Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Get $78 From Bank of America [overdraft class action lawsuit]
Smart Money ^ | 2009-01-26 | Kelli B. Grant

Posted on 01/26/2009 4:30:36 PM PST by rabscuttle385

If you were hit with an overdraft fee from Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) (or one of the banks it acquired) between 2000 and 2007, you may be in for a little cash.

Bank of America recently settled a class-action lawsuit that alleged it (and by extension, Fleet Bank, LaSalle Bank and U.S. Trust Company, which it acquired during that period) changed the posting order of transactions and embarked on other activities in order to increase the revenue it received from non-sufficient funds fees, overdraft fees and similar charges. The lawsuit, which was settled for $35 million, also alleged that the bank failed to warn customers that certain transactions were triggering fees. Even though Bank of America denies any wrongdoing, it is agreeing to pay up to $78 per account holder.

(Excerpt) Read more at smartmoney.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: California
KEYWORDS: bankofamerica; classaction; litigation; overdraft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2009 4:30:36 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; bamahead; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; ...
*Ping!*
2 posted on 01/26/2009 4:31:10 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

So great, now idiots who bounce checks are getting free money.


3 posted on 01/26/2009 4:32:28 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

As an idealistic law school student, I actually thought that a tort-based class action suit did some good for the public at large.

Indeed, at one time that was the case.

Today, the representing attorneys make millions while members of the class get a check for $3.00 and there is little to no change in the practices that made up the underpinnings of the suit itself.

Makes me sick.


4 posted on 01/26/2009 4:35:25 PM PST by Be_Politically_Erect (Don't be a Mawworm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

They have paid this lawsuit before (and will usually refund you the fees if you complain enough, and don’t let it become a habit), BUT will they dis-continue the practice?


5 posted on 01/26/2009 4:35:44 PM PST by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So great, now idiots who bounce checks are getting free money.

You obviously don't realize the sorts of dirty tricks that the big banks play with their customers.

Post transactions in certain ways to maximize overdrafts, drop signature-based debit card purchases off the account between authorization and final posting, games with funds availability rules, etc. For example, back in the day (2005) when I was a Bank of America customer, I put cash into my checking account and then moved it into my savings account online when I got home. And yes, the transactions posted in such a convoluted way that I got slapped with overdraft fees and low balance fees (most of which I got waived).

The fact of the matter is that consumer banking regulations are excessively complicated and banks are essentially fleecing households of money.

6 posted on 01/26/2009 4:38:23 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So great, now idiots who bounce checks are getting free money.

Yes and no... BofA was sited for doing some rather nasty things... For instance, if you made a cash deposit to cover checks, they would process the checks BEFORE crediting your account with the deposit, when they occurred on the same day. Another thing they would do would be manipulate the order of transactions, in order to maximize the insufficient funds fees.

I once had a problem where they tried to charge me a late fee on a credit card payment, but I had proof that the check had been processed BEFORE the due date. I've since gone to only making my payments with BofA using electronic transfers.

Mark

7 posted on 01/26/2009 4:39:39 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

You are right, if you bitch and moan they will reverse the charges.


8 posted on 01/26/2009 4:40:59 PM PST by Boiling Pots (The USA has become one huge pyramid scheme. Thanks George, John, Nancy and Harry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

No, it is a return of fees charged by BoA due to their practices designed to generate fees.

They are known to hold deposits and charge accounts so that they can maximize NSF fees.

Then instead of one large check bouncing, they’ll work it to make several checks bounce.

It isn’t “free” money, it is simply a return of some of the fees wrongly charged.


9 posted on 01/26/2009 4:41:06 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Not quite... Start with an account with a $100 balance. Deposit $1000 in your BOA account this morning; do it in cash, at a teller. Your balance shows $1100, and that’s what the receipt from the teller will show.

Now that same day, 5 hours later, use your debit card to buy something for $900.

BOA will, when processing the transactions will consider the purchase as “earlier” than your deposit, so that you had only $100 when you purchased, meaning they did an “overdraft protection” for the other $800 you didn’t have.

Essentially they would consider all withdrawals happening first thing in the morning REGARDLESS of when they happened, and all deposits as happening at the end of business, regardless of when they actually happened.


10 posted on 01/26/2009 4:42:18 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Be_Politically_Erect

I don’t know if they are still in business but there was a California couple that lived for the class action suit.

They hit mortgage and credit card companies hard. Fleet lost and laid of thousands. Then I got a check fo 39 cents. I kid you not.

I am glad to see BoA whacked with this, however.


11 posted on 01/26/2009 4:43:33 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Post all the debits first,

Then apply the customer's deposit.

Been there and done that. Deposit or transfer cash funds in the morning...pay bills online in the afternoon...see overdraft fees of $120.00 the next day. Yeah...they can play games even with the simplest of transactions.

12 posted on 01/26/2009 4:43:54 PM PST by EBH ( Directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; MarkL

The formula is quite simple:

Never write checks that total an amount more than the amount of cash that you have in your checking account.

Or you can run your finances by writing hot checks (stealing).


13 posted on 01/26/2009 4:44:50 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

No, this really is a scam. If they put your charges in order, they would probably get one overdraft fee for the item that went over the limit. And that would be fair.

But BofA likes to pay off the big charge first, leaving a whole bunch of small items, each with its own overdraft fee.


14 posted on 01/26/2009 4:44:55 PM PST by SmithL (The Golden State demands all of your gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Do you need a reading lesson or did you not bother to read the posts?


15 posted on 01/26/2009 4:47:07 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
BOA will, when processing the transactions will consider the purchase as “earlier” than your deposit, so that you had only $100 when you purchased, meaning they did an “overdraft protection” for the other $800 you didn’t have.

That is why there is a sign posted at the teller window and driver thru that reads "Money deposited after 3:00 will not be posted to your account until the next business day.

Again, simple rule, Do not spend more money than you actually have in your account.

16 posted on 01/26/2009 4:48:50 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Several years ago, I had $2500 in a BOA account with a $3k deposit that should have been added in first thing friday morning, giving me a balance of $5.5k, MORE THAN ENOUGH to cover $3800 worth of checks that were clearing on the same day.

HOWEVER

BOA took the checks out FIRST (even though the deposit had been transmitted thursday evening and was sitting there waiting)..they took out the clearing checks in order from highest to smallest (4 small bounced checks produce more revenue than one big one), THEN gave me the deposit..

I threw a tantrum like a 2 year old, in a BOA branch..in order for me to quiet down in front of customers, they refunded the check fees, admitting “an administrative error”. Once they gave me the funds back, I immediately closed the account and moved to wachovia..NEVER had that problem there..

those were the last checks I ever (non)bounced..


17 posted on 01/26/2009 4:48:58 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (A democrat will break your leg, then hand you a crutch and take credit for your being able to walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; MarkL; SmithL
Never write checks that total an amount more than the amount of cash that you have in your checking account.

Look at my previous post.

I put cash into my checking account.

I then went home and transferred funds into my savings account from my checking account.

Bank of America's computer systems moved money back and forth between my checking and savings accounts in highly contorted ways (my savings was set up for overdraft to checking at the time) that ended with an overdraft fee AND a savings account low balance maintenance fee.

Try explaining how I got slapped with fees anyways, including a low balance fee on my savings account that I discovered too late to contest.

18 posted on 01/26/2009 4:49:50 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

$78 bookmark


19 posted on 01/26/2009 4:49:57 PM PST by musicman (Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Yes, I understand BoA’s procedures and will not defend BoA.

However, there is no reason why a person should spend more money than they actually have.


20 posted on 01/26/2009 4:50:40 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

I do the ATM and they tell me what funds are available.


21 posted on 01/26/2009 4:51:22 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

capital one got nailed for reporting customer balances on credit cards as their credit limit..i.e. you put $100 on your card this month, they’d report your limit as $100..

this effectively increased your debt ratio and the credit score was lowered since you were “max’d out” on the card..

they lost the suit and now report normally..


22 posted on 01/26/2009 4:55:02 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (A democrat will break your leg, then hand you a crutch and take credit for your being able to walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
So great, now idiots who bounce checks are getting free money.

No, it's not free money.

I already paid them the multiple 39.00 overdraft fee because they posted the largest item first and bounced all the other ones that should have cleared.

If I spent 8.00 for lunch and $4.00 on the way home for milk on my debit card and then the next day I screwed up and forgot the check was 500.00 instead of 450.00 and it bounces that night with the other two debit charges, I get banged for all three even though I spent the money hours, sometimes days earlier.

I would be happy to pay the one fee, for the over drafted check, since it was my mistake, but that's not the way it works

23 posted on 01/26/2009 4:55:21 PM PST by Popman (Luca Brasi sleeps with da sea kittens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; Eagle Eye
However, there is no reason why a person should spend more money than they actually have.

The problem is that you "have" the money but you "don't"...and BofA changes the status of its money and orders transactions to maximize its fee income.

None of the other big banks did this to the level that BofA did.

24 posted on 01/26/2009 4:55:22 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

bump


25 posted on 01/26/2009 5:00:48 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The formula is quite simple:

Never write checks that total an amount more than the amount of cash that you have in your checking account.

Or you can run your finances by writing hot checks (stealing).

Just make sure that you've always got your deposit slips to prove when you actually made the deposits. I've been hit with NSF fees when I never actually ran low on money in my account. It wasn't with BofA, but I had to go back and show my bank that I had made a cash deposit more than 3 days before the date that the checks were processed.

Mark

26 posted on 01/26/2009 5:02:02 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
You know, your the kind of knuckleheaded numbskull that gives numbskulls a bad name.
27 posted on 01/26/2009 5:02:44 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

yeah, a month or so ago I bought a pack of cigarettes for $4.50, but it cost me $144.50!


28 posted on 01/26/2009 5:08:07 PM PST by When do we get liberated? ((Ok, Im the official Pit Bull Defender/If you can't stand behind our troops, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I am half tempted to walk into my B of A branch office and proclaim my disgust with their coporate practices and intention of moving my account to Wells Fargo.

A.P. Gianinni would fire the lot of them.

29 posted on 01/26/2009 5:09:13 PM PST by muleskinner ("You know the Germans always make good stuff')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Not necessarily, as a previous post pointed out, you deposit $1,000 in the morning, your deposit slip shows you have a thousand, then in the afternoon use your bankcard for a $900 purchase and they count the debit before making a final post of the deposit thus charging you overdraft fees.

I don’t even own checks. I strictly use bank cards. At least if I get an over draft now, it isn’t more than one purchase because the bank card will decline after that.

I have had this happen and in that amount too. One of the things that makes me mad about banks is they hit you with big fees and act like they are punishing you for being naughty somehow, but that fact is if no one had any overdraft or NSF fees for about a week, they would all go belly up.


30 posted on 01/26/2009 5:13:23 PM PST by auntyfemenist (If only FDR could come on TV again to encourage us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: auntyfemenist

http://www.federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm


31 posted on 01/26/2009 5:15:34 PM PST by Black Birch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

My daughter overdrew because she thought the ATM card was also a MasterCard account. The fees for overdrawing $35.00 in three transactions came to $250.00. I bitched and moaned and they dropped the fees.

ATM cards as debit cards are dangerous. They can be used without a PIN number and your account could be cleaned out. I request an ATM only, no debit.


32 posted on 01/26/2009 5:30:43 PM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I guess you never had a mortgage.


33 posted on 01/26/2009 5:33:33 PM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Many years ago, my local home-owned (by a local family) bank was sold to a larger bank in a medium-sized city about 80 miles away from our small town. The owning family denied any and all rumors of the sale up to the week they traded their controlling interest in the local bank for a block of stock in the medium-city bank, which turned around and sold to Boatmen’s in St. Louis two weeks later, which sold to BofA some time after that. The local bank had been kiting deposits for three days or so for years, so we were kind of used to it, not knowing any better. IOW, if you had $100 in your account, and deposited a check for $500, and wrote a check on that account for $300 TWO DAYS later, you got hit with a fee (they were waiting for the check to clear, even if it was on their own bank). Ah, the good old days.
34 posted on 01/26/2009 5:33:44 PM PST by Southbound ("A liar in public is worse than a full-paid-up Communist and I don't care who he is" - HST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
However, there is no reason why a person should spend more money than they actually have.

