangelical Christians will chose the later.
Huck needs to run for the Senate from Arkansas and forget about being president. Either that or just quietly go away.
I am solidly supporting Governor Palin.
Huckabee is not a conservative by a long shot, and I think he is left of center on his religious views.
At least by this Christian Conservative.
“For instance, 24.4% Republican voters want Governor Sarah Palin to be the Republican candidate for president in 2012. Only 13.4% of all voters agree.
At the same time, Governor Mitt Romney ranks second among all voters, six points behind Palin, but leads among all voters (be it barely).”
That would be Democrats who are not voting Republican anyway, and moderates who don’t know what they want?
Why do we care what ‘all voters’ want?
Didn’t we go through this in the primaries when ‘all voters’ chose John McCain?
Romney the RINO I can do without.
These people want us engaged in internecine warfare and they want us to start it right now.
I am not going to help give them what they want.
Palin will have their goose and leave a dime for change
with the gizzard.
She outclasses all of them.
And they want to be rid of her for that reason.
Ain’t gonna happen folks!
Too Quayle-ized, Too Compromised, and Too Soon. Not much of a choice.
That's a "codeword" from the last campaign and it usually has to do with the fact she didn't kill her, or her daughter's babies.
That's hardly a moderate point of view.
Do we have a list of "a$$wipez" where we can keep track of these pukes so that no one posts them here.
As the 22nd most significant source of news in the United States, I think we owe it to ourselves and our readership to DENY them access to people who are leading lives not worth living (such as appears to be the case with Michael van der Galien)
24.4% Republican voters want Governor Sarah Palin to be the Republican candidate for president in 2012. ———— Only 13.4% of “all voters” agree. .............. Oh Yeah, When only 13% of the MSM “all voters” agree then we know we got a good one. I question the 24.4% too, I think they got it backwards, its probably more like 44.2%. Bottom line, the condition of the economy will decide the next election.
Palin, Jindal, Sanford, Steele. These are the new Republican generation and do we ever need them.