Skip to comments.
Obama Vows No Torture in War Against Terrorism
FoxNews.com ^
| Friday, January 09, 2009
Posted on 01/09/2009 11:36:48 AM PST by Joiseydude
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Joiseydude
IMO the Geneva Convention doesn’t apply to terrorists. And when terrorists behead Americans I believe that 10 terrorists should die. I am barbaric I suppose because I would choke them with pig intestines etc. Why people think they can reason with kooks is beyond my thinking. I would kill them in the worst way they could imagine & I would make sure they suffered & didn’t get their 72 virgins or whatever they believe. At this point I would take them alive & toss them into a pig sty of hungry pigs & let them eat them alive.
41
posted on
01/09/2009 12:09:56 PM PST
by
pandoraou812
(Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
To: Blue Turtle
Don’t worry, º ‘s mind changes as much as the weather.
Learning a real job is hard.
42
posted on
01/09/2009 12:10:20 PM PST
by
TribalPrincess2U
(Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
To: Joiseydude
"Gentlemen, please, you can't fight in here! This is the war room."
Dr. Strangelove
To: Joiseydude
"We will abide by the Geneva ConventionsThat's the problem isn't it , they don't cover "irregulars".
44
posted on
01/09/2009 12:15:11 PM PST
by
1066AD
To: Joiseydude
Maybe 0bama’ll define waterboarding as ‘definitely not torture’ because we use it in training some of our own forces.
45
posted on
01/09/2009 12:20:20 PM PST
by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: pandoraou812
I’d simply tell them that unless they talk, should they *ahem* die in prison, we will bury them with a “ham hat” on their heads. (TM Glenn Beck)
46
posted on
01/09/2009 12:20:32 PM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
To: stuartcr
47
posted on
01/09/2009 12:21:26 PM PST
by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: Joiseydude
48
posted on
01/09/2009 12:21:54 PM PST
by
IbJensen
(Help! Our government is killing us.)
To: Joiseydude
Wonder what Hussein and the rest of the US hating, PC crowd will say after the first nuke goes off in New York? After “It was Bush’s fault”, that is.
49
posted on
01/09/2009 12:23:17 PM PST
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: Joiseydude
The Fool-In-Chief has probably never actually read the Geneva Conventions, otherwise he would not have issued such a stupid statement... I expect that he will soon address the United Nations and publicly apologize for all of America's "war crimes".
America's enemies must be LOL at the naive rube who will soon occupy the Oval Office...
50
posted on
01/09/2009 12:25:28 PM PST
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: Joiseydude
So 0bama plans to follow GWB’s lead regarding the Geneva Convention. That’s good.
51
posted on
01/09/2009 12:25:37 PM PST
by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: Russ
It works, just ask McCain.
Remember, Obama constantly lies, so he will torture anyone who gets in his way. Just wait until a few deals he thinks he has negotiated go bad.
52
posted on
01/09/2009 12:27:07 PM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: Joiseydude
“Obama Vows No Torture in War Against Terrorism”
...smooth move ex-lax. Way to lose a war that we’re winning. Of course, that’s the goal isn’t it?
53
posted on
01/09/2009 12:28:21 PM PST
by
albie
To: The Electrician
Remember when reporters asked the Empty Suit what he would do if Russia made an aggressive move and he was President at the time? I believe he said he’d bring them before the U.N. Security Council and request a vote on sanctions. And then someone had to remind him that Russia has VETO power on the UNSC.
He’s an affirmative action idiot.
54
posted on
01/09/2009 12:31:49 PM PST
by
Right Cal Gal
(Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
To: Joiseydude
Hey Obama - put your money where your mouth is, make it a Constitutional amendment banning the use of torture. What’s the point of not having torture for just 4 years?
How convenient, the research and procedures on torture will simply sit on a bookshelf till the next time our government needs them.
55
posted on
01/09/2009 12:35:54 PM PST
by
jstassis
To: Joiseydude
His administration will be four years of torture for millions worldwide.
To: Blue Turtle
Brilliant....during war, its always good to tell your enemies there will be no torture.
That way they'll like us, and then they won't be our enemies anymore. It's all so simple. (/sarc)
57
posted on
01/09/2009 12:46:04 PM PST
by
Sopater
(I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
To: Joiseydude
Might want to rethink your position.
58
posted on
01/09/2009 12:54:48 PM PST
by
wolfcreek
(I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
To: Joiseydude
“So what does that leave, harsh langauge?”
Yes, a stern lecture and time-outs will make them talk.
To: Joiseydude
So he’s continuing the Bush policy?
There never WAS “torture”, dillhole.
60
posted on
01/09/2009 1:13:18 PM PST
by
ElectricStrawberry
(1/27th Infantry Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson