Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Schemin' (Continued)
IBD Editorials ^ | December 23, 2008

Posted on 12/23/2008 6:56:28 PM PST by Kaslin

Initiatives: California's attorney general claims Proposition 8's amending of the state constitution is unconstitutional. He says it attempts to "extinguish" a "fundamental" right that has existed for all of seven months.


If Alice had emerged from Wonderland to marry George Orwell, they might have produced a child named Jerry Brown. In a Dec. 19 press release, AG Brown called on the California Supreme Court to invalidate the recently passed Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage, on the grounds that this constitutional amendment is unconstitutional. Got that?

According to Brown, "the amendment process cannot be used to extinguish fundamental constitutional rights without compelling justification." Note that California voters were not bringing back slavery. They were simply reaffirming the traditional definition of marriage.

First, the "fundamental right" to same-sex marriage is not explicitly defined in the California Constitution. In May the California high court suddenly said it was there, hidden underneath all those penumbras and emanations.

Citing a 1948 California Supreme Court decision that overturned a ban on interracial marriages, the court struck down the state's 1977 one-man, one-woman marriage law, as well as a similar law, Proposition 22, passed by referendum in 2000 with a 61% majority. It simply stated: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/23/2008 6:56:28 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Attorney General Moonbeam needs a swift kick in the *ss to remind him whom he’s working for.


2 posted on 12/23/2008 7:00:10 PM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Jerry Brown was govervor of California for 8 years and never said anything about this constitutional issue.


3 posted on 12/23/2008 7:00:24 PM PST by nickcarraway (Are the Good Times Really Over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Impeach/recall Jerry Brown.

Impeach/recall judges that defy the will of the people.

That’s the only tool left. A few judges thrown out of office will have a salutary effect on the rest.


4 posted on 12/23/2008 7:04:05 PM PST by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds like he’s pandering to a very small but extremelly vociferous minority if you ask me.


5 posted on 12/23/2008 7:05:29 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (The crux of the biscuit is the Apostrophe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“If Alice had emerged from Wonderland to marry George Orwell”... Yep, that line sums this news up; the world seems to be getting more and more bizarre.


6 posted on 12/23/2008 7:12:25 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Good commentary.
7 posted on 12/23/2008 7:13:56 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton
Top Runners for California Governator to replace AHNOLD
8 posted on 12/23/2008 7:49:16 PM PST by Foolsgold ("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The California constitution was ratified in 1879. Gay marriage was a hot topic back then so of course the framers made sure that it was covered. It’s been in there all along.

Got it?


9 posted on 12/23/2008 8:17:25 PM PST by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Jerry Brown's argument the people of California don't have the right to define marriage in their Constitution is absurd and insults the intelligence. Its absurd because the point of amending a Constitution is to give it clear meaning. Its an insult to the intelligence because marriage is rooted in divine and natural law and throughout history has never been viewed as as a union of two persons of the same sex. Ever. The former Governor Moonbeam apparently thinks his fellow Californians are too stupid to know what they were doing and his opinion is more valid than the 52% who voted for Proposition 8 last month. Why, he doesn't say.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

10 posted on 12/23/2008 8:22:41 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Let me see if I got this straight... In California they actually pay the Attorney General to subvert the people’s will?


11 posted on 12/23/2008 8:41:17 PM PST by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson