Posted on 01/28/2009 12:34:11 PM PST by rawhide
If they have “dwindling mail volume”.....they should have dwindling costs. I can’t see how the Post Office could loose money when you figure out how much it costs to send packages. I understand that UPS and FedEx is on their board of directors. They probably want to see the Post Office stop shipping packages.
Work less, cost more money - that is the government for you.
Bingo.
In this age, anybody that needs something faster has real options.
Stop delivering all the crap from the supermarkets.
And raise the postage...right? I’d be fine having to go to the post office to pick up if it meant less junk mail.
UPS and FedEx can deliver on Saturdays.
At least make the mailers use first class postage on junk mail rather than the discounted bulk rate. Why should the users of first class mail subsidize the junk mailers?
I live out in the sticks too, the lady gets really snooty when she has to drive the 3/4 mile long driveway for a certified letter.
If she has that attitude again I think I’ll send a certified letter to the guy on our route that breeds pit bulls, really give her something to b*tch about.
Without "junk mail" there wouldn't be a Postal Service just like without commercials there wouldn't be network TV.
Back when I did the original survey (19076/77) and analysis the savings were just right at $1 billion.
Rural delivery service could be advanced nearly a full day on average from present levels ('cause providing all those little bity post offices with rural routes going this way and that, with a lot of backtracking and empty hauls, slows down the mail!).
NOTE: I was never popular with the National League of Postmasters (http://www.postmasters.org/)
One of their past Presidents hated me so much he tried to get me fired ~ he later on ended up getting caught ripping off their medical insurance program and was, last I heard, sent to prison for a long time.
These are the people who prevent USPS from eliminating these problem offices and rationalizing rural delivery.
I don’t know. It is the government. We’ll see.
I wished it had worked that way when I was working on Tour 1, the midnight shift, at a general mail facility back in the 80s. Those endless sacks of mail and mountains of parcels that we had to get out to the star routes by 5:00 AM didn't seem to care that we were working a government job.
Postal pay is indeed good but the ease of the job is vastly overrated for the people who actually have to move the mail working through the night.
Ah yes!....the post office!....How about closing it six days a week?
Answer is Fed Ex and UPS have a small fraction of the number of pieces handled by USPS. Work it out from there.
The pay cuts can be for the double dippers only. It is only fair
I happen to use Stamps.com for the ocassions I have to mail a package. I don’t know about others, but when I go to the post office in either of the two cities I happen to be in, there are long lines of people waiting for a clerk. And the clerks are almost always grumpy and treat you like their doing you a big favor helping you out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumbai_attacks
ML/NJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.