Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Arabs Believe In Force Fields (Interesting!)
Strategy Page ^ | December 26, 2008

Posted on 01/02/2009 12:07:35 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Many Pakistanis now believe that the recent Islamic terrorist attack in Mumbai, India, was the work of the Israeli Mossad, or the American CIA. Such fantasies are a common explanation, in Moslem nations, for Islamic terrorist atrocities. Especially when women and children, and Moslems, are among the victims, other Moslems tend to accept fantastic explanations shifting the blame to infidels (non-Moslems).

Conspiracies are not unique to the Moslem world, but they are much more common there. After the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, many Moslems again blamed Israel. A favorite variation of this is that, before the attacks on the World Trade Center, a secret message went out to all Jews in the area to stay away. Another variation has it that the 19 attackers (all of them Arab, 15 from Saudi Arabia) were really not Arabs, but falsely identified as part of the Israeli deception. In the United States, some Americans insist that the attack was the work of the U.S. government, complete with the World Trade Center towers being brought down by prepositioned explosive charges. While few Americans accept this, the Moslem fantasies are widely accepted in the Moslem world. Even Western educated Arabs, speaking good English, will casually express, and accept, these tales of the Israeli Mossad staging the attacks, to trick the U.S. into attacking Afghanistan and Iraq. Americans are shocked at this, but the Moslems expressing these beliefs just shrug.

American troops arriving in Iraq go through a real culture shock as they encounter these cultural difference. They also discover that the cause of this, and many other Arab problems, is the concept of "inshallah" ("If God wills it.") This is a basic tenet of Islam, although some scholars believe the attitude preceded that religion. In any event, "inshallah" is deadly when combined with modern technology. For this reason, Arab countries either have poorly maintained infrastructure and equipment (including military stuff), or import a lot of foreigners, possessing the right attitudes, to maintain everything. That minority of Arabs who do have the right attitude towards maintenance and personal responsibility are considered odd, but useful.

The "inshallah" thing is made worse by a stronger belief in the supernatural, and magic in general. This often extends to technology. Thus many Iraqis believe that American troops wear sunglasses that see through clothing, and armor vests that are actually air conditioned. When they first encounter these beliefs, U.S. troops thought the Arabs are putting them on. Then it sinks in that Arabs really believe this stuff. It's a scary moment.

However, many troops learn to live with, and even exploit, these odd beliefs. When troops at one base discovered that they weren't being attacked much, because many of the locals believed that the base was surrounded by a force field, the troops would casually make reference to their force field, when they were outside the wire and among the locals. This reinforced the force field myth, and made the base safer. Other troops would invent new fantasies, like a pretending that a handheld bit of military electronics was actually a mind reading device. That often made interrogations go a lot quicker. Not all Arabs believe in this stuff, and those that didn't and worked for the Americans, often as an interpreter, could only shrug their shoulders when asked about it.

This easy acceptance of fantasies is exploited by leaders throughout the Middle East, and the Moslem world in general. Leaders who know better, build on these fantasies as a way to maintain their control over the population. The problem is a dirty little secret in the Moslem world, that leaders and academics don't even like to discuss it openly, much less with infidels. But it is real, and you can read all about it in the local media, or overhear it in the coffee shops.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arabs; conspiracies; forcefield; forcefields; india; inshallah; iraq; islam; jihad; mumbai; muslims; pakistan; quran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last
To: muawiyah
Right, 60,000 Jews were sent packing, 80,000 were converted, and virtually no Moslems left outside of the post-Reconquista property owners and elite (and even if they'd wanted to convert, that particular class was unwelcome).

They were converted -- the Marranos and M... (can't remember the term for Moslem converts) and yes, many did go to live in Morrocco.

Spain destroyed its industrial base in 1492.

What "industrial base" are you talking about? There was no "industry"

The discovery of gold in the Americas circa 1521 allowed their bankers in Belgium to pay their bills, but, alas, sometimes it's good to have your own industrial workforce and machinery around.

Belgium didn't exist until 1830. The entire area was the Spanish Netherlands (Hapsburg territories).

By 1600 Spain had lost its most ambitious people to the Americas, the gold ran out, Portugual (a more enlightened place) was seizing back its independence, and Spain was spent.

Portugal was independent right from 25th July 1139, after the Battle of Ourique. This was way before Spain (i.e. the rest of Iberia). Portugal was independent of Castile, Leon and Aragon and the Castile-Aragon union of Spain throughout. It was in personal union with Spain under Philip I from 1580 until 1640, only 60 years.

The 1500s were hardly any kind of decline for Spain. The decline only started in the late 1600s with the rise of the northern Netherlands and England and then through to France's rise under the Sun King until the 1700s and the wars of Spanish succession which is when Spain started to decline (that's good reading).

Spain's nadir was during the Napoleonic wars and it was then that Bolivar's ideas were sown.

This wasn't due to the expulsion of the Jews, deplorable though that was, in the 1400s.
141 posted on 01/06/2009 9:09:14 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Some people like to use the "old names" for places, but I prefer to just use the "modern name" for the exact same place.

You'll find that when virtually any historian says "Belgian Banker" for that particular period he or she knows that everybody else knows exactly who they're talking about. If you want to follow the physical flow of gold from the New World to the Old World it's also understood you'll be looking at places like Belgium. If you get real specialized and want to follow Philippines gold, it comes across the Pacific to Mexico and across Mexico to any one of several Spansh port cities, then on boats that sail past Florida and then on to Europe (usually Belgium). The silver from Potosi takes a different route.

Now, regarding converts, it had been the practice up to the time of the expulsions to just leave the "industrial base", other wise known as Jews, alone regarding their religious affiliations. They (meaning Spanish authorities whether Christian or Moslem) simply weren't in the business of proselytizing among the Jews ~ after all, most of them hated Jews, with or without their religion.

Interesting to read through the Spanish laws of the time ~ see what the position of Jews really was. Since they were not nobles they'd not be allowed to stay in cities after conversion, so what would they do for work since neither peasants nor nobles were artisans.

Now you may disagree with Spain having a real "industrial base" but they did relative to everyone around them ~ see Toledo ~ steel ~ that ought to be enough to get you up to date.

The 1500s saw the rise of France. Even UK wasn't all that easy a target to knock off. By the 1600s Sweden was the powerhouse, with France a close seond.

Spain didn't get to its hollowed out state in the early 1600s without some earlier "rot".

142 posted on 01/06/2009 9:29:26 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is a creature called the camel spider, a giant, spider-like thing that leaves nasty bites, found in Iraq and around the Middle East. It was an annoyance to troops in Iraq, and some Saudis believed it was a blessing from Allah to hinder the American invaders. Strange, superstitious people indeed. Islam has hindered the mental development of the Arab world. The Western world at one point had superstitions (black cats are evil, etc) but we’ve for the most part grown out of that and advanced. The Arabs are still stuck in the 7th century. But even then, Islam had a hard time establishing itself. Muhammad’s band of Muslims was initially very small, and were kicked out of Mecca by the original inhabitants. It was only by force that Islam spread.

I read a MEMRI article awhile ago about a Kuwaiti guy who as one of the few intelligent Arabs out there. He slammed the Arab world’s obsession with conspiracy theories and told them to take responsiblity for their actions and quit blaming Israel and America. He died of brain cancer not too long ago, though.

However, let’s not forget that we’ve got our own share of nutjobs, some of which are well-educated, who also believe 9/11 was an inside job, and believe in stuff like global warming, UFOs, we never landed on the moon, Obama is the messiah, etc.


143 posted on 01/06/2009 9:38:23 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (The Middle East: We put the OIL in TURMOIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The physical flow of gold from the New World didn't go through the Netherlands in any way. The Netherlands until the 1600s primarily had textile and lace "industries" and manufactured lace, etc. for export. No bankers -- the bankers were in Italy, in Genoa, etc.

Philipines gold? That was never in any way comparable to that from the New world. There are descriptions of Spanish expeditions from the 1570s but no big mother lodes of any sort. Besides the path from the Philippines to Spain was via the Cape of Good hope, not the Pacific

Now you may disagree with Spain having a real "industrial base" but they did relative to everyone around them ~ see Toledo ~ steel ~ that ought to be enough to get you up to date.

Toledo steel wasn't made by Jewish tradesmen. The Jews were maltreated by both Ms and Cs and so they resorted to the trades they COULD practise, namely trading, money lenders, etc. (no real concept of banking until the italian bancos).