Then you failed to understand the cited examples.

35 posted on 01/26/2009 5:35:21 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Worked for Wells Fargo for four years going through college. When you have your first overdraft and you try to get it overturned, they will snicker like a guard at Dachau. Also, they will tell you that you are a “new account” which means you will be subjected to holds on large checks. IMHO, when it comes to checking and savings on a consumer level, small banks treat you way better. WAMU got a lot of business from WF because they simply didn’t crucify you for over-drafts and fees.


36 posted on 01/26/2009 5:35:44 PM PST by Historix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Already did that and moved to another bank. Been w BoA for 10 years have the last two were very frustrating.

Screw them and anyone that works for them.


37 posted on 01/26/2009 5:39:48 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Southbound

Yes, the primary checking account I now use has been in existence for more than 25 years and that same account has been at five of six different bank names which at this time is at Bank of America.

The original bank was a neighborhood bank and the president of that bank lived three doors down from us when I was a kid and when I opened that account.

When the bib boys took over that bank, I knew that I no longer had a connection with the officers of my bank.

I bounced one check when I was 18 0r 19 and have never bounced a check since.


38 posted on 01/26/2009 5:46:09 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
That is why there is a sign posted at the teller window and driver thru that reads "Money deposited after 3:00 will not be posted to your account until the next business day.

And that is why they LOST this class action lawsuit. It turns out that money deposited BEFORE 3:00 PM will not be posted until the next business day, either. At least in terms of timing your payments and deposits.

False advertising, you know...

39 posted on 01/26/2009 5:47:49 PM PST by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

No, I did not fail to understand the cited examples and did not condone the actions of BoA. However, I have for a long time understood how they operate and would never put myself in a situation where I wrote a check that I was not 100% sure would be covered.


40 posted on 01/26/2009 5:48:57 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Good move on your part. Bank of America is a pretty vile place to do business. They’ve built just an endless stream of tacky little fees into their services. Much better to go with regional banks, IMHO. I never deal with the nonsense with them, it seems.


41 posted on 01/26/2009 5:53:27 PM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
And that is why they LOST this class action lawsuit...

If that is the case, nail them. However, it does not excuse the practice of living paycheck to paycheck and having your paycheck chase your mortgage payment in your bank account.

Spend less money then you actually earn and these problems are less likely to occur.

By following that rule, you will build up a cushion in your checking account and may even start to build savings.

And yes, I have had some very lean years in my life where I worked 80 hours a week and still eat rice & beans, peanut butter or Ramen noodles every night.

42 posted on 01/26/2009 5:55:14 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

BOA rearranges deposits and debits so that it doesn’t matter if you have the money to cover the checks/debits. They sometimes hold deposits to allow NSF charges that shouldn’t be there.


43 posted on 01/26/2009 6:01:58 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz; PugetSoundSoldier; Eagle Eye
By following that rule, you will build up a cushion in your checking account and may even start to build savings.

Before or after inflation?

44 posted on 01/26/2009 6:10:38 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Your right about the concept...very wrong about the practice....read post #10....

This is what BoA is doing right now....they are thieves and liars hiding behind a corporate shield and psuedo-self righteousness....

45 posted on 01/26/2009 6:14:04 PM PST by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nevergore; trumandogz

BoA isn’t the only one smacking of self righteousness on this thread!


46 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:44 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
He's obviously in love with bankers and their shady practices.
47 posted on 01/26/2009 6:17:46 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Before, during and after inflation.

You simple spend less money than you earn.

And yes, you may have to cut back on your spending.


48 posted on 01/26/2009 6:21:59 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I think the last thing we need on this thread is someone lecturing us on not spending more than we make...especially since that is not the topic nor the problem with BoA!


49 posted on 01/26/2009 6:25:12 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

There’s a difference between income vs spending and cash flow but you just don’t seem to get it no matter who or how we tell you.


50 posted on 01/26/2009 6:27:13 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Libs- If you don't have to play the rules then neither do we...THINK ABOUT IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson