Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Wants Truth About Obama, Files Petition
The Examiner ^ | 12/9/08 | Jon Connolly

Posted on 12/09/2008 4:21:22 AM PST by pissant

A Pennsylvania man has filed a petition to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, seeking the court to make the Pennsylvania Secretary of the commonwealth demand proof from President-elect Barack Obama that he is qualified as a natural born citizen of the United States.

The petition, filed by James D. Schneller, seeks Mr. Obama's sworn statement, filed with his application for placement on the ballot, and an injunction preventing the certification of the vote and of the Pennsylvania electors ballot, by the secretary, including any certification to Pennsylvania's governor, and postponing of the scheduled meeting of the electors, which by law usually occurs on the third Monday of December.

Mr. Schneller says that if the candidate has not shown his eligibility under the Constitution, the electors should not have their votes certified, their votes should not be tallied in the traditional meeting before the governor, nor should the certified ballots be lodged with the president of the Senate, nor the joint session of Congress early in January.

"It is astounding that no official has demanded proof of this gentleman's eligibility under what is a most simple and basic requirement for the presidency," said Mr. Schneller. "A bare statement by the Hawaii Health Director that they have a valid birth certificate is completely insufficient, and the fact that Sen. Obama apparently has placed a doctored 'certificate of live birth' on the internet, and may have falsely sworn in his candidate affidavits in thirty or more states, should put every American on notice that the Presidency may be being sought invalidly."

John P. Connolly can be reached at jconnolly@thebulletin.us

(Excerpt) Read more at thebulletin.us ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: anotherfringethread; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; conspiracytheory; cuckooforcocoapuffs; dumbasstrolls; enoughalready; fewcansshortofa6pack; getalife; icecreammandrake; kookmagnetthread; larrysinclairslover; morethorazineplease; obama; obamafagstroll; offmymeds; preciousbodilyfluids; purityofessence; rightwingtroofers; ronpaulkooks; sapandimpurify; stupidtrolls; tinfoilhatalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last
We will pry the original birth records from his cold, marxist fingers...
1 posted on 12/09/2008 4:21:22 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LucyT; Calpernia; Kevmo

Another one....


2 posted on 12/09/2008 4:23:16 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
the fact that Sen. Obama apparently has placed a doctored 'certificate of live birth' on the internet

The petitioner forgot to mention "the fact that" he receives radio messages from aliens through the fillings in his teeth.

3 posted on 12/09/2008 4:24:44 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Once the electors are certified and this is sent to the Senate, there is no court in this land that can do anything. The courts and successfully protected the Obamessiah


4 posted on 12/09/2008 4:26:29 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

Do some research and then speak


5 posted on 12/09/2008 4:28:18 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

We’ll impeach his marxist butt


6 posted on 12/09/2008 4:29:40 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We’ll know he’s feeling some heat when his surrogates start using the “R” word. That’s supposed to be intimidating.


7 posted on 12/09/2008 4:29:50 AM PST by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

Techdude delivers a final report that exceeds my wildest expectations. It is irrefutable, empirical evidence - Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery. Why? Why a COLB (certificate of live birth) forgery? That is the question.

My deepest thanks and appreciation for Techdude’s unwavering commitment to the truth despite the threats and harassment, the slashed tires and the dead animal on his porch.

Insofar as “techdude’s” credentials, he is an active member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, American College of Forensic Examiners, The International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, International Information Systems Forensics Association - the list goes on. He also a board certified as a forensic computer examiner, a certificated legal investigator, and a licensed private investigator. He has been performing computer based forensic investigations since 1993 (although back then it did not even have a formal name yet) and he has performed countless investigations since then.

Here is his analysis:

Obama’s Birth Certificate – CHANGE you can believe in.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html


8 posted on 12/09/2008 4:30:49 AM PST by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

About the time a foreign nation decides to use whatever it is that he’s hiding against us there’ll be trouble. IF we find out about it.


9 posted on 12/09/2008 4:32:00 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

Rely on Polarik, not techdude.


10 posted on 12/09/2008 4:32:01 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant
We’ll impeach his marxist butt

Unfortunately, impeachment is also in the hands of the marxist senate.

11 posted on 12/09/2008 4:32:32 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Not if he is shown to be a fraud, which he most likely is. The 2010 elections could indeed be historical.

If we prove he lied about his birth circumstances (and we will), then we will have proved his COLB to be a forgery. Indeed a high crime.

I’d much prefer to disqualify him before he takes the oath of office and save the country from this debacle.


12 posted on 12/09/2008 4:36:26 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nobama08
There are similar individuals who have provided ostensible forensic "evidence" that Oswald was not a lone gunman and that the WTC towers were destroyed through controlled demolition.

Some folks' tinfoil hats are on so tight here they don't even realize they are wearing one.

13 posted on 12/09/2008 4:41:44 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

New Obama lawsuit ping!


14 posted on 12/09/2008 4:42:56 AM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

the fact that Sen. Obama apparently has placed a doctored ‘certificate of live birth’ on the internet

The petitioner forgot to mention “the fact that” he receives radio messages from aliens through the fillings in his teeth.


Is that based on the man’s desire to see the US Constitution upheld and honored? Then why do I not get messages from the aliens?


15 posted on 12/09/2008 4:44:12 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Thank you for all of your good answers. You, unlike some others, are NOT a quitter.


16 posted on 12/09/2008 4:44:35 AM PST by kitkat (THE DAY WE LOSE OUR WILL TO FIGHT WILL BE THE DAY WE LOSE OUR FREEDOM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

Techdude’s assertions deserve to be published in The Journal of Irreproducible Results.


17 posted on 12/09/2008 4:44:45 AM PST by ComputerGuy (not my real name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Apprently you have not read this:

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=20210273


18 posted on 12/09/2008 4:47:13 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

KOF, the fact remains that your man the O, has not provided his BC, has spent over $800,000.00 to fight this.

No doubt from your posts concerning this issue you do not care about the Constitution or the rule of law.


19 posted on 12/09/2008 4:49:59 AM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

I thought Obama gets those radio messages from the anal probe Larry Sinclair gave him.


20 posted on 12/09/2008 4:52:04 AM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

Being a “libertarianist conservative” does that mean you don’t believe in the rule of law?


21 posted on 12/09/2008 4:55:15 AM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
About the time a foreign nation decides to use whatever it is that he’s hiding against us there’ll be trouble. IF we find out about it.

Yep, because the ones who will be caught in that crossfire will be our troops, acting under the orders of an illegal Commander in Chief, which would presumably invalidate the orders.

Our guys could well end up in the dock at the Hague or worse.

22 posted on 12/09/2008 4:57:56 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida
Some folks' tinfoil hats are on so tight here they don't even realize they are wearing one.

Really? You have, of course seen all the missing documents?

You can personally state unequivocally that not Only is Obama a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, but he never traveled on a foreign passport, never registered as a foreign student, and has always maintained his Natural Born Citizen status?

Right.

What the Left portrays as an assault on Obama is, in reality, an effort to uphold the United States Constitution. The question has been raised, and Obama can quell all the hubbub by simply providing the documents which are needed to prove that he qualifies.

His reticence alone raises questions. One need not be a 'conspiracy theorist' nor a 'tinfoil hat wearer' to wonder why he won't come clean on this.

23 posted on 12/09/2008 5:05:39 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida

Without a doubt, the vetting of a presidential candidate /> must be transparent and information must be readily available to the general public..this seems to be missing with mr OBUMA. I do not know if he meets the qualifications> for president with the current information available to the public and nor do YOU!!


24 posted on 12/09/2008 5:15:37 AM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Natural born citizen question: I’m natural born, married to a foreigner who still maintains foreigner status with a green card. Our children are all born in the U.S. and have dual nationalities.
By definition, are they, therefore, NOT natural born citizens because of the dual-nationality problem from birth?
This is the Donofrio argument, I believe. Frankly, I think this is in tune with the founding Fathers. What if my son, as POTUS, had to go to war with the country of his mother?


25 posted on 12/09/2008 5:16:33 AM PST by jackofhearts (Unko bachana kaun chahega (Who will want to save them)?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pissant

New Lawsuit Bump :)


26 posted on 12/09/2008 5:21:26 AM PST by bushwon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

IMO, I still think the best opportunity will be to win one at the lower court level, either at the state level or a lower federal court. This new case, or the Keyes case, or the WA state case..
That way SCOTUS will be under pressure to hear the appeal by the state Attorney General/SOS or they can just let the lower ruling stand.


27 posted on 12/09/2008 5:22:15 AM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bookmark


28 posted on 12/09/2008 5:24:29 AM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts; All
By definition, are they, therefore, NOT natural born citizens because of the dual-nationality problem from birth?

Although that is my understanding, I'm not an attorney, so I can't definitively answer the question.

I understand laws have changed since Obama was born, but I'd have to refer you to someone more knowledgeable.

Someone more knowledgeable care to weigh in?

29 posted on 12/09/2008 5:24:47 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You said — “We will pry the original birth records from his cold, marxist fingers... “

Yeah, I think — at least by — January 2017.... LOL


30 posted on 12/09/2008 5:28:36 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I think Democrats are bending the rules, taking advantage of a “grade school” assumption.

It's common thinking that if born in the US, you are qualified. But I think that logic derives from an old assumption that to be born in the US you must have had two US citizens as parents.

Two US citizens having a child provide the child natural born citizenship. There is no argument. But anything outside of that has some qualifications and strings attached.

31 posted on 12/09/2008 5:28:42 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
Apprently you have not read this:

The reality is, no court is going to act and the commie Senate will confirm Obama as the next president no matter if Obama was found to be the son of Osama born in Iran.

32 posted on 12/09/2008 5:29:51 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You said — “We’ll impeach his marxist butt”

Ummm..., you’re gonna have to face the reality of a Democrat controlled government. You do remember how well that worked with Clinton, don’t you?


33 posted on 12/09/2008 5:29:55 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

And..., when the Supreme Court comes back with an answer of “Denied...”, how is this analysis going to help?


34 posted on 12/09/2008 5:31:09 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

You said about another FReeper — “Thank you for all of your good answers. You, unlike some others, are NOT a quitter.”

Yes..., he won’t be a quitter, all the way through January of 2017.... LOL...


35 posted on 12/09/2008 5:32:52 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nobama08

i don’t believe Obama’s Certification of Live Birth is forged.

but it is irrelevant. his sister born in Indonesia is said to have one too, correct?


36 posted on 12/09/2008 5:33:50 AM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jackofhearts

Good point! Which makes what Obama is hiding more important.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


37 posted on 12/09/2008 5:34:12 AM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

You said — “Really? You have, of course seen all the missing documents?”

I know you’re not going to see the missing documents.

It’s apparent that Bush and the Bush Administration has done nothing to ensure that you see the documents, McCain and his campaign has done nothing to ensure you see the documents, even Palin has done nothing to ensure you see the documents, and the majority of the voting electorate is doing nothing to make sure you see the documents — and for sure, the Obama Campaign and incoming administration is going to *make sure* you do not see the documents — and lastly the Supreme Court is also making sure you don’t see the documents. LOL...

It appears that no one is going to see the documents... probably until after January 2017.... :-)


38 posted on 12/09/2008 5:37:27 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: King of Florida
Do you dispute this statement:

...the fact that Sen. Obama apparently has placed a doctored 'certificate of live birth' on the internet...?

39 posted on 12/09/2008 5:37:34 AM PST by Beckwith (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

It appears that no one is going to see the documents... probably until after January 2017.... :-)
>>>..............
lol right after the “Barrett report” is released I assume.


40 posted on 12/09/2008 5:40:58 AM PST by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
I know you’re not going to see the missing documents.

Wow. I am in awe of all the talents on FR.

Say, swami? Got any hot stock picks?

41 posted on 12/09/2008 5:41:01 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pissant
These will keep coming until the truth is known.

Because of his coverup, I want to see not only his birth records, but his school records, because of the possibility that he claimed to be a foreign student.

42 posted on 12/09/2008 5:44:23 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (NO Kenyan Usurpers in the White House - NObama !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nobama08
Why a COLB (certificate of live birth) forgery? That is the question. "

Could it be that he had to go with something that WAS on record, just in case it came to that. If he had forged the actual birth certificate, there would have been no way to get it into the official records in Hawaii.

So, maybe he altered the COLB to cover some other bit of information we weren't supposed to know, like nationality, religion, etc, that was derived from his actual birth certificate...wherever that is.
43 posted on 12/09/2008 5:44:23 AM PST by FrankR (“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant

another hero.

these brave people face real persecution at the hands of the messiah


44 posted on 12/09/2008 5:44:28 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

It doesn’t take a “clairvoyant” to see this one... LOL...


45 posted on 12/09/2008 5:46:41 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
Being a “libertarianist conservative” does that mean you don’t believe in the rule of law?

Being a lawyer as well means I believe in the rule of law. And if we are going to leave behind the rather specious if not utterly baseless claims of fraud and switch to a purely legal tack -- and let's even assume we can get beyond the issue of standing here, which none of these crackpots individuals ever will, see Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) -- what you are left with is a case that directly implicates the doctrine of nonjusticeability, AKA the political question doctrine. See Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217 (1962).

But by all means, strap on the tinfoil hats, forget about opposing Obama (and offering viable, conservative alternatives) on anything so silly as actual policy, and enjoy the journey down the Road to Marginalization. And thanks for putting the FR in FRinge.

I for one have had enough of this crap, as well as the foolish, ignorant cranks that have been polluting this place of late.

46 posted on 12/09/2008 5:49:16 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

You said — “These will keep coming until the truth is known.”

Ummmm..., yeah, when Obama writes his memoirs... :-)

Something titled like “If I had done it!” LOL....


47 posted on 12/09/2008 5:49:18 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pissant

it seems likely the powers that know the truth (if Obama’s own grandmother and Kenyan ambassador are to be believed)
would rather see Obama destroyed for a lifetime of living a lie, and America torn by Constitutional Crisis and civil disorder, by having it revealed AFTER he takes office

or to use it as blackmail- and blackmail potential is why Obama (about to become the commander of the worlds greatest military and nuclear power) would never even be able to obtain a US national security clearance - by standards that never seem to apply in his case


48 posted on 12/09/2008 5:50:37 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Well, if you have no special powers to predict the future, why are you on this thread badgering those who are working to change the outcome from what you predict, if the outcome you predict is not what you would prefer?

It makes me wonder.

The 'It'll never fly, Orville' types are a dime a dozen.

49 posted on 12/09/2008 5:51:54 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

How is posting dozens of redundant articles on a conservative Web site “working to change the outcome”?


50 posted on 12/09/2008 5:57:22 AM PST by Scarchin (Withholding judgement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson