Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf; SunkenCiv; blam; NormsRevenge; All

“The largest quake ever recorded, a 9.5, happened there in 1960.”

Actually, I think the great New Madrid earthquake series in 1811-1812 may have been greater, especially if viewed cumulatively. At least three were extremely powerful. Also, there was an extremely strong earthquake in Assam, I think in the 1950’s, which I seem to recall increased the height of Mt. Everest by 20 feet? The great Lisbon earthquake several centuries ago was no slouch either.


14 posted on 01/20/2009 9:35:06 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin
"Actually, I think the great New Madrid earthquake series in 1811-1812 may have been greater, especially if viewed cumulatively."

That's my present understanding too.

15 posted on 01/21/2009 4:40:05 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

9.5 is enormously bad. Perhaps they’re going with quakes for which there are actual seismograph readings available. What you said about Everest rings a bell, not sure how long ago that was. The New Madrid quake (the biggest one) rerouted the Mississippi by a few miles, and that takes some doing.


16 posted on 01/21/2009 5:00:23 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson