Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas (Obama's Washington case)
The Right Side of Life ^ | 12/16/08 | James Broe

Posted on 12/16/2008 6:54:14 AM PST by BP2

Broe v. Reed: Motion for Expedited Discovery, Subpoenas December 16th, 2008

Yesterday, DecaLogosIntl.org reported that James Broe, one of 13 Plaintiffs in Broe v. Reed, has filed a motion for expedited discovery and authority to issue subpoenas in Washington State Supreme Court:

http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf

Names and Designation of Persons Filing Motion

COMES NOW, James E. Broe, Kenneth R. Seal, Robert Baker, Mark Sussman, Stan Walter, Bill Wise, Andy Stevens, Ed Crawford, Jason Lagen, Louise Workman, Jocelyn Murcelli, Mike Murcelli and Kevin McDowell, by and through counsel of record Stephen Pidgeon, pursuant to RAP 17.3(a), the Rules of Discovery, CR 26-37, and CR 45 governing the issuance of subpoenas, and Move this Honorable Court for an order allowing the issuance of two subpoenas for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence in this case, and expediting discovery pursuant to the proposed schedule.

Relief Requested

Plaintiffs seek an Order allowing plaintiffs expedited discovery by means of two subpoenas, one to be served on the Secretary of State of the State of Washington, to discover the following items: I) the Declaration of Candidacy of Barack Obama as filed in the State of Washington; 2) all records concerning the candidacy and disallowance of Socialist Worker’s Party candidate Frank Colero within the Secretary of State’s office; and one to be served upon the Director of the Department of Health in the State of Hawaii, to discover the following items: 3) the Birth Certificate of Barack Obama in Hawaii, and 4) all supporting documentation regarding the registration of the birth of Barack Obama in Hawaii. Plaintiffs seek an order which establishes the following schedule.

Plaintiffs are to serve the Secretary of State of the State of Washington with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Friday, December 19, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ counsel Stephen Pidgeon no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; broereed; certifigate; corruption; crime; election; lawsuit; obama; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
The case is scheduled for oral hearing on Jan 8, coincidentally, the same day Congress counts the Electoral College votes.

More on the story here: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=1825

Very good news indeed!

1 posted on 12/16/2008 6:54:15 AM PST by BP2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BP2
The case is scheduled for oral hearing on Jan 8, coincidentally, the same day Congress counts the Electoral College votes.

Is it on the actual court calander? I doubt there will be oral arguments in the WA SC. It is the most corrupt state supreme court in the country and if you think they are going to follow the law, you are sadly mistaken.

2 posted on 12/16/2008 6:58:03 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

COLB ping


3 posted on 12/16/2008 6:59:11 AM PST by stockpirate (Let's start by watering the tree of Liberty with the blood of tyrants. Sooner not later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...

ping


4 posted on 12/16/2008 6:59:50 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

“It is the most corrupt state supreme court in the country and if you think they are going to follow the law, you are sadly mistaken.”

So should we just stop and not try?


5 posted on 12/16/2008 7:00:01 AM PST by stockpirate (Let's start by watering the tree of Liberty with the blood of tyrants. Sooner not later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BP2

“Broe v. Reed” has a haunting ring to it.


6 posted on 12/16/2008 7:00:02 AM PST by littlehouse36 (Forced charity is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: littlehouse36

Don’t sue me bro!


7 posted on 12/16/2008 7:06:47 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: littlehouse36

FYI: As a followup to the filing of a challenge to President-elect Obama’s votes in Washington state, the state Supreme Court has set an “en banc” conference for Jan. 8.

This means all of the justices participate in deciding whether to take the case, not just a department (half the court) or, as more usual, just the court commissioner. The challengers, James Broi and 12 others, are represented by Bellevue attorney Stephen Pidgeon


8 posted on 12/16/2008 7:10:15 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
and if you think they are going to follow the law, you are sadly mistaken.

So we sit and do nothing? Please, tell us what YOU are doing about this mess we're in.

9 posted on 12/16/2008 7:16:18 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Just Registered With the Conservative Party...RINO's can kiss my......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Ping! Here is the link to the MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY:

http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf


10 posted on 12/16/2008 7:17:42 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Stephen Pidgeon
11 posted on 12/16/2008 7:20:05 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Don’t sue me bro!

