Skip to comments.Nut allergies -- a Yuppie invention
Posted on 01/10/2009 9:19:49 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
Your kid doesn't have an allergy to nuts. Your kid has a parent who needs to feel special. Your kid also spends recess running and screaming, "No! Stop! Don't rub my head with peanut butter!"
Yes, a tiny number of kids have severe peanut allergies that cause anaphylactic shock, and all their teachers should be warned, handed EpiPens and given a really expensive gift at Christmas. But unless you're a character on "Heroes," genes don't mutate fast enough to have caused an 18% increase in childhood food allergies between 1997 and 2007. And genes certainly don't cause 25% of parents to believe that their kids have food allergies, when 4% do. Yuppiedom does.
Parents may think they are doing their kids a favor by testing them and being hyper-vigilant about monitoring what they eat, but it's not cool to freak kids out. Only 20% of kids who get a positive allergy test result need treatment. And a 2003 study showed that kids who were told they were allergic to peanuts had more anxiety and felt more physically restricted than if they had diabetes. "It's anxiety-producing to imagine that having a snack in kindergarten could be deadly," Christakis said. Remember, this is a demographic so easily panicked that, equipped with only circles and dots, it invented an inoculation to cooties.
~snip some more~
So bring back nuts to schools. If parents need to panic about a food, at least go with seafood allergies. Those fish sticks are disgusting.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
No thank you. I’m allergic to Yuppie Nuts.
I didn't know they had them. :)
BBC ^ December 10, 2008
Posted on Sunday, December 21, 2008 1:27:20 PM by billorites
A peanut on the floor of a US school bus recently led to evacuation and decontamination for fear it might have affected the 10-year-old passengers.
Such extreme steps to reduce exposure to nuts are not isolated and are fuelling fear and anxiety, reports the British Medical Journal Online.
A UK allergy expert said a similar "epidemic" was present in Britain.
Professor Nicolas Christakis, a professor of medical sociology at Harvard Medical School, told the BMJ there was "a gross over-reaction to the magnitude of the threat" posed by food allergies, and particularly nut allergies.
In the US, serious allergic reactions to foods cause just 2,000 of more than 30 million hospitalisations a year and comparatively few deaths - 150 a year from all food allergies combined.
In the UK there are around 10 deaths each year from food allergies.
Professor Christakis said the issue was not whether nut allergies existed or whether they could occasionally be serious. Nor was the issue whether reasonable preventative steps should be made for the few children who had documented serious allergies, he argued.
"The issue is what accounts for the extreme responses to nut allergies."
He said the number of US schools declaring themselves to be entirely "nut free" - banning staples like peanut butter, homemade baked goods and any foods without detailed ingredient labels - was rising, despite clear evidence that such restrictions were unnecessary.
"School entrances have signs admonishing visitors to wash their hands before entry to avoid [nut] contamination."
He said these responses were extreme and had many of the hallmarks of mass psychogenic illness (MPI), previously known as epidemic hysteria.
Often seen occurring in small towns, schools and other institutions, outbreaks of MPI involve healthy people in a flow of anxiety, most often triggered by a fear of contamination.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
very true, but those that have nut and foold allergies can really get sick. As a matter of fact the 21% of frauds are who are causing the scoffing for the 4% that are truly allergic....
Peanuts are not nuts. They are legumes. The parents are the nuts.
this article would make sense if genes were solely responsible for allergy. but it is a little more complicated than that. hygiene, age of exposure, gut flora, antibiotic exposure, all probably play a role. allergies are increasing. but skin testing, and RAST testing are probably over sensitive.
“I didn’t know they had them. :)”
Yuppie Nuts are quite popular in certain areas of the country. I do believe Berkeley is where they’re produced, as well as all public education institutions. :^)
I think I see mine there on the upper left....the shriveled ones.
The assault on peanuts was just the beginning of politically correct food nazis.
Today they go after transfats, corn syrup, and everything else.
These are the same people who go after smokers, cologne/perfume users and anything that looks, smells or feel uncomfortable.
Or a 500% increase since the seventies when I was in elementary school.
I guess that's not done anymore.
I’m allergic to yuppies, yippies, hippies, guppies, and muppets. Especially elmo.
What a coincidence.
I believe I saw something like that on November 4.
Thank you for posting this. You’re quite right...Peanuts are related to “peas”.
I like fish sticks.
Although I DO agree about the mass hysteria about the peanuts (It's a peanut - hit the floor!), as a family with food allergies that nearly killed my child - allergy to wheat, misdiagnosed as ulcers, and therefore fed more wheat... I can truly feel the pain!!!!
I think we as a society are becoming more aware of the allergens and are diagnosing them. As a child I was told I just had a nervous stomach because I didn't like school - "now drink your milk or you can't go to recess"...to finding out as an adult my severe stomach pain was caused because of milk allergy/lactose intolerance.
People who have not been there should not judge - severe allergies are real!
You said your best one is the size of a pea, but the other one is a little bitty thing?
I am a little confused? I thought California liberals liked ‘nuts’. Wasn’t that what Prop 8 was all about?
What about Barack Omuppet?
Are you allergic to him?
I have sensitivity to various things, but none of them are life-threatening. It's more of a quality of life thing: if I drink this, I get a headache or a runny nose. If I eat that, I'll have some digestive issues. And it's not absolute: I can tolerate small to moderate amounts, but too much will overload my system. The threshold varies according to how I'm doing overall.
I think the allergies have always been there, and the prevalence hasn't changed much. What has changed is the medical profession's ability to recognize the potential and test for it. Then predictably, some people overreact.
No no no.....look like a couple of half pecans, I guess.....just a joke..
I love those things. However, for three million Americans, the allergy is a pretty serious issue. Granted, that’s one percent of the population.
I do too. I wonder what they’re made of?
Mrs. R2 will NOT eat any fish. Not fried, nor broiled, nor baked, nor nothing. No shrimp, no oysters, no clam chowder...
If it has anything to do with fish - forget it. Ain’t gonna eat it.
But she will eat fish sticks.
Which brings me back to the question.... I wonder what they’re made of.
You mean sea kitten sticks?
Just wait until they discover 18% of the population is allergic to second hand medical marijuana smoke, leaves and roaches. Heads will explode.
Step 1. Catch fish.
Step 2. Remove sticks.
Step 3. Cook and eat.
Oh yeah. I forgot.
Next thing you know those will be banned too due to fish allergies or PETA.
Aren't they calling fish, sea kittens these days. Then it would be cat fish sticks - LOL...now I'm getting hungry...time for lunch!
I think I'll have a big peanut butter sandwich on some gluten free bread with a tall glass of lactose free milk! (Hey - at least I am not allergic to peanuts!)
I agree with this article on several levels. First of all, telling kids that they are allergic to something only exaggerates the reactions. Second allergy testing is not exactly fool proof, some sensitive people react to their own histamine, rendering the tests useless. For instance, I can write my name on the inside of my arm with my finger nail and raise a red welt.
Then there’s this anecdotal story:
When my kid’s were young, and I was teaching Bible school, I greeted a young mother at the door, as she dropped off her daughter, and laughingly said to her, “Oh, I see that you’ve been swimming.” When she came back to pick up her daughter, the woman asked how I knew that she had been swimming. I said because you have the rash around your eyes from the latex goggles. She was astonished because she worked for the local allergy specialist who had been treating the swimmers and yet he could not identify her allergy with all his testing. He told her that she was allergic to nail polish and must have been rubbing her eyes.
Some things it’s best not to wonder about:’) I like fried fish sticks with mac and cheese.
Nuts! Hot nuts!
Anybody here wanna buy my nuts?
Selling nuts, hot nuts
I’ve got nuts for sale
Now you see that man all dressed in black
His nuts is so hot he keep ‘em in a sack
He’s got nuts, hot nuts,
You buy ‘em from the peanut man
Cat fish sticks...I like that lol
The FR link in post # 5 is off its nut.
The BBC link is ok but click here to see the FR thread:
That's the first time I heard that one!
And yes, I too am severely allegic to him! Every time I am exposed to him my skin starts to crawl, my brain feels like it is going to explode and I get the urge to vomit!
Where did you go to school?! Where I went to school (GA, in the 1960's,) if a kid forgot his lunch, the S.O.P. was... forcing him to sit there and watch the other kids eat their lunches.
((Those nuns were really mean!))
It explains it right here!
I had to right click that image just to know what the heck it was!
Just so you know. I always buy the extra crunchy Jif. Nothing less will do!
Say what you want about nut allergies being a yuppie problem.
Medicine has come a long way in the science of allergy research, discovering common chemical compounds, natural and man made that do build up toxicity's in some people for reasons unknown.
But I do think people over react to everything that might harm a child. Those kind of nuts we should all avoid.
They’re real all right, and from my own experiences, including anaphylactic shock, I wouldn’t wish them on anyone
No... I disagree.
SPAM is made of Soylent Green.
I ate some Spam once. I am convinced of it.
I grew up in schools where many kids stored their PB&J sandwiches in their desks in the classrooms then ate them sitting together in the cafeteria. I have flown on about 1,500 airline flights when the majority of flights they handed out nuts for snacks to everybody and those were usually peanuts. I have NEVER seen anyone go into any kind of nut-related alergic reaction in school or on airplanes.
I like SPAM too. Never heard of a spam allergy! I think that is a “safe” food! Great fried with a little butter on a sandwich...can you tell its lunchtime!
Actually there is a problem here. Allergies are not a question of “no exposure or you are going to die”, except in extreme cases. A great many people have allergies so mild they aren’t even aware of them.
An excellent, yet odd case is celery. Celery is a very potent and odoriferous herb, that to most animals is about as strong as onion and garlic. But people, through some odd species quirk, can’t smell most of its odor.
Many people have a mild allergy to celery, getting just a mild throat irritation that quickly passes. However, it was discovered that some long distance runners, who after becoming very pumped up, would chomp down on a stick of celery and pass out with anaphylactic shock. The very simple solution was “don’t do that.”
But allergies can also change over time. If you have a mild allergy to some food, and eat a horse dose of it, or smaller amounts for a long time, it may increase your sensitivity to them. Conversely, if you have a more severe reaction to them, abstaining for a long time might reduce the allergic response somewhat.
A good example of this is severe “hay fever”, which is most likely due to a particular kind of tree pollen for a particular person. The very best treatment is to go somewhere without that pollen for a few weeks. But that is also mitigated because tree pollen cycles don’t usually last very long, so would be much diminished by the time you returned, anyway.
Importantly, allergies used to be defined by the allergen, but in truth they should be defined also by the individual response. Even though allergies are a reaction to particular organic proteins, people are able to have an allergic response to inorganic substances as well. So while technically they aren’t “allergic” to something, chlorine for example, their body still has an allergic response.
A recent study in Finland reported that the genetic problem with wheat extends to at least 3.5% of the population in that country who have the genes for it (and there are now 11 different genes that can cause it). However, the problem with wheat usually only affects about 1.2% of infants and children.
Fortunately it's not really an allergy. Instead, our T-cells are already pre-programmed by the genome to treat wheat as a deadly poison. It's not, of course, but the genome doesn't know that. Lactose intolerance isn't an allergy either ~ it's just normal. Adults up until about 10,000 years ago had a full set of genes that enabled folks to handle milk up until they were 6 years old or so, and then they shut down lactase production. Normal adults can't handle milk, but mutants can (how's that for spin).
In the US, about 5% of whites, 25% of African Americans and virtually 100% of Asian Americans cannot digest lactose without the aid of lactase pills.With 7% of all Americans having some degree of trouble with milk, and another 3.5% having some degree of trouble with wheat, you have a nice chunk of the market (10.5%) that will NOT BUY products containing milk or wheat, or both.
Those of you with either problem know how terribly many things like that are sold in modern grocerystores. Even sodapop has wheat additives (called "modified food starch") ~ I'm down to one brand in one flavor because of that.
I'm starting a campaign to force "truth in labeling" on cornbread so that it only has corn in it, and Rice Krispies have only rice! And what's this problem with so many cooks who ruin perfectly good chili by putting in flour when there's so much cornstarch available.
BTW, there's another 40%+ of the population who have a fish allergy to one degree or the other. A few of them really get sick. Most don't.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.