France wasn't really a power in the 1500s and neither was England -- Henry VIII was subordinate to the Spanish King at the time while the French were consolidating their lands. This changed in the later 1600s due to the War of Spanish Succession
144 posted on 01/06/2009 9:47:27 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

BTW, the Portuguese colony established by the Carvajal family in Labrador in 1531 was shut down about 1535 due to the Spanish takeover of Portugal.


145 posted on 01/06/2009 9:47:51 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

In fact, if you read the Rig Veda you see more clear mention of the Panch jab (Panjab) and also long treatises on the Asuras Varuna and Agni and the daveas Indra, Yama, etc.


146 posted on 01/06/2009 9:49:29 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
There's a time sequence that correlates with an Eastward movement. The oldest stuff was developed further West.

There are also little inclusions that come from other sources ~

147 posted on 01/06/2009 9:54:35 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Some are Jewish as well. The Mizrahi Jews are Arabs.

And remember, for the majority of their history, Arabs were not Muslims. Ishmael was born about 4000 years ago, whereas Islam is only 1400 years old. You know Petra in Jordan? The Nabataean Arabs built that 3000 years ago. Nowadays Muslim Arabs (and non-Arabs) build suicide vests. Islam has caused them to devolve into a primitive society that can’t maintain itself without leeching off of Western technology and enslaving others to do their work for them. And then they blame us when some of their own blows something up (9/11 for example).


148 posted on 01/06/2009 10:00:39 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (The Middle East: We put the OIL in TURMOIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat; All

Well said and all important points to remember.

All peoples need to free themselves from that awful cult called islam - many have been freed from Marxism so it can be done.


149 posted on 01/06/2009 10:04:42 AM PST by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! + In this sign Conquer! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
1535 due to the Spanish takeover of Portugal

No, Spain never "took over" Portugal. There was a personal union and nothing moved further than that in 60 years as I said in my earlier post

in 1535, Portugal was also taking over the post of Diu so no "take over of Portugal" -- in fact the personal union only happened under Philip in 1580 -- 45 years after your date
150 posted on 01/06/2009 10:05:11 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There's a time sequence that correlates with an Eastward movement. The oldest stuff was developed further West.

The "oldest stuff" as you put it, IS the Rig Veda and no, it wasn't developed anywhere NEAR Mesopotamia -- as Mesopotamia had it's own mythos (as I keep repeating, the Enuma Ellish) which doesn't relate in any way to Aryanic ethos or the tales in the Rig Veda.

There are also little inclusions that come from other sources

I asked you for examples.
151 posted on 01/06/2009 10:07:21 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat; eleni121
I would add in that not all the people we call "arabs" are really "Arabs". The Berbers from Morocco to libya are nearly 100% descendents of the Imazhigen, albeit arabized. Egyptians are still, mostly coptic /ancient Egyptian in origin. Sudanese, the same. Even amongst the Semitic peoples, the Syrians are of Aram, the Lebanese of Phoenicia/Canaan, the Iraqis are Assyrians/Iranis/Kurds(aka Medes) and the Yemenis are South Semitic peoples. the only true "Arabs" are from the Najaf.

The Nabateans, like the Amorites before them were a Semitic people from the Arabian peninsula, but not the Bedouins (who are the true Arabies).
152 posted on 01/06/2009 10:11:53 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Interesting. A little unrelated, but I've also noticed that many Arab countries have very low death rates (that is, natural death, not death by terrorism and such). The UAE has the lowest, and many of the lowest are all Middle Eastern countries. (Source). I know dry desert air is good for curing tuberculosis, and I imagine that since viruses need wet and warm places to survive and that UV light destroys their genetic material, a desert would do them in.

(Notice that Iran and Iraq, which are not predominantly desert and have mountainous regions where it gets quite cold, are higher up on the list).
153 posted on 01/06/2009 10:16:48 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (The Middle East: We put the OIL in TURMOIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

the Iraqis are Assyrians/Iranis/Kurds(aka Medes)

Modern Iraq is 80% Arab; the rest are Assyrians, Kurds, Chaldeans, Turkomen, etc. Of course, the only reason the Arabs got there is by conquest. They were not native to the region that is now Iraq.

154 posted on 01/06/2009 10:21:27 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (The Middle East: We put the OIL in TURMOIL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Some of this is a matter of perspective. Let's start circa 1420 or thereabouts with the family of Rene of Anjou. Besides being Jeanne'd'Arc's political sponsor at the French Court, one of his wives was the daughter of a French king. He himself was a descendant of other French kings. He counted Leonardo d'Vinci as a personal associate, and fought a war on behalf of King Francis to bring Leonardo to France.

He also had several concubines, and a second wife (of nearly as illustrious a group of royal forebears as himself).

So, why bring him up? Well, he turns into an ancestor of Henry VIII, Philip of Spain, Isabella AND Ferdinand of Spain, most of the Hapsburgs who were capable of walking and chewing chiclis at the same time, and, lo and behold, he actually had Christopher Columbus as an employee at one time.

To say the French and Spanish crowns were closely related is to say the least. By the late 1500s Rene had become an ancestor to the next half dozen Swedish kings (all Protestant).

The "family", as its called, is still pretty tightly knitted (as families go), but back then it owned everything. Didn't matter who found the gold or brought it to Europe, it ended up in the same place every single time.

One of the places it tended to not go was Espagna. Instead, it went to the creditors.

Now you might not think Philippines gold was worth all that, but it was, and it traveled through the backdoor lest Spanish ships be boarded by such nice people as Dutch, French, Portuguese, Arab, Thai, Hindu, Malay and African pirates. There were lots of them around in those days.

Now, about banking, Venice started out on its own with the First Doge some time in the 7th century AD.

Those old boys invented double entry book-keeping. They also figured out how to monetize debt.

I think your reference to "banking" is to a more "modern banking" situation with internationally transferable "letters of credit". Spain had had access to that through its affiliation with the Islamic Caliphate starting in the 8th century AD right up to the 16th century. Of course even the Babylonians had banking and bankers thousands of years ago.

155 posted on 01/06/2009 10:23:58 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

yup i understand....but is was sort of a failure all in all
....


156 posted on 01/06/2009 10:24:12 AM PST by ffff (:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Your belief in “tidiness” aside, the Spanish shut down the Portuguese permanent colony in Labrador. Apparantly word to “leave stuff alone” never made it to the Amerias.


157 posted on 01/06/2009 10:25:50 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I do believe you've forgotten that the guys who invented writing in Mesopotamia were neither Indo-European nor Turcic, nor Semitic.

In fact, the closest ancient cognate languages to Sumerian are DRAVIDIAN, and the closest modern languages to Sumerian are Sa'ami (which have a large input of words from another non-Indo European language group in North Asia).

Their "beliefs" were a tad different than the standard Indo-European "god set", and were decidedly different than anything developed by the neighboring Semites.

What you have to do is go back another millenia and things will become much more familiar. Otherwise we'd have to believe that the Dravidians who penetrated Mesopotamia 7 to 10 thousand years ago managed to cast off all their own cultural baggage to embrace beliefs which would not be invented for another 4000 or so years.

There's been a lot of back and forth movement from Punjab to Helsinki over the ages. The Aryans who acquired domesticated horses used them to track back to where local stories indicated they kept the good stuff.

158 posted on 01/06/2009 10:42:10 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/39056/title/Spanish_Inquisition_couldn%E2%80%99t_quash_Moorish%2C_Jewish_genes

Recent piece on DNA studies of Spanish men. Seems lots and lots of Jewish (and earlier Phoenician) guys stayed behind, as did North Africans, et al.

Genealogists have been saying for years that 20% to 25% of Spanish ancestry (outside of Galicia and the Basque country) is of Jewish origin. These studies suggest 20% is right on target. Another 10% is attributed to North Africans (Berber) and Arab ancestry.

A quote worth remembering: "Studies such as the new one “tell the true history of everyone’s ancestors and not just the history book lessons of kings and queens,” says James Wilson, a population geneticist at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland who was not involved in the study."

No doubt it became popular at some time in Spain to believe that all the Jews and all the Moors "went back where they came from", but they didn't!

159 posted on 01/06/2009 1:02:11 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; martin_fierro; Fred Nerks

Thanks AdmSmith!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2157509/posts?page=118#118


160 posted on 01/06/2009 3:26:53 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________First 2009 Profile update Tuesday, January 6, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson