Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg
Obamacrimes.com ^ | January 26, 2009 | Philip Berg

Posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:23 PM PST by Calpernia

Advisory from Philip J. Berg, Esquire:

Re: Obama - "not" natural born - "not" qualified to be President

Attached is Press Release detailing:

U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg, case still alive in 3rd Circuit; GLOBE Magazine of 2/2/09 highlights Obama not being "qualified;" and Berg states he has 3 open cases and will continue to prove Obama ineligible.

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________ Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225 Response to Hollister Complaint due 1/26/09 by Soetoro/Obama and Biden

Call (610) 662-3005 to schedule interviews or Fax to (610) 834-7659 or E-mail to philjberg@gmail.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: berg; bho2009; bhoscotus; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; ineligible; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-294 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2009 6:11:24 PM PST by Calpernia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; pissant; LucyT; Iowan; getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL; Kevmo; Fred Nerks; bvw; ...

Ping


2 posted on 01/26/2009 6:12:31 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
" Case filed under seal, cannot be discussed."

Must be a national security threat to have this seal placed on the case.( sarc. off)

3 posted on 01/26/2009 6:14:00 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Didn’t 0 visit these folks last week?

Gee, I wonder what he said!


4 posted on 01/26/2009 6:14:03 PM PST by siamesecats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks, Calpernia

Ping.


5 posted on 01/26/2009 6:15:37 PM PST by Iowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: siamesecats; Beckwith; LucyT; Fred Nerks
Gee, I wonder what he said!>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

" I already have Acorn Offices in each of your neighborhoods, and believe me, I know where you live!"

6 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:08 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

The sealed case. I’m kinda curious if Berg does have a document in there that has proved Pres_ent is not qualified for his position.


7 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:49 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Is anyone really surprised here? The more they do to refuse to hear this case, the more we know it should be heard. No tinfoil required.


8 posted on 01/26/2009 6:16:53 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siamesecats
Gee, I wonder what he said!

Might have been what he did not say.

9 posted on 01/26/2009 6:17:06 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
U.S. Supreme Court denies Injunction request by Berg

Thanks Calpernia.

Ping.

10 posted on 01/26/2009 6:18:56 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Can Berg go to talk radio, show it to Rush, Sean, Mark, Ann and start getting it out that way? There is an end run around the press and we all know it. Why is it not being done?

let him publish his stuff, I am sure all the desperate papers will take a full page ad from him no matter the content anymore. the internet? There has to be a way to go public with this evidence. He has exhausted his legal options, bring it to the court of public opinion.....


11 posted on 01/26/2009 6:19:50 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Actually, I am.


12 posted on 01/26/2009 6:19:53 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Big Ears must still be pissed at what Justice Roberts made him do last week. Don’t forget the picture of Clarence Thomas dozing off while Zero was doing his coronation speech.


13 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:10 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

His cases (accept the sealed one) are published. The MSM has ignored most of this.


14 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:56 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; FreeManN

Thanks for the update on Berg


15 posted on 01/26/2009 6:20:58 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Not until he has given the system time to work...If they don’t the Court of Public Opinion WILL decide.


16 posted on 01/26/2009 6:23:34 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Did Thomas really snooze? I missed that.


17 posted on 01/26/2009 6:24:13 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Does he have actual physical irrefutable proof of his ineligibility? Can that be posted? Ads taken in newspapers showing THE proof? Going on talk radio and showing the proof to the hosts to be verified by them? If so, when? This needs to get out if it is true, and if the courts say no, we need to get it out to the people. Only about 20 percent of this country (the far left libs) would not care about a unconstitutional candidate taking office when the proof is right there.


18 posted on 01/26/2009 6:25:55 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

01/26/09: PRESS RELEASE - New Issue of GLOBE Magazine [Feb. 2nd] Highlights
Philip J. Berg, Esq. Efforts to Expose Obama not being “qualified” to be President.
Also, Berg states U.S. Supreme Court denied Injunction request but Berg has three [3] cases still open and Berg states he will prove Obama “ineligible” to be President

(Contact information and PDF at end)

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/26/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama announced today that the new issue of GLOBE Magazine [2/2/09 issue] highlights his efforts to expose Obama not being “constitutionally qualified” and therefore, Obama should be removed from office.

Berg also stated that the U.S. Supreme Court denied his request for an Injunction from the Conference that was held on January 16, 2009. However, the case that was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court, Berg vs. Obama is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals where Berg just filed a Brief on 1/20/09. Berg said I had bypassed the Third Circuit hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear our case on an expedited basis because of the significance of the case.

The two [2] other cases are in Federal Court and I will advise you shortly about the status of each.

Berg said, “This is the 5th time GLOBE Magazine has highlighted the question of Obama’s lack of ‘constitutional qualifications’ to be President. The new story about Obama is the center spread and two [2] other pages. More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the constitutional ‘qualifications’ and that this is the biggest ‘Hoax’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years.”

Berg concluded, “I am proceeding for the 305 + million people in ‘our’ U.S.A., for ‘our’ forefathers and for the thousands and thousands that have died defending our Constitution with the legal fight to prove that Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be President.”

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254
Response to Hollister Complaint due 1/26/09 by Soetoro/Obama and Biden

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
Cell (610) 662-3005

philjberg@obamacrimes.com


19 posted on 01/26/2009 6:27:16 PM PST by luv2ndamend (May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. — Samue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

The courts have had their chance. They seem to be in the cover up business as well if they are sealing things like this and they are not up for discussion.


20 posted on 01/26/2009 6:27:34 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

21 posted on 01/26/2009 6:28:14 PM PST by Outland (So when do we stop typing and start doing something?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

In spite of everything he still won’t show his original birth certificate to put the rumors down. Just the arrogance alone is troubling.


22 posted on 01/26/2009 6:29:54 PM PST by deannadurbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; All
Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Freepers, We the People have not yet begun to Fight!

We will bury bo (figuratively) under an AVALANCHE of LAWSUITS! Not to mention what the Juctice Dept. is going to do to him.

23 posted on 01/26/2009 6:30:04 PM PST by FreeManN (Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

“Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed “
~~~

mmmmmmmm...:0/


24 posted on 01/26/2009 6:30:58 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

Does he have actual physical irrefutable proof of his ineligibility? Can that be posted? Ads taken in newspapers showing THE proof? Going on talk radio and showing the proof to the hosts to be verified by them? If so, when? This needs to get out if it is true, and if the courts say no, we need to get it out to the people. Only about 20 percent of this country (the far left libs) would not care about a unconstitutional candidate taking office when the proof is right there.


I agree. I believe Berg should forget about the law courts for now and go to the court of public opinion. Get the proof out, publicize it so everyone knows our so-called President is a FRAUD.


25 posted on 01/26/2009 6:33:49 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

If somebody wants to tell me in a PM then that will work. The inunction was denied but not the rest of the case? The case under seal is the one I am wondering about.

Someone on the Plains Radio chat said Berg had a certain document and has had it for a while. Is it true???

Could this be why the case is sealed? Is the sealed case dead?


26 posted on 01/26/2009 6:35:09 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Hmmm..so if one of the cases is sealed, it can't be sent back down, disseminated to peers.....it's just gone.

Must have been good.

Aloha Nut Cracker in Chief!

Seems the Northeast freeze has spread to Foggy Bottom.
27 posted on 01/26/2009 6:37:47 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb
Can Berg go to talk radio, show it to Rush, Sean, Mark, Ann and start getting it out that way? There is an end run around the press and we all know it. Why is it not being done? I went to the forum at obamacrimes.com and suggested that, but I was jumped on. I think they think they're going to get their day in court, but I don't see how.
28 posted on 01/26/2009 6:38:43 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: everyone

If you all feel as I do, go to obamacrimes.com’s forum and say so!


29 posted on 01/26/2009 6:39:45 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: everyone

The forum over there is pretty cruddy, though. I’m tanarg there, and my comment is on page 9 of the first thread (dated Jan 25). Awful forum, really, technically.


30 posted on 01/26/2009 6:41:15 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb
The wheels of justice move slowly....The court are still in process....Let the process come to termination.
31 posted on 01/26/2009 6:42:13 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

If someone had ever told me that the United States Supreme Court was in the tank , I would have called them a liar.

I can no longer say that. Their absolute refusal to hear this case in public proves they are supporting an illigitimate President.

They obviously know that people accusing Obama of being illigitimate will not riot > If found that he is bogus ,the other side certainly will. The decision has been made to prevent riots and the Constituion be damned.


32 posted on 01/26/2009 6:45:30 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

Clarence Thomas sleeping through Obama’s inauguration speech. Always a class act.

http://uspolitics.tribe.net/photos/7c90c8ca-c4cb-4477-af78-74402608929c

Did Clarence Thomas Sleep Through the Inauguration?

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/01/23/did-clarence-thomas-sleep-through-the-inauguration/


33 posted on 01/26/2009 6:46:20 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

” I already have Acorn Offices in each of your neighborhoods, and believe me, I know where you live!”

“And maybe you’d like a nice new exotic big cat for your house?” ;)


34 posted on 01/26/2009 6:47:26 PM PST by shoutingandpointing ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

