Skip to comments.First Test Fire of an Airborne Laser
Posted on 12/04/2008 11:54:17 PM PST by gandalftb
click here to read article
“I suppose you could spin the missile as well as reflective coating the skin, so that no single targeted spot gets overheated. I really dont know the physics of these particular lasers well enough to know if that would work.”
The pitch has been that under the G forces of boost phase, it doesn’t take much weakening for the structure to fail. Reflective and spinning missiles might well make a difference.
It occurs to me though, that targeting the missile’s nozzles might be highly productive. They are already hot, which increases their absorption and makes them easier to destroy. There are typically other delicate structures in the neighborhood of the nozzles as well.
The article isn’t quite right on one point BTW, the laser runs for (IIRC) about 40 seconds per “shot”. It can engage multiple 3-5 second targets during that period. The system will be able to shoot several times per mission.
The military already has a “death ray.” It turns out that the sensor systems for the F-35 (and F-22, I think) are potent enough to fry missile electronics and they are quietly experimenting with them used in that mode...
So what do you bet they can do “Wonderful Things” with an AWACS?
There was a space game back in the late 80’s called “Elite”.
One of the accessories that you could get for your ship was an ECM for missiles. Basically an energy blast that fried the missile. Took a lot of energy. The info in your post shows that such a thing is indeed possible.
*Looks at watch*
Still waiting for lightsabres....
It would be a design modification and not very difficult. The 747 isn’t a fused wing/body design, and there’s nothing particularly bad about the body for high-altitude flight.
It just needs more wing area, like a U-2. Modern composites would probably mean no extra weight either.
I have been told by Boeing engineers that the wing form used on their commercial aircraft is optimized for Flight levels between 30,000 ad 40,000 feet. That it will not fly over 60,000. To redesign and qualify an new wing system - which BTW would require a whole new control system of rudder etc - would be a waste. There are already large aircraft flying at much higher altitudes that have qualified wings etc.
"It's an honor to meet you, sir. Telcom... isn't that the satellite that's raining debris all over Europe?"
"Why is that toy on your head?"
"Because if I wear it anywhere else, it chafes."
I loved Elite! I also played Wing Commander Privateer, and that was pretty good.
I wish there was something like it on the market today, maybe a little more advanced to take advantage today’s processors.
LOL, I actually did the math to check.
“There are already large aircraft flying at much higher altitudes that have qualified wings etc.”
Really? Which ones?
Then there’s the question of whether it’d be cheaper to redesign the entire laser system for a new, smaller aircraft, or just design a new wing. Requalification either way.
Larger tail surfaces are far more trivial than the wing. With CAD and simulation it can all be tested before being built.
Wow, that's really haulin' **s!
They wouldn't even have time to say "here it comes"... "there it is"... "there it goes"... /g
a] not dramatic enough for car chase fans
b] speed of light is irrevelant and unknown to average GED educated American
c] "warp speed" was vetoed by the editorial staff
d] they wanted to see if I had a calculator....
...SOL is actually 669.6 MM MPH.
Yes, chaff has been used in lots of science fiction stories as a defense against lasers. It would probably be effective as long as the asset being protected isn’t moving too fast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.