Skip to comments.Freepers Please - Stop posting on these silly Clinton...
Posted on 01/06/2009 9:13:31 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
... Charges that he has had extra-marital affair. So what? Who cares?
I know I'm a little bit late on posting this vanity and I know that some people may read into this thread more than I intended but here goes.
I just wish that all the Freepers posting negative remarks about Bill Clinton's sexual escapades would just shut up.
The next time I see some Freeper post yet another news story regarding the rumors of Clinton's infidelity, I'm gonna go find and post a picture of the "Aw Jeez" guy.
Don't you know that any and all of the articles you post regarding the Paula Jones/Jennifer Flowers sex scandal allegations make us all look like tin-foil hat wearing conspiranoiacs? Why don't we focus on the real issues? It's not like these personal matters would ever lead to anything - like an impeachment trial - anyway
Besides, Clinton has denied all these rumors and even Factcheck.org has proven that he is innocent. So please the next time you feel the need to post a thread regarding his birth certi . er, I mean his sexual infidelities, just don't do it.
They don't matter.
They were wrong then just as they are wrong now.
Yeah, it makes FR look bad
I bet you think this thread is about you, don’t you?
(apologies to Carole King)
I was one of those who believed the Lewinski scandal was just a conspiracy theory. I wasn’t a FReeper then but I was wrong about it just the same.
I’ve learned my lesson. If there’s smoke there’s fire.
Add Carly Simon to your apology list.
I think you mean Carly Simon.
Thanks, you are so right. I wonder how many won’t get your message and call ibtz. LOL.
Another lecture about what we're allowed to say around here...
I love freerepublic.
Read the article carefully again. You didn’t get it apparently.
“Don’t you know that any and all of the articles you post regarding the Paula Jones/Jennifer Flowers sex scandal allegations make us all look like tin-foil hat wearing conspiranoiacs? “ “Besides, Clinton has denied all these rumors and even Factcheck.org has proven that he is innocent.”
Is this humor? Sarcasm?
I feel the same about those who want to post endless dribble about our 2nd amendment rights but do not support COLB.
Geeez, enough posts already about the 2nd amendment, if you don’t care about COLB then yuou really don’t care about the US Constitution.
Besides, I will wait for star traveler to read this post and tell me what to think.
Oops - I do mean Carly Simon.
(this reply also goes out to all other FReepers who may catch my mistake!)
At least I got the pic out there.
Maybe Cyber did - maybe not.
But at least the “Aw Jeez” guy showed up!!!
Yes. And yes.
FactCheck.org is great fiction, especially when it comes to the Bent One (no offense).
I always thought the beauty of this site was that we could talk about subjects deemed verboten by the MSM.
BTW was Bill Clinton found guilty of lying under oath and disbarred?
When Republicans get caught in these types of scandals, it is usually curtains.
Bill Clinton had an affair?
Why didn’t anyone tell me? What happened?
I’m shocked...shocked that there is gambling in this... no wait that’s not right
“Is this humor? Sarcasm?”
You REALLY can’t tell? You obviously don’t read the “Secret Birth Certificate” threads!!
I think so. Does it involve a parachute and a plane?
Or was it the one about the the flight attendant offering a drink to Clinton and Billy Graham during the flight?
“Should Obama skate on this, it is still instructive in that it draws out and identifies the nay saying, Obama protecting, lib trolls”
you mean star traveler?
This VANITY is an insult to all who were here during the Clinton Years. This is Jim Robinson's site not yours. You should mute yourself or start your own site where you can dictate it's content. Buh bye.
Very good of you to discredit Carly Simon for that song and give it to Carole King!
Oh, how boring. If people don’t like what’s under discussion (try visiting a celebrity gossip thread :-), you say, “Pphhhht!” and ignore them. Nobody sets the content rules but JimRob.
Hopefully by now - You have read the thread and know that it is NOT INSULTING to anyone.
Except Obamabot apologists.
And I assume you are not an Obamabot.
He appears on almost ALL COLB threads and posts really long comments and they make no sense, he calls those who don’t think he is correct idiots and never answers questions.
“Besides, Clinton has denied all these rumors and even Factcheck.org has proven that he is innocent.”
Naive little critter, aren’t you?
He screwed a nation.
Do you mean “politically correct” speech?
We willingly give away the right of speech for politically correctness - why not other reasons?
Who are the politically correct speech authorities? I always wanted to know.
Hm....maybe there ought to be outrage at the Lord’s name taken in vain to make it “politically incorrect” also. Those politically correct authorities have the real power.
What about the John Edwards infidelity? Apparently all the media knew it, but it took the Enquirer to bust the story!
Nicely done. Half of the posters don’t get it.
But we know who they are and we can crossthread and ridicule them later ;-)
Those stories are less about his infidelity than about the nasty things that happened to those women afterwards.
If you don’t like them, don’t read them.
You avoid the irritation, and others are free to post as they see fit. We have moderators, and they control the posting content.
Eor want of a nail, a shoe was lost...
For want of a /s an inbox was dirtied. :)
Go put some ice on it.
Screw you AH!!!
Screw you AH!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.