Dont "STAY ME," Broe!

12 posted on 12/16/2008 7:22:44 AM PST by liberateUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: liberateUS; nufsed
Don’t sue me bro!

Dont "STAY ME," Broe!

Don't REED my birth records, BROE!

13 posted on 12/16/2008 7:29:53 AM PST by littlehouse36 (Forced charity is an oxymoron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone; stockpirate

I am all for going after Obama’s constitutional qualifications for President.

When it comes to going after the corrupt justices on the WA SC, I take a back seat to NO ONE.


14 posted on 12/16/2008 7:29:56 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: atlbelle44

Thanks for the ping.

That is one of the most well-reasoned and well-written motions I’ve seen in these BC cases.

Coincidentally, I recently made a couple of posts about discovery and pre-action discovery in BC threads here.

I’d like to see a judge grant the motion and force the defendant to appeal or comply. of course, they’ll probably appeal, but it will be hard to show an abuse of discretion if the lower court writes a legally valid opinion.

Also, i think the media spin and perspective would have to change some if it came out that it is the “concealers” who are appealing and fighting this issue in the higher courts.


15 posted on 12/16/2008 7:31:40 AM PST by Canedawg ("The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
I never would have guessed that from your original post.
16 posted on 12/16/2008 7:32:06 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Just Registered With the Conservative Party...RINO's can kiss my......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan; NoGrayZone; stockpirate
When it comes to going after the corrupt justices on the WA SC, I take a back seat to NO ONE.

So what does this "going after" action include? How can we help?

17 posted on 12/16/2008 7:34:19 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
I never would have guessed that from your original post.

My original post was based on my personal knowledge of the corruption withing the Washington State SC and the offices of governor and AG.

18 posted on 12/16/2008 7:41:50 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
So what does this "going after" action include? How can we help?

I'll be in the USSC sometime in the next two months, and they will accept my case. The other stuff I can't discuss right now.

19 posted on 12/16/2008 7:43:41 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

And can you guess who plans to visit Hawaii on December 22?









Barack Obama that's who.

20 posted on 12/16/2008 8:59:28 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Hey, SeaHawkFan,

Please complete your “about” page here at FR with some background info on yourself and your interests.

Thanks.

And anyone else who has a blank page, please consider writing a line or two about yourself. Pictures of your hobbies, etc, are good too.


21 posted on 12/16/2008 9:10:12 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (Cultural conditions, not gun laws, are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BP2

I believe that there is a similar case to this in California as well.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


22 posted on 12/16/2008 10:00:06 AM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2; cripplecreek; stockpirate; LucyT; pissant; Frantzie; FreeAtlanta; hoosiermama; Calpernia; ...
Plaintiffs are to serve the State of Hawaii Department of Health with a Subpoena in the form attached hereto as approved by the Court no later than the close of business on Monday, December 22, 2008, and responses shall be served upon Plaintiffs’ ‘counsel. no later than the close of business on December 28, 2008.

This it for Obama.

Obama has been recently hobnobbing with influential people in Hawaii in the first week of this month. He will be in Hawaii for Christmas starting on the 22nd Dec. He's shopping around for help. Obama needs an expertly made long form birth certificate.

Under the premise that Obama is screwed. Obama goes for it by throwing millions of dollars in leftover campaign funds to get the best help, a forger. The forger will need a blank form of the BC long form circa 1961. He'll have to find a doctor or mid-wife signature and a doctor or mid-wife to vouch for it.. so they'll likely forge the signature of a dead one. The mid-wife would be easier for the forger to do. No hospital to deal with. He'll need an old typewriter. After Obama's forger has a grade A forged BC, he will have to replace it with the real one locked away. A switch operation. The easiest way is to bribe the people who have access to his real long form BC to do the switch with the bogus document, and to change the related computer database to reflect the bogus BC information. Mission Impossible? ;-)

The question is will Obama pull it off, or will he even attempt it? Or is Obama in Hawaii only for the sunshine? Or is Obama secretly in love with Governor Linda Lingle? LoL!

23 posted on 12/16/2008 10:07:48 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
He'll need an old typewriter.

That won't be hard. Finding a ribbon and paper from that long ago would be the real problem.

24 posted on 12/16/2008 10:17:33 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
For the longest, I wondered why it simply wasn't replaced or created by a forgery. Maybe, Obama and the various people involved are afraid they will be found out? With the media flying cover, I don't know why they would care if they were found out. The worthless "journalist" would just ignore the story.

Well, often, the coverup becomes worse than the actual crime (See, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton's blue dress). Hopefully, all this will cripple any far left-wing agenda that the Democrats-corrupt jerks- have.

25 posted on 12/16/2008 10:22:34 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Hopefully, all this will cripple any far left-wing agenda that the Democrats-corrupt jerks- have.

Yes, I predict if Obama survives his BC fiasco, he'll still have so many scandals flying around his head his communist agenda will suffer retardation.

26 posted on 12/16/2008 11:11:49 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Woo Hoo! “Don’t taze me bro!” Good news and more patriots not giving up. :-)

Leo liked Steve Pidgeon’s case but the problem may be WA state’s corruption. :-(

Best of luck to you and let us know if we can help. I have endless admiration for Leo, Cort, Orly, Pidgeon and others with the courage to stand up to the coup.

I read today in the WSJ that SCOTUS voted to allow a case of Gitmo terrorists that were subjected to harsh words. My guess is their pizzas at gitmo were not at the right temperature or the thread counts in the sheets were less than 700.

It seems like SCOTUS is more concerned with terrorists rights than citizens rights and the Constitution. I still have some faith in Scalia, thomas, Roberts and Alito.


27 posted on 12/16/2008 11:13:26 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; wolfcreek; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; ...

ping

Ok ...

... so Andy Martin files before the election on Oct. 18 (not his first motion, but his second motion):
http://contrariancommentary.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/andy-martin-hawaii-lawsuit-2-emergency-motion/

Then Obama goes to Hawaii, presumably to visit Toot on Oct. 24:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081024/NEWS05/810240360

Then Hawaii judge “conducts vigorous hearing on Obama birth certificate battle, reserves ruling” on Andy’s second filing, not closing it (takes it “under advisement) in mid-Nov:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2134526/posts

About the same time in mid-Nov, Toots has a funeral service, which Obama doesn’t attend: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Nov15/0,4670,ObamaGrandmother,00.html

Since then, Pidgeon’s case is accepted, and files emergency discovery: http://decalogosintl.org/documents/motion_to_expedite_discovery.pdf

Obama plans to celebrate Christmas in Hawaii, there on Dec. 22

The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

... dots for those who wish to connect them...


28 posted on 12/16/2008 11:34:09 AM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; torqemada; WKL815; Baumer; Robwin; Scutter; blasater1960; conservative cat; cherry; ...
Thanks to truth49 for the ping.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Say WA? Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

29 posted on 12/16/2008 11:59:04 AM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; BulletBobCo; seekthetruth; Kevmo; gunnyg; television is just wrong; browardchad; ...

~~PING!


30 posted on 12/16/2008 12:14:53 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated
Hey, SeaHawkFan, Please complete your “about” page here at FR with some background info on yourself and your interests. Thanks. And anyone else who has a blank page, please consider writing a line or two about yourself. Pictures of your hobbies, etc, are good too.

Or, just copy the the Civil War II ping list and Gadsen's Flag picture off mine. It looks like we may need both soon!


31 posted on 12/16/2008 12:17:45 PM PST by Jack Black (ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BP2

I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me? These state courts are coordinating? Obama is taking a suitcase full of cash to Hawaii to buy the judge? The race will be final before the first hearing is held?

The SC wiffed on this, right? What happene to Berg - dismissed, remanded back? What about the one that was last Friday. Did they dump it yesterday.

Someone needs to build a chart on the web with these.


32 posted on 12/16/2008 12:20:53 PM PST by Jack Black (ping can't be a tag line, can it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black; BP2
I’m sorry I never could connect those dot puzzles. Can you spell it out for me?

I'm with you, Jack. Please help us understand, BP2, and anyone else having a reasoned analysis. I'd love to read your theories about these actions.

33 posted on 12/16/2008 12:55:43 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Prayers for you.


34 posted on 12/16/2008 1:00:13 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BP2; katiekins1; MinuteGal; Blu By U; rodguy911

What Great News!!

Heard about this last night and wanted the details. Thanks for the details!

I believe there is more news to come that will begin to bring the truth to light!


35 posted on 12/16/2008 1:00:29 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BP2
The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

Who said the WA SC is going to hear oral arguments on this case? En Banc does not necessarily mean there will be oral arguments.

36 posted on 12/16/2008 1:00:45 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BP2
The Washington Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan 8, the same day Congress meets to count the Electoral votes.

I just called the WASC. There is an administrative conference on Januray 8 to consider the case. There will be no oral arguments on that date.

Because it is petition for a writ on mandamus against Reed, the WASC is required to issue a written decision addressing the law and the facts. On the other hand, just because the WA constitution requires that they issue a written opinion addressing the facts and the law does not mean they will actually do it.

37 posted on 12/16/2008 1:10:44 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This is promising! Continuing prayers for our country.


38 posted on 12/16/2008 1:13:23 PM PST by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Thanks for the clarification on that, SeaHawkFan.

Myself and others are trying to help them where we can. The biggest concern is the discovery phase. But I think Steve’s got it covered — he’s coordinating with other attorneys on other cases in other states...


39 posted on 12/16/2008 1:23:42 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated
I think some of our local members took down their "about" pages any facts that could ID them when we realized members of the press were investigating and printing our names, jobs, and where we lived, none of which was posted in the instance I'm thinking of (not me).

They don't just call this a Soviet Socialist state just because of the oversized, original statue of Lenin or the observance of atheism as a recognized religion, ya know.

40 posted on 12/16/2008 1:45:55 PM PST by 4woodenboats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Thanks for the pings STARWISE!


41 posted on 12/16/2008 2:13:06 PM PST by Deepest End ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." - Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

It does not matter if Washington Supreme court hears the case or not or when it will hear it. What is important is the order for discovery. If such order is granted, Steve Pidgeon will have a court order to gain access to the vault copy of 0bama BC. And if the vault copy shows what we think it will show, the news will spread like wild fire and it will be all over for 0bama or whatever his name is.

I have always said public pressure and not the justice system is the best course of action to finish the political life of a crooked politician.


42 posted on 12/16/2008 2:35:32 PM PST by ColdDecember (It is not just the BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BP2

Um, the language is from the plaintiffs’ application. No judge has signed the form of order yet, so why is this such good news? No one to whom the request is addressed has any obligation to do anything until and unless a judge signs the form of order, and there is no indication from anything I have seen here that that is going to happen...


43 posted on 12/16/2008 3:43:45 PM PST by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
Thanks for the Ping! Maybe the scotus waited for a state to make precedence.
44 posted on 12/16/2008 4:09:22 PM PST by katiekins1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Deepest End; penelopesire; BulletBobCo; seekthetruth; Kevmo; gunnyg; television is just wrong; ...

MUST see ~~

A Message To Our Electors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0


45 posted on 12/16/2008 4:15:44 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

PING to video ~~

A Message To Our Electors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0


46 posted on 12/16/2008 4:16:50 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Synopsis for those of us that are video challenged please. Thanks


47 posted on 12/16/2008 4:22:05 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black


Didn't know that the media would be so underhanded as to read FR and obtain info about the FReepers from their About Pages. So I guess I should clean up my About Page.

I got bullets for my birthday. Could I actually shoot to kill another human being? In a war, yes.

I just ordered my flag and some bumper stickers from www.gadsdenandculpeper.com
48 posted on 12/16/2008 4:25:21 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated (Cultural conditions, not gun laws, are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Yes, I predict if Obama survives his BC fiasco, he'll still have so many scandals flying around his head his communist agenda will suffer retardation.

Maybe, or maybe it will goad him into implementing as much as he can, as fast the hugely Democrat Congress will let him, before his political capital leaks away.

49 posted on 12/16/2008 4:29:37 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

It’s excellent .. very well done. You can’t see videos?
Hope that’s not true ... what you miss .. ;(

It explains the duties of the electors, cautions them
that country comes before party, that party pressure
is illegal, that the country has a right to know and
that part of their duty is seeing to the eligibility
of the candidate.


50 posted on 12/16/2008 4:29:37 PM PST by STARWISE ((They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson