Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: al baby

Why not aknowledge a terrorist attack? I don’t know much about TWA 800, I know that there are those who insist they saw something else, but I can’t see why the cover up. A terrorist attack and Clinton would be the war president and would guarantee his reelection. And how do they manage to still keep it secret, when we can’t keep classified info secret? And since Clinton is out and Obama in.....why not spring the story now, especially would have been helpful in derailing Hillary’s campaign.

I’m not trying to be combative, I was still in highschool when it happened and didn’t follow it much at all. I’m just wondering why the cover up? It doesn’t make sense to me.


47 posted on 01/08/2009 9:57:03 PM PST by mockingbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: mockingbyrd

ping


48 posted on 01/08/2009 9:59:31 PM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: mockingbyrd

And while we’re at it, why not acknowledge Arab involvement in OKC?

Why not acknowledge that Jose Padilla is John Doe #2?

‘Cause you’re banging an intern and you’ve got yours, screw everyone else.


52 posted on 01/08/2009 10:33:53 PM PST by Hessian (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: mockingbyrd
Why not aknowledge a terrorist attack?

Democrat (nor Republican) leadership cannot and will not deviate from their support of one world government.

Compare events such as clinton's bombing of Serbia in support of the invading muslim terrorist KLA to the force applied by the clintonista's against Americans during the clinton regime.

clinton and his ilk did their part to further the globalist agenda. The new world order needed a perceived as strong enemy. Their studied inaction, when it came to Muslim terrorists, provided the banksters with time to morph muslim terrorists into our Orwellian nightmare.

Democrats couldn't acknowlege muslim attacks on our sovereignty. That would only serve to strengthen our National identity. That's a bad thing from the political leaders viewpoint.

Conversely, identifying OKC bombers as right wing extremists or groups like the Branch Davidians in Waco as dangerous religious cults weakens our Sovereign identity. For the one worlders that's a good thing.

And how do they manage to still keep it secret

There are secrets and then there are important secrets. One thing that has to be remembered is most politicians, and democrats especially, are cowards.

Keeping secrets in those circles can not only make you a lot of cash, it can keep you alive.

And it would mean our secretely planned transformation could continue.

54 posted on 01/09/2009 2:23:49 AM PST by MurrietaMadman (...It's all just MHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: mockingbyrd

Clinton did not want anything to happen to “rock the boat” or his presidency. Remember his administration was run by polls. He could have had Bin Ladan but chose not to. Too controversial. He would have covered up 9\11 if he could have. Remember him bombing a building in Iraq? Got a janitor.


64 posted on 01/09/2009 5:03:18 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: mockingbyrd

Just curios what was the take on this you got from your high school teachers?


75 posted on 01/09/2009 6:51:56 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom Mr. Obama, are you aware that Sarah Palin took on her own party’s establishment in Alaska a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson