Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Cars Were Never Better — But It Probably Doesn’t Matter
NMA ^ | 12/24/08 | Eric Peters

Posted on 12/24/2008 7:19:49 AM PST by XR7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: NY.SS-Bar9

I disagree with you on this. I have a Ford Fusion that I purchased after trying Toyota, Honda, Volvo and Subaru and am glad I did. It gets great gas mileage, rides better and is quieter than all the rest. Ford has done a great job on this car.


61 posted on 12/24/2008 8:37:38 AM PST by thile44 (Simplicity is too complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: XR7

I just bought a Honda. We also bought a Scion this year. Both times we shopped, we first looked at Dodge/Chrysler and Ford for alternatives. (No GM, sorry, too many bad experiences).

Dodge and Ford have both cheaped out on their interiors in a BAD way. We paid much less for a much NICER Honda and Scion than the comparable Dodge and Ford vehicles.

The Honda replaced another Honda, but the Scion replaced a Ford. We had no problems with the prior Ford and would have gotten another one, had they had something decent for the money they wanted.

I looked at a new Chrysler van. I know people with the older version, and the older version is MUCH nicer inside. Our old Ford’s interior was MUCH nicer than the current Fords. What’s up with that? Did they think we would buy the vehicle without sitting in it?

In contrast, the newer Mazdas are looking great inside.


62 posted on 12/24/2008 8:37:47 AM PST by ReagansShinyHair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
Excpect that the Pinto had no more or less a propensity to blow up when struck from the rear than any other small car of its day.

You should always question what you "learn" on 60 Minutes.

63 posted on 12/24/2008 8:37:49 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: XR7

“Because for it to recover, we’ve got to recover first.

And no one’s offering us a bailout.”

Amazing how few people today grasp this simple idea. No, today’s “leaders” want to TAKE AWAY money from the very basis of the economy to “save” the economy.

Good luck with that...


64 posted on 12/24/2008 8:40:51 AM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: earlJam
One of our first cars was a Chevy Vega with a V8 in it. It was the cheapest car we could find at the time. Black exterior and interior, tricked out to be a street racer.

The day we bought it, we were driving around with our new born in the back and some guy with a tricked out Malibu or similar car flagged us down and offered to trade straight across. We didn't bite but still laugh today about that, he wanted it sooo bad.

65 posted on 12/24/2008 8:43:00 AM PST by thirst4truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: XR7

This is sort of like the end of WWII in reverse. The Germans had all sorts of advanced weapons just getting started or on the drawing board but it was too little too late. I have checked some prices of vehicles lately and some models are going dirt cheap in comparison to days of yore. Not sure this will save the big 3 though. Time will tell as always. I think if they can last there might be a turnaround for them.


66 posted on 12/24/2008 8:44:43 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

The rear door on our 2004 Ford Explorer cracked in half while sitting in our driveway. We had the rear differential rebuilt at 60K miles - and never towed anything with it. The dealer told us the problems were common, but repairs would be on our dime. Actually, close to $800 for the differential. We drive around with a cracked door as a warning to potential Explorer buyers...

I’m not looking to buy another Ford for a long time.

Yep. I blame Ford.


67 posted on 12/24/2008 8:49:51 AM PST by Mr Rogers (And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
JD Power track how people ‘Feel’ after 90 days.

CR has nearly 1,000,000 surveys returned each year tracking automobiles for 6 or more years.

68 posted on 12/24/2008 8:50:49 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: painter

“Put a Boss 302 or a 300 horse 289 in it and you had a street beast!”

You’re not a guy named Chris from Oakdale LI, are you” Back in about ‘75 a guy I went to school with did exactly that: Put a WORKED 302 into a Pinto. He left the original rear in until it blew(lasted about a month). He welded the nose together to form one unit that hinged at the front under the bumper. Did it all in his garage at home in a matter of weeks at the age of 19. I don’t know what became of him but if he didn’t get into custom car fabricating he damn well missed his calling


69 posted on 12/24/2008 8:51:06 AM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

“...And THERE is the crux of the issue. Yes, American cars have improved, but the foreign competition has improved more. And in many cases, those improved cars are built in American factories, by American labor.”

Amen.


70 posted on 12/24/2008 8:52:41 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
I had a ‘77 Firebird with the 305. Not a super quick car but a good ride & with that high geared rear end got decent highway mileage for the time.

Go forward a few years though and I think just about any 4 banger had as much or more power and way better mileage.

71 posted on 12/24/2008 8:52:52 AM PST by Clinging Bitterly (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

My first car was a ‘74 Pinto 2-door with a 2.0L engine and a four-speed stick. It burned almost as much oil as gas, but it never stranded me anywhere either.


72 posted on 12/24/2008 8:53:07 AM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (The crux of the biscuit is the Apostrophe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Corinth was flattened in 146 B.C. and resettled 100 years later. The Romans couldn’t leave a strategic location like that vacant.

I recall seeing an interview with Ricardo Montalban (sexiest voice I ever heard), in which said that he had no idea what “Corinthian leather” was supposed to be, but it sounded good.


73 posted on 12/24/2008 8:54:42 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Hairless men weird me out worse than hairless cats." ~Trailerpark Badass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: XR7
Anyone remember the Chrysler Cordoba with Ricardo Montalban and the "rich Corinthian leather"?

The original "lipstick on a pig."

74 posted on 12/24/2008 8:57:07 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XR7

VOLARE!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLTIQg_bjFI


75 posted on 12/24/2008 8:57:32 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gilor
HMMM, I had a 74 Duster (318) that had 170k on it and a friend of mine had a mid 70's Fury (225 Slant-Six) that had over 200K on it.

I think that the author was talking more about the late 70’s and 80’s cars that deffinately deserved the fowl rep that he describes.

76 posted on 12/24/2008 9:02:31 AM PST by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: XR7; painter
“friends mocking and making fun of you when they saw the ‘new car’”

You're one hundred percent wrong on that one. You may be thinking of the Pacer, or the Gremlin. Stylishly, the Pinto and Vega were pretty hip cars. While many teens had a car, they were usually family hand-me-downs between 5 and 10 years old. For a teenager in the early 70s, a NEW car was a big deal and most were small. After all, not many teens had enough money to afford more (parents seldom bought cars for their children in those days!)

My first new car was a fully loaded 1973 Pinto with a stick shift, that cost me $2,323. I loved that car! It was well-made, easy to maintain and got good gas mileage (30+ mph).

I later learned during my first year of college in one of my engineering classes that Ford execs had overruled their safety engineers and put the car into full production before a flaw in the gas tank filler-neck design was corrected. Although the engineers explained that the car would likely burn or explode in a rear impact, the Ford execs decided that they could more afford any losses from lawsuits than they could from the lost sales if they failed to beat the Chevy Vega on to the market.
A year later when the lawsuits started to appear, we knew the inside story and hoped Ford would be bankrupted for its callous disregard for lives.
They redesigned the car starting in 1974, and although they corrected the gas tank problem, they also cheapened the quality with a lot of plastic parts. The assembly quality also began to tank about then. By 1980, they had cars with WARPED dashboards in the SHOWROOMS!! I was a GM man by then. GM had problems with their cars also at that time, but they never seemed to sink quite as low as Ford or Chrysler.

IMO, much of the poor quality in vehicles in those days was due to the manufacturers experimenting with new materials to keep weight down to meet Government MPG standards; using new, unproven production processes to keep costs down due to increasingly outrageous union labor costs; and the general indifference to quality by that union workforce.

77 posted on 12/24/2008 9:04:53 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Publicity is reality.


78 posted on 12/24/2008 9:08:34 AM PST by Chickensoup (we owe HUSSEIN & Democrats the exact kind respect & loyalty that they showed us, Bush & Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

No that wasn’t me. I never built one,but I knew a guy who did. Boss 302 with a narrowed 9inch 3.91 track lock rear end.Nobody would run him.


79 posted on 12/24/2008 9:14:25 AM PST by painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Because, they didn’t think they could get a warranty fix out of the manufacture and it does not fit in their power train warranty.


80 posted on 12/24/2008 9:17:00 AM PST by depressed in 06 (Dope in chains, the Chicago way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson