Skip to comments.They Won't Give Him Credit
Posted on 12/05/2008 4:03:54 AM PST by Kaslin
I can see it now. The world will be very different. The president of the United States will receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his lifesaving aid to victims of disease in Africa. Government and civic leaders from Europe and Asia will express their admiration. Americans will walk a little taller. Barack Obama will bow his head as the ribboned medal is extended
But wait. The president who deserves such an honor is in office now. It is George W. Bush who has devoted so much time, energy, and money (well, our money, but it was legal) to fighting AIDS and other diseases in Africa.
From the beginning of his administration, President Bush has pushed for more aid to Africa. Motivated perhaps by his deeply felt Christian faith (relieving poverty in Africa has become a major charitable push among evangelicals), the president has pressed for greater aid to Africa across the board. The original PEPFAR legislation (President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), which passed in 2003, was the largest single health investment by any government ever ($15 billion). At the time the initiative was launched, only about 50,000 sub-Saharan Africans were receiving antiretroviral treatment for AIDS. Today, 1.7 million people in the region, as well as tens of thousands more around the globe, are receiving such treatment. PEPFAR has also funded efforts to prevent mother-to-child transmission of the AIDS virus, provided compassionate care to the sick and dying, and cared for 5 million orphans. One aspect of the program has been to reduce the stigma of the AIDS diagnosis in Africa.
In July of this year, the president requested that funding for PEPFAR be doubled to $30 billion. The new funding will be used to train 140,000 new health care workers. It would also address other illnesses, like tuberculosis, that often complicate AIDS.
The president also backed a malaria initiative that has provided an estimated 25 million Africans with nets, spraying, and other prevention and treatment options. Separate from the AIDS funds, the president has tripled development assistance and humanitarian aid to Africa since taking office.
When he traveled to Africa earlier this year (his second trip to the region as president), President Bush was greeted by enthusiastic crowds and grateful heads of state. Of the 10 nations around the world that expressed the most positive feelings toward the U.S.A. in a recent Pew poll, eight were in Africa. (The other two were Israel and the U.S.) President Jakaya Kikwete of Tanzania paid tribute to Mr. Bush, saying, as the Christian Science Monitor reported, "Different people may have different views about you and your administration and your legacy. We in Tanzania, if we are to speak for ourselves and for Africa, we know for sure that you, Mr. President, and your administration have been good friends of our country and of Africa."
"Bush Has Quietly Tripled Aid to Africa." So headlined a Washington Post story from 2006. But the president has been trying not to be quiet about it. On the contrary, he's been touting it as often as he can.
But he gets precious little credit. Yes, Rick Warren of the Saddleback Church has awarded President Bush the "International Medal of Peace" for his humanitarian efforts in Africa. And a few agitators for international aid like Bono and Bob Geldof have put in a few good words for the man. Actually, Geldof was pretty interesting. He said George Bush had done more for Africa than his predecessor and was "pissed off" at the press for failing to report it.
But for the most part, the beautiful people in America -- the Hollywood and university types, the book and magazine publishers, and of course, the major media -- have shown complete indifference to George W. Bush's dedication to a cause they purport to value. In fact, they've pointedly ignored it. It goes without saying that if Obama does even half of what Bush has done for AIDS sufferers in Africa, he will be -- in the eyes of those same people -- a candidate for canonization.
Of course the left can say whatever they like about George Bush and the war in Iraq and the war on terror. But when he does something completely in line with their own stated principles and values, it is simply mean-spirited of them to deny him his due.
Please don't disturb the grazing iguanas. Just let them go on being quietly ugly, wherever they are.
More BS. There’s already too much time, money and attention being spent on AIDS. Very, very, very, very, very few of us will ever contract it.
I think he would have gotten it if the left agreed with the war and the economy was not in the pits. But really does President Bush need a Nobel Peace Prize? The only person I know that had anything to do with government was Gore and who would want to follow that creep?
Africans love W, not for the color of his skin, but for the content of his character.
Gee, thanks, Mona, for bringing this up now. Of course it would have been wrong to have mentioned it before, during the election when Democrats and Republicans alike were crucifying the man for political gain even though it has been going on, “from the beginning of his administration...”
I tend to agree that the AIDS $$ is generally a form of lefty bribes. $30 billion of US taxpayer’s dollars +++ how much more sent down the rathole of Africa and the MidEast.
Globalism infected politics have destroyed our country.
For once, a flaming liberal acknowledges a good deed when he sees it!
Sad that there will be vying for position as to who gets credit for an unConstitutional expense of my hard earned $$$$.
Love how you put that!
TR and Carter too. I believe Bush deserves one, if only to underscore his likeness to Carter--both were/are totally incompetent Commanders-in-Chief and will go down in the annals of presidential legacies as complete and utter failures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.