Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Birth Certificate, Constitution, Supreme Court - The Usurper’s New Clothes
Canada Free Press ^ | 12/8/08 | Jayme Evans

Posted on 12/08/2008 4:27:58 AM PST by pissant

Intro: Facts are so inconvenient to those brimming with intellectual dishonesty.

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” - Barry Goldwater

A favorite tactic of Communists, liberals and others on the left is using peer pressure-laced name-calling to try and marginalize those with whom they disagree. If they can successfully convince enough people that a particular viewpoint is held only by those on the fringes, as opposed to the mainstream, they believe they can successfully discredit that person as a crackpot.

They frequently brandish the labels Hitler, racist and extreme right-wing in their pathetic attempts to banish conservatives who believe in strict Constitutional interpretations to the extremities of the political spectrum. But, no matter how many people in this country --or elsewhere-- attack my efforts to protect and defend my Constitution, unless and until President-Elect Obama produces his original vault birth certificate for public scrutiny, he will be little more than a usurper; an illegitimate and impotent poseur. And no amount of name-calling, taunts or questions of sanity, patriotism or intelligence will change that fact. Those tactics only work on the weak-minded and those without the courage of their convictions.

As Americans, we pledge our loyalty to our nation and its founding principles, not to the politicians who’ve destroyed it by abandoning those principles and certainly not to our bloated, collapsing behemoth of a bureaucracy. What I and thousands of other Americans are asking for is not irrational. It is not extreme. It is not a burden. It is a non-negotiable requirement of our Constitution and a prerequisite of any constitutionally-elected president.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; larrysinclairslover; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: pissant

Liberals believe they are more important than the Constitution. They always have.

41 posted on 12/08/2008 6:56:16 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We need a Life Thread on the Main Board for the Supreme Court decision. Can you do it?

42 posted on 12/08/2008 7:10:20 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

SCOTUS denied. It was just posted.

43 posted on 12/08/2008 7:13:21 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Every law the dOpey-One signs should be challenged. Some will be thrown out some won’t, setting up a Supreme Court decision. They should resolve this before he takes office or there will be chaos in the law for decades.

The sad fact is there is no way Biden would be better.

44 posted on 12/08/2008 7:29:52 AM PST by depressed in 06 (Bolshecrat, when only the very worse will do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

45 posted on 12/08/2008 8:02:10 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth


Posted in Uncategorized on December 8, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
My application was denied. The Honorable Court chose not to state why.

Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday. I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.

After six days, it’s interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.

My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a “motion for leave to appeal” rather than the “direct appeal” that it actually was. On Dec 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Dec. 22. The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.

On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Cort’s case, I must stress that Cort’s case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does. It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.

I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.

I don’t know if it’s significant that Cort’s case was not denied at the same time as mine. His case argues the same exact theory - that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.

All eyes should now be closely watching US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

If Cort’s application is also denied then the fat lady can sing. Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case. Cort’s application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Cort’s quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.

I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.

Cort’s case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.

I’m not trying to play with people’s minds here. SCOTUS has not updated Cort’s docket and until they do there can be no closure. I was expecting, if they didn’t grant certiorari, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue. I hate to read tea leaves, but Cort’s application is still pending. That’s all we can really say with any certainty.

46 posted on 12/08/2008 9:14:34 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
I don't see a precedent for bailing out newspapers ..

Neither do I. Note the "/sarc" in my signature. Government-owned papers? Shades of Pravda.

47 posted on 12/08/2008 9:56:56 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

FREEPERS: Listen on Plains Radio Network now at:

Bookmark Leo Donofrio’s web site below and read all his information. Please check back for updates often. Leo is working with Cort on his case in Conference for Friday.Justice Scalia referred Cort’s case for Friday 12/12 Conference which is EARLIER than it would have normally gone to Conference. Might be a good sign.:)

This is not over yet. Visit Freeper Joe Thunder’s web site and read about the Press Conference that he has on tape and will post tomorrow. The room was FULL of MSM but you won’t see it on TV!

48 posted on 12/08/2008 6:00:06 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson