Posted on 12/27/2008 2:51:24 PM PST by CE2949BB
Barack Obama may have an impossible burden of expectation on his shoulders, but one fervent wish of many US scientists should be easy enough to fulfil: simply lead the nation back into the "reality-based community".
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
Whose “reality”?
Lost me at global warming.
“Reality-based community” is Washington lingo for more government grants.
You forgot the barf alert.
I think he will work for that reality.
Three seconds after I posted it, I thought “Oh, crap! Barf alert!”
I think most people will be able to figure it out. ;)
It’s amazing what “reality-based” means to a liberal compared to a conservative like me.
I’ve been telling people for the past year that we need to confront reality. I had no idea that the libs had already taken the term and subverted it (read the Wiki article linked in the OP).
My version of reality-based community is:
Stop expecting others to take care of you.
Don’t spend more than you make.
If you think you don’t make enough money, work harder, or learn more valuable skills.
Conserve resources, but don’t kill the economy doing it.
Raise your own children.
Stop thinking you are the center of the universe.
Assume bad things will happen and plan accordingly. Be pleasantly surprised when planning makes bad things seem not as bad as you thought.
The liberal version is the exact opposite. It’s time to face facts that the libs and conservatives in this country need to split up and go our separate ways.
Here's some quotes which are very telling today
1. The Mock Turtle:"Reeling and Writhing, of course, to begin with, and then the different branches of arithmetic -- Ambition, Distraction, Uglification, and Derision." (sounds lock Algore!)
2. Alice: "If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?
3. The Cat: "We're all mad here."
Overnight temps down into the twenties and thirties in Southern California. It apparently rained and then iced over on my car the other night. You were saying?
an approach to HIV that focused on sexual abstinence
Based on the evidence (or rather the historical record) of how it spread, it seemed a good idea to suggest avoiding the behaviors most likely to get people infected with it. Apparently all realities are equal, but some realities are more equal than others.
"Scientists [sic] (read political prostitutes) were prominent among those cheering Obama's election victory on 4 November. A clear sign of the president-elect's new direction came two weeks later when he sent a video message to a conference on global warming in Beverly Hills, California. "The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear," Obama said. "Delay is no longer an option. Denial is no longer an acceptable response. The stakes are too high; the consequences too serious."
Hey BO, you too dim to notice the reality that the globe has been cooling for 10 years? There's no rush, other than to expand Big Government that is.

The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet |
The money tree needs lots and lots of carbon dioxide to thrive.
Liberals brag that they are champions of individual rights, yet their government actions place "group rights" above individual rights.
We had a consultant review the “science” funded by American Rivers for the Klamath dams. Turned out it was junk. They used a non-recognized experimental model on sediment transport, made a biased analysis of data to project few economic impacts and concluded that the sediment behind the dams was not toxic, when the 3 samples they actually took showed a dioxin level leathal to fish and injurious to humans. The state based additional studies on the “science” - sort of like building castle on shifting sands.
Some math prof. over at Humboldt State just completed a study on one of our local tributaries -damning agricluture for impacts on stream flows. A careful review of his figures show that they did not jive with the historic data from the DWR. His study is cr+p and he has been rewarded with a huge grant to study another river.
Today’s science is no more empirical and sound than the politics that paid for the study. Decisions have to consider a variety of factors. They can’t be just “science based.”
But then again,its been observed that liberalism shows many of the hallmarks of a mental illness.Maybe these liberals need to sharpen their observational skills.
It inverts the world and logic, by asserting that Bush policies were based on ideology, not observation and science.
The ongoing struggle (reality) is entirely the reverse, with assertions or smoke and mirrors (contrived computer models) displacing science solely for the benefit of ideology.
The result is well-meaning but destructive policies that spend gangantuan amounts on a socialist hunch, then invents a faux "science" to support the often uneducated guesses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.