How much damage can he be allowed to do to this country before those wheels fall off the bus??? Give me a break, They had 2 years to vet him prior to the election, and now longer? IMHO, if they have true damning proof, and the courts are sealing and covering up, bring it to the people. Look how fast that blowhard governers wheels of justice moved when it went public. or spitzer. or any number of politicians who caused scandal and it went public before the wheels of justice acted. The people have a right to see this proof and then the media will not have a choice but to cover it and then maybe he will do the right thing and step down before causing more damage to this country. Berg will still get credit for breaking it, and will have his place in history. Really, a patriot will not stand by and watch his country fall to wind his way through a corrupt legal system if he has the proof for all to see. Put up or move on at this point. ( this is not directed AT you hoosier, I am just sick of playing nice when my country is at stake. Conservatives are too polite, that is why we lose)


35 posted on 01/26/2009 6:50:56 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Sounds like a great caper for some brave and clever souls over the next year or two will be to try to get hold of the BC the state of Hawaii claims to have under lock and key and to make it public, so all us dumb rabble citizens who aren’t important enough to have standing before the Supreme Court can finally know the truth.....


36 posted on 01/26/2009 6:52:54 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I can’t believe it? Under seal? The supreme court put it under seal? CAn they do that?


37 posted on 01/26/2009 6:52:57 PM PST by abigail2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fabian; enter the dragon; rebuildus; whatisthetruth; GOP Poet

Well, what now?


38 posted on 01/26/2009 6:56:24 PM PST by abigail2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
The decision has been made to prevent riots and the Constituion be damned.

My thoughts as well.

Although I remember earlier rioting which shut down cities for a time and snuffed the city/states' power base for a while.

Thinking may be that ousting Obama will cause a civil war. Not ousting him will not, that we'll just suffer along until the next election in four years.

Personally, I think it's a Sucker's Bet.
39 posted on 01/26/2009 6:59:08 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks again, LucyT. Does anyone know why the court has placed this under seal?


40 posted on 01/26/2009 7:01:14 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: max americana

Are we sure that the photo of Justice Thomas wasn’t pre-recorded, along with the music?


41 posted on 01/26/2009 7:06:08 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing

Nothing definitive was announced. The courts are afraid of riots, so they shredded the Constitution, instead.


42 posted on 01/26/2009 7:06:19 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FARS; rockinqsranch; nikos1121

Ping.


43 posted on 01/26/2009 7:07:38 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

They’re just telling him to *not skip steps” on the way to the Supreme Court... LOL... The Supreme Court will hear it (maybe, maybe not...), when he’s done what he’s supposed to do...


44 posted on 01/26/2009 7:09:19 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks, LucyT. I don’t know what to think at this point, but as always, I’m holding out hope that Obama’s secrets will be exposed and let the chips fall where they may.


45 posted on 01/26/2009 7:11:44 PM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Outland

Usurper ?
Tyrant = One who rules a government by illegal means.


46 posted on 01/26/2009 7:15:07 PM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abigail2

The Supreme Court put nothing under seal. They haven’t even seen the evidence Berg has. Go to Berg’s site and tell him to reveal his evidence. The man is waiting for his “day in court,” which I do not think is ever going to come, if the future is like the past in that regard. Of course, Berg is a 911 truther, so this all could be a load of hooey for all I know. But I do know O’s fishy as a dead mackerel.


47 posted on 01/26/2009 7:17:02 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: luv2ndamend
Berg also stated that the U.S. Supreme Court denied his request for an Injunction from the Conference that was held on January 16, 2009.

No doubt this was to stop the inauguration. SCOTUS was going to allow BO to commit the crime, not stop it before it was put in to action.

However, the case that was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court, Berg vs. Obama is still pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals where Berg just filed a Brief on 1/20/09. Berg said I had bypassed the Third Circuit hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court would hear our case on an expedited basis because of the significance of the case.

THE SCOTUS is just saying we want the 3rd district to do, the menial tasks: the discovery etc The SC does not do those types of procedures. Just like a fine taylor doesn't make underwear. They are saying before you bring it to us for the final disposition, get the paper work in order. This decision was not decided on merit just a clerical/procedural thing.

This is the 5th time GLOBE Magazine has highlighted the question of Obama’s lack of ‘constitutional qualifications’ to be President

Targeting the Obots: A MUST!

48 posted on 01/26/2009 7:33:23 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CaribouCrossing
Under seal....First thing that comes to my mind is "National Security" There may be more involved than just the BC and his eligibility....

Remember how the markets took a dive when McCain was ahead in October and there was talk that the market was manipulated?......

Remember the influx on money into his account in small "unmarked" donations and his refusal to share that money with the DNC and other members of his party?......

Remember the money laundering and real estate deals being made in the Chicago area with numerous first generation "citizens" involved (not just Rezko...He is just a mule"...People from Iran, Iraq, Syria, India, Pakistan etc etc etc?

Mark my word: There is more to this than the BC>

49 posted on 01/26/2009 7:42:46 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

48 & 49


50 posted on 01/26/2009 7:54:29 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-294 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson