Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer

Although I largely agree with the author’s writing, I did send an email and nit-pick one point.

The 20th was the first amendment to address a President elect’s failure to qualify and covers exactly what we are facing today. Further, 3 USC 15 sets out the precise method by which the Congress at its Jan 8 joint session, may object to and challenge the qualifications of the PE.

Our nation is not screwed (yet), we have a carefully thought out remedy.
What we need is for as many members of Congress as possible to show us they have some...
courage.

See my About page if you have time for a letter.


20 posted on 12/09/2008 9:18:34 AM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot

You said — “The 20th was the first amendment to address a President elect’s failure to qualify and covers exactly what we are facing today. Further, 3 USC 15 sets out the precise method by which the Congress at its Jan 8 joint session, may object to and challenge the qualifications of the PE.”

How is anyone challenging this in that forum going to get it past a majority Democrat Party who is going to insist on Obama... That ain’t gonna work... Just remember who is running the show now...

You don’t *really* think that Democrats are going to jeopardize their own political futures by admitting that they got it wrong with Obama, do you? LOL...


41 posted on 12/09/2008 10:29:13 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson