Posted on 12/10/2008 10:55:56 AM PST by jackofhearts
St Petersberg Times spoke with the DoH months ago.The St Petersberg Times fact checkers had running story on this back in June and actually contacted the HI DoH and were satisfied. When the birth certificate arrived from the Obama campaign it confirmed his name as the other documents already showed it. Still, we took an extra step: We e-mailed it to the Hawaii Department of Health, which maintains such records, to ask if it was real.
Its a valid Hawaii state birth certificate, spokesman Janice Okubo told us.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/jun/27/obamas-birth-certificate-part-ii/
(Excerpt) Read more at politifact.com ...
Yup, I’m to believe a MSM journalist.
Can you say “Dan Rather”?
So Obama sent them the real birth certificate? Could the state seal be seen on the back side? They are only going by what is on the front side. Again easily photo shopped if only the front side.
Yep, and Zer0 has not seen Blag since the election, nor have any of his thugs er guys.
O can get this monkey off his back by simply producing the birth certificate. I don’t see the problem...(/s)
Well, I’ve just read Okubo’s statement, and she does NOT say that it matches the original vault certificate or that it’s genuine. She says that it looks genuine. Gee whiz.
Or, to be precise, she says it looks like her own birth certificate FROM LAST YEAR (one of the problems with the forgery is that it uses last year’s border with this year’s date), and also that some flunky in the office thought he could see signs of the embossed stamp from the back (but that has been debunked by Polarik, too).
The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries a day about Obamas birth certificate, spokesman Okubo said.
I guess the big issue thats being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature, Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. Because they scanned the front you wouldnt see those things.
Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.
And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.
Still, she acknowledges: I dont know that its possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.
What do you all think? No good, when has this party ever been right?
What is the financial viability of this rag?
So the copy the St. Pete Pravda examined is the same as the birth certificate under seal, right??? Then why have one sealed???
Knowing the arcana of Hawaiian state statutes governing such documents as we do now, this statement is meaningless. It doesn't prove or disprove anything. Most statements by Hawaii officials regarding this issue, not uncoincidentally, fail to prove or disprove anything. And, that is logical, given the controversy and the legal maneuvering occurring over the question.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama really was born in Hawaii and he’s just playing a game of teasing conservatives.
If he has no qualms about making the document public, why limit who has access to it?
Hand it to the judge in these cases where there are people claiming that the document has not been released.
Or maybe it isn’t THE document, but a notice of record.
If there was nothing to this, why are there even hearings?
Kerry never did release his military records to his critics either, let alone his diary.
Thanks.
No, it is the same “Certification of Live Birth” that factcheck.org supposedlyl handled.
And I wonder if they actually handled it or sent the downloaded image to Hawaii.
The second image is a copy of the Certification of Live Birth document which has been repeatedly published on a number of web sites as the Official version of Obamas birth record from the State of Hawaii. This is no actual place of birth (hospital, plantation, farm, etc.) shown. See boxes #6a through 6d of the document shown in the first image. There is also no Department of Health official embossed seal on this document.
On November 1, 2008, the following email was send:
To The Honorable Linda Lingle Dear Governor Lingle,
I ask that you release all information that the State of Hawaii Department of Health has on Senator Barack Obama's Certificate of Live Birth documentation.
Certainly over 100 million or so Americans, our countrymen, who will be voting on November 4th, 2008 deserve to have this information be publicly made available to them as part of the information they will weigh concerning a candidate as each of them places their vote for President on or before this date.
I can think of no higher purpose for any government entity or branch, than to ensure full, fair, and accurate information is given about a Presidential candidate.
As you well know, the "COLB" or other documents presented as true copies by the Barack Obama campaign website are false and have been digitally modified. As you must realize, this falsification of a presupposed State of Hawaii "official" record, directly and indirectly damages all State of Hawaii real birth records.
These falsehoods from the Obama campaign are a direct attack on the integrity of your governorship and on the integrity of all records kept by the State of Hawaii.
When you took your oath of Office as Governor of the state of Hawaii, did you not also swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States?
By not addresses this issue how and fully, you are also directly denigrating the official State of Hawaii recognition of the birth record of my son who was born in Hawaii just several months after the date of the record(s) in question.
This issue MUST be answered by the truth. By not addresses this issue, you are not fulfilling your oath of office.
Resident of the State of Hawaii
1960 1963
As a response the following statement attributed to the current Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, Chiyome Fukino, MD and the current Registrar General per their joint press release on October 31, 2008 was returned by email: in part: Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures. Their complete public statement clearly made no references to the key data to be found in #6 boxes and well as the supporting data as in the #7 boxes in the first image.
In fact this response by the office of the Governor of the State of Hawaii was a very disingenuous and a fraudulent response to my original query.
If you had the responsibility to investigate, qualify and vet someone who is to be given a United States Military Top Secret, No Foreign Special Access Security Clearance including the nuclear weapons launch control codes, which document of the two images shown would you find acceptable as a genuine State of Hawaii government issued Record of a Birth in the State of Hawaii?
You be the Judge (Roberts, Souter, Ginsburg, Scalia, Stevens, Alito, Kenny, Breyer, Thomas). _______________________________
Did the article reproduce the text of the e-mail and, if so, what did it actually say and who signed it?
They also conveniently ignore the large elephant at the tea party. Forged or not this is a “Certification of Live Birth” not a “Certificate of Live Birth”.
Maybe they should ask Obama why he is e-mailing a digitized image of this document to their newspaper and to a friendly web site BUT REFUSES TO SUBMIT IT TO THE COURTS, which would end all of this madness.
P.S.: They don’t teach logical thinking in journalism school.
That statement is indeed weak, but wasnt the final chapter on what the State of Hawaii said. The KEY issue is whether Obama has records on file with state of Hawaii and do they match the CoLB that’s been publicly presented.
see here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2145278/posts?page=201#201
4) Now lets review the statement of the Hawaii officials:
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/17866037/detail.html
There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obamas official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record, DOH Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said. State officials said Saturday they have personally verified that the health department holds Obamas original birth certificate. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures, Fukino said.
So we have state of Hawaii vouching for existence of Obamas records. This makes the CoLB is a forgery claim even more dubious to irrelevent.
“I wouldnt be surprised if Obama really was born in Hawaii and hes just playing a game of teasing conservatives.”
I am 99% certain that is indeed the case.
Obama - a born in the USA socialist
Didn’t this all start with Mr. Berg, a Democrat, many months ago, not conservatives?
Both are genuine. One is the long-form, the other is the short-form CoLB. One was made in 1962 and the other in 2007.
The format is not the issue. The issue is whether the CoLB that Obama shared with factcheck and others represents the data on file with the State of Hawaii. that cuts to the chase of the issue. so this statement addresses that point:
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/17866037/detail.html
There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obamas official birth certificate. State law (Hawaii Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record, DOH Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said. State officials said Saturday they have personally verified that the health department holds Obamas original birth certificate. Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawaii, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obamas original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures, Fukino said.
Thank you for the information.
What do you think about what seems to be an assault on the natural-born citizen requirement for the presidency?
I remember hearing Orrin Hatch talking about changing the law for Arnold. After reading about this birth certificate controversy, I now realize that Congress passed a resolution for McCain, a naturalized citizen ran on the Socialist Party ticket (incrementalism!) without interference, and others are talking about this provision being antiquated.
Would the Supreme Court be interested in taking one of these cases simply because we seem to be at a turning point on this issue? It seems to me that unless they rule on it soon, the politicians/secretaries of state, etc., might just ignore this requirement.
Why doesn’t every citizen have standing on this issue? After all, each one of us would be harmed if a natural-born citizen became president in violation of the Constitution.
Correction: That is not a natural-born citizen.
EXACTLY --
No where in the press release statement by the Hawaii Director of Health does she say what is in the document she controls in regard to a place of birth. Like Farm, plantation, manger, hospital, pineapple field, surfboard etc. In 1961 there was a lot of farming done on Oahu.
The direct response I have received from the Governor of Hawaii's office did not address the place of birth question. If the 2007 document is genuine, why is there no embossed Hawaii Department of Health State seal visible.
Please prove to me that the 2007 document is a genuine original document issued by the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
No your gullibility on this vouch just makes your entire post dubious and irrelevant, along with your pretentious tagline.
I imagine what she really said was something like, "it looks like a valid Hawaii state birth certificate"
If she said it was one, especially based on being sent a print out of image obtained on the Internet, she was in violation of the law, since that would be confirming the information on it, and that she cannot do, except to those who would be eligible to obtain a certified copy. The St. Petersburgh Times does not fall into that category
This is the image they are taling about, same resoution and everything, and from the newspapers own site. Look for yourself and see if you can see any trace of the reverse embossing.
I certainly can not. I downloaded it, and then zoomed in to the point where the JPEG artifacts begin to be visible. No trace of any "seal". Try it yourself.
The later as the full article makes somewhat more clear.
Existence, yes. there are many ways for someone not a Natural Born Citizen to have a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth. And the Certification of Live Birth is much easier to forge, or just alter slightly to change any inconvenient entries to something more acceptable.
It doesn't address it at all. There has been no, zero, nada, confirmation of the contents of the CoLB that Obama "shared". What has been confirmed is the existance of a Certificate of Live Birth, not that what's on it confirms what is on the "shared" CoLB.
Correction:
...on being sent a jpeg file obtained on the Internet of an image...
Without the actual paper document, there is no way they could confirm it was real, or photoshop. Well, not with a cursory look at the image that is. Traces of photoshopping can be found, although the lower the resolution of the original scanned in image, the harder those are to ferret out conclusively. Working with an image that has been compressed (as jpeg images have been) is also problematic as their are artifacts of the compression process to contend with. But the metadate may show if the file has been touched by Photoshop, or other imagine manipulation software. In this case, it does. But even that doesn't prove the was modified, since photoshop could have been used to obtain the image from a scanner. It could also have been used, and probably was, to block out the certificate number, rather than just putting a piece of black tape over it before scanning. Makes a good excuse anyway for having Photoshop's fingerprints in the file.
“I wouldnt be surprised if Obama really was born in Hawaii and hes just playing a game of teasing conservatives.”
If so, it would be a different kind of proof of his ineligibility to be president.
I missed that part I guess, but that is even worse! Basically the person was just saying “Yes, this is a format we use”. Not stating it was actually his Birth Certificate!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.