Skip to comments.Obama's Kenyan birth evidence to be revealed today, online
Posted on 12/31/2008 6:25:00 AM PST by mlizzy
click here to read article
I guess the deaf and dumb investigator didn’t find a thing. Not that I thought for a second there was anything to this.
You said — “Maybe you and Jimmy the psychopathic college student see things the same way, same sense of humor, LOL, etc.”
I think that Chief Editor Korir was related in some way to Obama, as he has said, and he saw a way to do two things at once. One was to fool a lot of conservatives who wanted to believe whatever Chief Editor Korir said and also to “punish them” and do so out of his connections with Obama. The “chief” saw the “Dark Socratic methodology” as an excellent way to do it, and followed it just like he did. It did work beautifully, as far as a scam goes — and it did, definitely, prove a point (about that Dark Socratic methodology).
The other thing that the “chief” wanted to do, is to run up his website hits, because he was getting ready to branch out to another website and get some advertising to pay for it. He wanted a higher number of hits, for a while, so he could use those figures to boost his advertising revenues (at least for a while, anyway). So, the two things worked together.
As far as what part Ed Hale decided to play in all this, I just don’t know. And what part Berg decided to play in all this, I don’t know that either. I suppose they were duped, but that doesn’t say very much about what else they’re doing now...
As far as me, I’m just an observer who has noticed these things and I see that it’s possibly the very same type of scam that Chief Editor Korir perpetrated on everyone for weeks and months on end, thinking that they were going to get rid of Obama.
And so, I’m wondering what part this whole thing is playing into Ed Hale right now and Berg right now...
You said — “If Hales PI cant finish the job, someone else no doubt will.”
Be very wary if you see one delay and another delay and it’s always “just around the corner”. If you see this, just remember that this is what happened with Chief Editor Korir, and Ed Hale and Berg, with this whole Michelle Obama tape thing...
You said — “I guess the deaf and dumb investigator didnt find a thing. Not that I thought for a second there was anything to this.”
Well..., there is still a chance with the blind Muslim cleric, who escaped to England, who has Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate that he snuck out of the country...
As soon as Chief Editor Korir (of API, African Press International) is able to locate him, we’ll have Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate. It should be any day now. The only problem is that the blind Muslim cleric went into hiding when he got to England, because his life was in danger from the Obama people...
Now, if you don’t believe that, I’ll assure you that this is exactly what Chief Editor Korir was assuring everyone — was the absolute truth of the matter...
We’re still waiting on that blind Muslim cleric, too...
I’m really mixed up by all this. You are saying the “deaf and dumb investigator didn’t find a thing.” However, when I went to that Prairie website, it has Soetoro Divorce papers posted where it clearly states there are two children—one over 18 and one under 18. It looks like this is what he found. Am I wrong?
On January 9, now that the electoral process is over, the Supreme Court has scheduled a conference to consider Berg's writ of certiori, at which time they will agree to hear his appeal of the lower court's decision that denied his injunction to stay the electoral process because Obama is not Constitutionally-qualified to serve as President, thus paving the way for them to also agree to hear Berg's injunction to stay the electoral process until Obama proves that he is qualified, when they meet again on January 16, because both fall directly under part (c) of its Rule 10:
"(c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court."
The situation is clearly "an important question of federal law." And, although this will be the second time the Court has visited presidential elections, this will be the first time that SCOTUS will have been presented with a situation where a President-Elect may not be Constitutionally qualified to serve as President. Therefore, there are no "conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court."
I'm sure that the justices are rethinking what happened in 2000, and if this can happen once, it could happen again. There is no way that SCOTUS can see their decision as being anything but important, historic, and precedence-setting in interpretation of federal law and the Constitution itself. In other words, they will not pass on it.
The 2008 election has raised other, new constitutional questions which the Court feels obliged to answer, such as reaffirming the meaning of the natural-born clause, who has standing to challenge a candidate for President, and who has the responsibility for properly vetting a candidate, for starters.
If you are wondering whether at least four of the justices feel that the gravity of the issue warrants consideration by America's "Court of Last Resort" the answer is, "You bet your bippy it does."
When I was watching the Chief Editor Korir episode with the Michelle Obama tape saying that Obama was born in Kenya, I said “Good, glad to hear that” — but I also said — “I’ll wait to see how this pans out...”
And now I’m seeing that the good ole Chief Editor Korir showed us all “the door” and then slammed it shut... LOL..
And so, seeing how all this has been going thus far and seeing how Obama is trucking right along, on schedule, as any other President about to go into office — I’m going to see what happens on January 20th.
But, let me guess — there will be *another lesson* here on January 20th — and I’m sure we’ll also learn something new at that time, too...
I’ll be looking forward to your next installment — shall we say on, perhaps, January 21st, if that’s not too soon... Don’t leave me out, for sure... LOL..
He found a divorce decree that says nothing about Obama being born in Kenya.
If you were listening on the Plains Radio around 7:45 Wed evening (last night), I was the guy who called in from Texas. Let me assure you that the 1964 divorce decree from Hawaii is NOT a hoax — it does exist.
With info that Ed gave me on Tuesday night off the air, I coordinated to have the package pulled at the ramp in Honolulu, placed into a Fed-Ex Next-Day envelope by a person at the terminal to get Ed the next day for last night's show. It was originally scheduled for Two-Day Delivery for some reason — I think either by the PI or as as standard procedure of the Hawaii Courts. However, we WERE able to change the package to Next Day (afternoon) Delivery.
It arrived at LAX on time, shortly after midnight. HOWEVER, we hit a snag — the aircraft broke for approx 4 hours, apparently awaiting a part. The 747 finally took off at 6:47 am Wednesday, bound for Memphis, FedEx’s main hub.
As the morning passed, we began to realize that the package would not get to Ed's local FedEx hub, and then out on a delivery truck to get to him. We tried to transfer it to another location to be picked up at that FedEx depot, to scan it for Wed's show. However, we couldn't pull it off in time to make a departure on Wed afternoon.
Ed will have it Friday at a changed location. Arrangements have been made — it's very safe.
Additionally, I personally spoke with the PI in Hawaii myself Wednesday morning. Let me pass on what I can relay at this time:
- as I understand, because the decree was Certified, it came straight from the Court House to Ed; the PI did not have the opportunity to copy or fax it. (If you've ever ordered an old deed or lien that has to be copied from archived records or microfiche, it's much the same — it's mailed directly to the requester ...)
- The PI did seem to have looked at the Digest version of the Divorce Decree, not the full version Ed is getting. His words to me, was “it's very interesting”
- The PI did not know if the document indicated Obama Jr's place of birth. However, in the early 60s in Hawaii, the place of birth oftentimes does appear in the notes.
- He told me also that the divorce decree was VERY hard to find and not readily searchable — not just a $30 fee at the counter. Significant research had to be conducted. It seems to have been hidden, possibly by Ann Dunham in her youth. (IMO, if it HAD been found already, Berg would have put it on his site along with other docs he's posted: http://www.obamacrimes.info/justthefacts.html. This is NEW documentation)
- The PI indicated that there's evidence that Ann used at least one alias tied to this. It's common knowledge that she used many names (Dunham, Soetoro, Sutoro, and variations thereof).
- There are other copies of the Divorce Decree going other places — the one going to Ed is NOT the only copy! There are back-ups going to other parties.
Thank you very much for the explanation!
Well, we won't have to wait that long for the fireworks. January 8 is the date to circle on your calendar.
Thank you, BP2.
Update Ping. Check out #329.
Plains Radio Friday night:
Obama’s Kenyan birth evidence to be revealed today, online
Q: Does Barack Obama have Kenyan citizenship?
A: No. He held both U.S. and Kenyan citizenship as a child, but lost his Kenyan citizenship automatically on his 21st birthday.
No, the copy of the divorce decree that Ed Hale is to receive tomorrow 01/02 is the divorce document of Obama’s father and mother. The document you mentioned above it that of Obama’s step father and his mother. What the document states as far as information concerning Obama birth date and place of birth remains to be seen. Ed Hale “believes” it states place of birth as Kenya, but Ed Hale DOES NOT KNOW THAT TO BE TRUE. He has not seen the document and will not see it until sometime tomorrow.
It is a shame that Ed Hale lead listeners to believe that the PI stated the document showed birth place of Kenya, when come to find out, the PI did not say that! Then Ed Hale had to say last night that he DOES NOT KNOW and he must have gotten mixed up about what the PI said due to him being hard of hearing. Wish Ed had not done that and waited to verify the document and verify what the document actually says BEFORE making statements about it.
Are you embellishing? FedEx does not fly 747's. None.
And FedEx would not have a 0247 am departure out of LAX for MEM anyway. At least not one that carried overnight express (freight Charters maybe another thing). All flights carrying Express to Memphis, need to arrive at the Hub in the hours before 0130 CST in order take make the sort.
You said earlier today that “jimmy” who posted those videos is Jimmy Korir the Chief Editor. You said that the guy posting the videos, and Chief Editor, are one and the same. Now you say they are not.
Maybe you ought to type fewer words, but more understandable words that don’t contradict other words that you typed.
Confusing, but here goes...
Ed thought, at first early afternoon on Tues, it was going to be next-day delivery.
Then several hours later, he discovered it would be two-day delivery. By that point, the word had already spread like wildfire that it would be revealed on Dec. 31.
We made some calls Tues night and got it moved to Next Day (p.m.) delivery on Dec. 31, before it was “containerized” on the ramp on Honolulu.
It was destined to make it to Ed on Dec. 31, but the aircraft carrying the package broke on the ground at LAX for 4 hours. Because there are no regular “mainline” FedEx flight ops on Jan 1, it was just “late enough” to NOT be able to make it out to Ed on Dec 31.
That’s when we decided to “secure it” and let it remain on the usual schedule.
This is worse than watching Inside Addition. They keep saying coming up next and it never comes up. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.