Posted on 01/26/2009 4:41:59 AM PST by Loud Mime
"Calling for a "new era of responsibility" in his inaugural address, President Barack Obama reminded us that there are no limits to "what free men and women can achieve."
"But there's a threshold problem for our new president. Americans don't feel free to reach inside themselves and make a difference. The growth of litigation and regulation has injected a paralyzing uncertainty into everyday choices."
"Here we stand, facing the worst economy since the Great Depression, and Americans no longer feel free to do anything about it. We have lost the idea, at every level of social life, that people can grab hold of a problem and fix it. Defensiveness has swept across the country like a cold wave. We have become a culture of rule followers, trained to frame every solution in terms of existing law or possible legal risk. The person of responsibility is replaced by the person of caution. When in doubt, don't.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
The only sure-thing about President Obama’s rule is that litigation will grow.
You might be interested in this collection of quotes about juries and their power.
http://www.levellers.org/jrp/orig/jrp.jurquotes.htm
I also suggest reading about the 1895 Sparf VS US trial. It led to a supreme court decision that jurors need not be told of their rights. It led to the dumbing down of jurors and the growth of court and attorney power.
When I was young (back in the mid-70’s) it was not unusual for 6-8 of us young guys to walk through the neighborhood with our BB guns and pellet guns and go over to the abandoned gravel plant at 56th & Allisonville and shoot things. Cans, birds, bottles, whatever. When done we’d walk back through the neighborhood to our homes, and play some football or basketball or whatever.
Can you imagine kids trying to do this today? You’d have the SWAT team called out, the kids would be taken to juvenile detention, branded as terrorists and waived to adult court.
All thanks to lawyers and the government.
Remember the line from “Henry VI” by Shakespeare: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” A tad drastic, perhaps, given that we could use some of them for busboys and busgirls and manual laborers and such; you know, for doing “the jobs Americans won’t do.”
There are some good lawyers out there, for sure, but they are greatly outnumbered by the self-serving egotists who comprise the bulk of the legal profession.
The laws no longer protect us from the government.
The laws now protect those in government from us.
America is a tyranny of lawyers.
The law is what an attorney can convince a judge
Shredded, right. Banned from official jobs, nah. Think elaborate shadow gov.
As with everything since 'the beginning' the liberal brain perverts everything. This current bunch of elected now totally in charge were indoctrinated using the techniques of the first rebellion... as per Saul Alinsky's instruction manual 'Rules for Radicals'.
"Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer."
http://www.tysknews.com/Articles/dnc_corruption.htm
You are right about the dumbing down of jurors. I deal with litigation on a daily basis in my job, and the one constatnt is that jurors want only to be entertained while sitting in the box; the facts and the law are distractions to them.
Skunks and coons terrorize my suburban neighborhood.There are no dogs on patrol. People let their cats run free and leave food out..... the skunks and coons eat it.
Our current state of affairs is IMO a direct consequence of the misguided belief that we can legislate and regulate our way to some sort of social paradise. Utter and total folly, but a driving force in public affairs since at least the 60’s.
“When I was young (back in the mid-70’s) it was not unusual for 6-8 of us young guys to walk through the neighborhood with our BB guns and pellet guns and go over to the abandoned gravel plant at 56th & Allisonville and shoot things. Cans, birds, bottles, whatever. When done we’d walk back through the neighborhood to our homes, and play some football or basketball or whatever.”
When I was young (in the early to mid-1960s) we would walk to the bean fields and canyons near our homes openly carrying our .22s. This was in Southern California, in a Los Angeles suburb. My, how times have changed.
“The laws no longer protect us from the government.
The laws now protect those in government from us.”
DING! DING! DING! We have a winner!
“The only sure-thing about President Obama’s rule is that litigation will grow.”
********************
Yes, and most of the litigation occurs in urban areas- the blue cities, where blue jurors can’t wait to use damage awards to redistribute the wealth.
If the jurors in the John Couey trial had been given a clue about their rights, Couey would have been executed within months at the most.
Jurors have every right to question and cross examine. Jurors have every right to decide what is and isn’t admissable in court.
If jurors are informed, we may not always get the outcome we like but I think we would all feel a lot more at ease with our courts.
Legislators at all levels pass “laws” they never read, year after year. No one judge or executive, much less constituent can ever master even a summary understanding of it all. It is a law bubble, and will collapse like the others at some point, it is inevitable. Part of the grand plan. We have already passed the point of any rational “return to basic principals” when it comes to the legal system, IMHO.
I have thought this way since 2nd year law school, 35 years ago.
Re: Your post #9.
So very, very true.
“Our current state of affairs is IMO a direct consequence of the misguided belief that we can legislate and regulate our way to some sort of social paradise. Utter and total folly, but a driving force in public affairs since at least the 60’s.”
Exactly. I was born in 1951, so I was an eye witness to the collapse of America as the land of the free and the home of the brave. While we still have a few brave souls in the US, we are no longer a free people. The left has seen to that, but the real fault rests with those who allowed it to happen.
I’ve got more on my FR homepage.
I’m scheduled for jury duty in two weeks....here in California. Thanks for the information on your FR page!
If you are a lawyer, you might want to join a lawyer anti-lawyer organization so that you can have some documentary proof that you were ‘against the system’.
There is a lot of money to be made, stripping the assets of a declining, elderly, feeble in history and political philosophy people.
We have a society that is built, run and changed by an elite of lawyers, socialists, financiers and marketeer.
It, the society, is a anti democratic product, and beyond the desires or understanding of a median citizen. Therefor it isn’t their society. Therefor it ought not be supported, and in many ways it isn’t.
This constant and further gulf, or spreading, between the masses and the elites is classic stage for revolt.
ought-six wrote: “Exactly. I was born in 1951, so I was an eye witness to the collapse of America as the land of the free and the home of the brave. While we still have a few brave souls in the US, we are no longer a free people. The left has seen to that, but the real fault rests with those who allowed it to happen.”
..... I do believe that there is a path back. The Left has shown us the way. Organization at the grass roots level. Establishment of a nationwide network of inter-related and coordinated “social activism” interest groups, rigorous party discipline, headline grabbing guerilla theater, ceaseless attack and ridicule of the Left and its policies in Alinsky-like fashion. It worked for them and it will work for us. Once you undermine the Left at the grass roots level, their entire edifice will inevitably collapse like a house of cards in slow motion.
“Once you undermine the Left at the grass roots level, their entire edifice will inevitably collapse like a house of cards in slow motion.”
Your proposal is a sound one. The only draw back is that we work and our time is very much spoken for, so we don’t have the luxury of free hours that the left have. But, we can do it if we are truly committed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.