Tenure review is too onerous?
Oh, boo hoo!
What a bunch of ivory-tower whiners.
ht comments
1 posted on
12/02/2008 9:08:23 AM PST by
george76
To: Morgan in Denver; jan in Colorado; LucyT; SunkenCiv
Churchill was found guilty of deliberate false assertions, misrepresentation of sources, and plagiarism.
2 posted on
12/02/2008 9:09:37 AM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
This should be a parody, but it doesn’t seem to be.
5 posted on
12/02/2008 9:26:12 AM PST by
Tax-chick
("And the LORD alone will be exalted in that day." (Is. 2)
To: george76
And get his pillow fluffed at night with a nice little chocolate also. /SARCASM
6 posted on
12/02/2008 9:27:50 AM PST by
bmwcyle
(McCain had no honor when he failed to defend Sarah Palin, Leno was not enough)
To: george76
Some University of Colorado faculty members say they’re saddled by useless rules Good. Maybe they will develop some understanding of how American business feels about all the idiotic govt regulations that stifle their ability to compete in this world.
Not to mention keep their sanity.
7 posted on
12/02/2008 9:28:47 AM PST by
freespirited
(Honk to indict the MSM for treason.)
To: george76; SunkenCiv
Tenure review is too onerous? No, it doesn't say that. It refers to Post-tenure review.
The AAUP believes the potential benefit of post-tenure review is little, while the costs are potentially great.
Note that post-tenure review is often a way to remove faculty with unpopular views, without having to go through special proceedings. Does anyone think such a system would protect the rights of conservatives?!
9 posted on
12/02/2008 5:23:03 PM PST by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson