To: Chet 99
The court said Monday it will weigh whether to stop the sorting and counting of wrongly rejected absentee ballotsWhy do we even bother posting the crAP that this organization puts out? It's strictly propaganda 24/7.
4 posted on
12/15/2008 3:15:41 PM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(All hail the Obamasiah! Kneel before Obamohammad!)
To: VeniVidiVici
"Wrongly rejected absentee ballots" means they've already made a judgment on them.
Is this an all-Democrat or mostly-Democrat court? I think someone said here the other day that they were all Democrats. In that case, they'll find for Frnaken, and the Supreme Court of the US may not see any reason to get involved.
If Franken can get within 133 votes, he's probably home free, since there is the precinct with the 133 ballots which may have been run through the machine twice. The additional 133 voters may not exist, but their votes will be added to Franken's total.
Are any of the RINO senators likely to jump ship if the Democrats get to 59...or will they just vote with the Democrats when it counts?
To: VeniVidiVici
Good point. You know the DNC has saved untold $MM because the press is in the tank for them.
6 posted on
12/15/2008 3:23:26 PM PST by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: VeniVidiVici; BradyLS
15 posted on
12/15/2008 3:46:53 PM PST by
an amused spectator
(I am Joe, too - I'm talkin' to you, VBM: The Volkischer Beobachter Media)
To: VeniVidiVici
"...wrongly rejected absentee ballots"Meaning "votes for Coleman," according to the AP, eh?
20 posted on
12/15/2008 3:59:03 PM PST by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?)
To: VeniVidiVici
Why do we even bother posting the crAP that this organization puts out? It's strictly propaganda 24/7.Because they pretty much have a monopoly on the information flow. It's the Left's Ministry of Information.
45 posted on
12/15/2008 7:35:15 PM PST by
TheThinker
(Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson