Skip to comments.HSUS Maps Agenda For President
Posted on 01/29/2009 1:40:34 PM PST by wndycndy
WASHINGTON The Humane Society of the United States is asking President Barack Obama and Congress to require everyone who raises dogs and cats to be regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, documents show.
HSUS also is asking for the creation of an animal protection division within the U.S. Department of Justice that is similar to the Civil Rights Division, to ensure strong enforcement of federal animal protection laws, thus granting animals rights similar to humans. HSUS also calls for a new position of animal protection liaison in the White House.
A fourth provision calls for a ban on hunting on new public lands.
Those are only three of the 100 recommendations that HSUS has sent to Obama in what is called a change agenda for animals. The American Sporting Dog Alliance has obtained access to this document, which has been sent to animal protection organizations asking for their support.
HSUS is a radical animal rights group. Despite its name, it does not operate a single animal shelter, but exists only as a political organization. The long-range goal of HSUS is to gradually eliminate all animal ownership and use, including their use as companion and food animals, and to ban hunting.
The 100 goals sent to Obama reflect many issues, but this report will concentrate on the issues that most directly affect dog owners, with added emphasis on the sporting breeds.
However, we urge our readers to read the full HSUS document, which includes a crackdown on alleged farm pollution, tough animal and poultry husbandry and slaughter rules, and many environmental and wildlife management measure. Here is a link the actual document: http://www.hsus.org/web-files/PDF/change-agenda-for-animals-1-14-09.pdf. Please read this document.
In a letter to a New York horse owners association that was made available to the American Sporting Dog Alliance, HSUS President Wayne Pacelle asks for support of the 100-point agenda.
With the changing of the guard at the White House comes the prospect of new possibilities for moving our goals forward, and to mark this latest transfer of power, the HSUS and the Humane Society Legislative Fund (HSLF) are advancing a 100-point Change Agenda for Animals, Pacelle wrote. Never before has the animal protection movement so carefully articulated a vast array of critical animal protection reforms in the domains of so many federal agenciesAgriculture, Interior, Commerce, Defense, Health and Human Services, State, and others.
Dog Breeding Regulation
A top priority of HSUS for several years has been to require federal regulation of everyone who raises dogs and cats. Under current law, only commercial breeders who sell puppies and kittens on a wholesale basis are federally regulated. Hobby breeders who sell puppies or kittens directly to the public are not required to be federally licensed or inspected.
HSUS wants everyone who raises and sells puppies to be licensed and inspected by the USDA, and also wants to see much tougher regulations and standards for animal care.
About four years ago, the HSUS-sanctioned Pet Animal Welfare Act (PAWS) was defeated in Congress by a narrow margin. PAWS would have imposed federal licensing and inspection on all hobby breeders.
Last year, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, who has very close personal and political ties to President Obama, introduced a bill he called PAWS 2, which echoed many of the provisions of its predecessor. When PAWS 2 stalled, Sen. Durbin attempted to attach it as an amendment to the 2008 Farm Bill, but failed to get enough support. Durbin came back with a similar bill in late 2008, dubbed PUPS or Babys Bill, which is formally called the Puppy Uniform Protection Act, but Congress adjourned without taking action.
These bills all originated from HSUS, and all of them clearly were aimed at hobby breeders.
The 100-point agenda says HSUS wants to require all dog and cat breeders to comply with AWA (federal Animal Welfare Act) requirements, including those who sell directly to the public .
It is PAWS all over again.
Now, however, HSUS has a much stronger hand in Washington. In the November election, HSUS strongly endorsed President Obama and had a 95-percent success rate in re-electing the congressional candidates it endorsed. A questionnaire obtained by the American Sporting Dog Alliance showed that the President aggressively sought HSUS endorsement.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance continues to believe that President Obama and many members of Congress will listen to the concerns of dog owners, but only if we stand up in large numbers to defend ourselves and our rights, and take an active role in the political process.
If we do not stand up and be counted in large numbers, we expect HSUS will get its way on most of the measures in the 100-point agenda. Dog owners will have no one to blame but themselves for being relegated to the legal status of second-class citizens. The Bill of Rights and personal freedom always are the first victims of HSUS policy.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance will be working hard to defeat these HSUS legislative proposals, but we need your help if we are to succeed in turning back these challenges. We urge all dog owners to join and support the organization of their choice, and also to support farmers, hunters and other allies in the fight against the HSUS version of a brave new world.
The Rest Of The Story
Here are some other parts of the 100-point agenda that pertain to dog owners in general, and also owners of the sporting breeds in particular. HSUS is calling on President Obama and Congress to:
Create an animal protection division in the Justice Department to act on behalf of animals by aggressive prosecution of people who violate laws about animals. In essence, this gives animals legal status, and the federal government will act as their advocate. HSUS likened it to the Civil Rights Division, which advocates for aggressive protection of human rights. Animals thus would be given the same legal status as people in the Department of Justice.
Create an animal protection liaison in the White House, which would mean that HSUS will have direct access to President Obama and his top advisors to advocate for animal rights groups on policy, regulatory and legislative issues.
Immediately strengthen enforcement of USDA-regulated commercial kennels and other animal owners covered by the Animal Welfare Act. (AWA). Increase USDA budget and staffing for this purpose, and make fines and penalties more severe. Include all vertebrate species under the AWA.
Completely implement the ban on importing dogs from other countries that HSUS succeeded in attaching to the 2008 Farm Bill.
Focus on non-lethal methods to control wildlife populations, which means lessening the use of hunting as a management tool.
Mandate the use of microchips for companion animals, and all other animals covered by the AWA.
Do not open any new public land or national wildlife refuges to hunting.
Transfer all wildlife programs away from the USDA, and put them under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.
Ban hunting on shooting preserves, which HSUS labels canned hunts and calls cruel. Also ban so-called Internet hunting.
Make it a crime to show anything that HSUS calls animal cruelty in films, on television, in books and magazine, or on the Internet. Require the Department of Justice to collect and analyze data on animal cruelty cases and create a separate crime database for this information.
Require the U.S. Census Bureau and the Center for Disease Control to include questions about the animals people own when surveying the public, in order to assess impacts on human health and well-being, develop more effective approaches to community animal control, and ensure appropriate disaster preparation.
Allow foreign animal rights groups to have an official advisory role in the United States.
Ban the mail shipment of any kind of birds or animals through the U.S. Postal Service, including for agriculture and sport. Baby chicks were specifically mentioned, and this also would apply to gamebird chicks, adults and eggs that are used by sporting dog trainers and in field trials.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We also welcome people who work with other breeds, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by your donations in order to maintain strict independence.
Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org. Our email is firstname.lastname@example.org.
PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
The American Sporting Dog Alliance http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org Please Join Us
Every time I post on a thread like this I see that some folks don’t think there is a right to breed dogs (or cats), which surprises me on a conservative website. At any rate, most I know involved in showing dogs have been paying attention, and I suspect Obama will come out on the side of HSUS.
Hunting Dog Ping!
But that is just the way it is. It happens when individual rights are taken away and group rights are placed just as happened in Nazi Germany, the USSR and many other left wing countries.
The breeders in this country that need regulating ARE NOT the ones who breed animals.
There is a syndrome that afflicts many people who join organizations. I try not to go too far over that line, realizing I’m a member of one here.
The sad fact is though, that people who join orgs like the humane society, or green organizations, they often lose perspective and go spiraling out of control.
Look, I like animals and the planet, but for heaven’s sake, keep it in perspective. Try to keep it to reasoned goals, not some so narrowly focused premise that when you present it to others you sound like a stark raving lunatic.
This goal of the Humane Society sounds like the goal of a fruitcake.
Back off you lunatics.
The government is big enough already. It doesn’t need to reach into my home and regulate me with regard to my pets. This is sheer lunacy!
LOL! Well said MissEdie! :)
There are a number of liberals who post here. Those against animal breeding are not conservatives. Animal breeding is a property rights issue and property rights is a core issue for conservatism.
This is just what the US needs:
“Dog Sex” police! /s
I know there are others I should ping and am overlooking.
Could you all hit your ping lists?
As I’ve said on here many times, the HSUS doesn’t feed, house, neuter or spay any animals with the (last time I checked) $150 million annually they raise. And they don’t provide any money for local shelters.
Check out the HSUS demands. They endorsed Obama and campaigned heavily for him. This is where your money goes if you donate to the HSUS freepers (not those I pinged, I know they don’t).
The letter came from the commander of the unit that our AKC Kennel Club sent K9 supplies to. This is from the Battalion level, not the guys on the ground...its their boss’s boss.
If it weren’t for dog shows and kennel clubs we wouldn’t have had this money to send to our K9 Troops.
Permission to crosspost granted~
Souhegan Kennel Club BOD
Published in Nashua Telegraph, Nashua NH.
Soldiers thankful for kennel club support
Published: Monday, January 26, 2009
To the editor:
I wanted to extend my greatest appreciation for the Souhegan Kennel Clubs efforts to support our specialty search dogs here in Iraq.
Your donations to support the canines on ground here have had a profound impact on their morale and quality of life. Often this element of the military has specific needs that can be easily overlooked.
Because of your efforts, the soldiers responsible for these animals have been able to provide them regular checks between missions. These needs may seem minute to an organization of your caliber, but your support has been critical to ensuring the happiness and good health of our animals. The collapsible bowls, toys and grooming supplies provided were met with great anticipation and excitement by both our canines and their handlers.
These animals provide a vital mission and often are responsible for saving the lives of many American sons and daughters. Your organization has improved the quality of life for our animals. I appreciate your efforts and thank you for all that you do. Without organizations such as yours contributing to our efforts here in Iraq, our military would certainly have faced a more difficult time.
Lt. Col. Joel Cross,
5th Engineer Battalion, Iraq
The vet I used to work for used to call the rabid animal rights folks humaniacs. I’ve never come up with a better moniker!
I agree with you.
Yes, that is a pretty good one.
Yes, ‘the privacy of our own homes’ and all... I guess these sayings are only good as the effort they are spouted to support, in the minds of a leftist.
I heartily agree with your property rights premise.
One problem is that, for years, the dog show community has spoken of their dogs as if they were people, so I think the natural progression (by those who are inclined to do away with pets entirely) is to take up that lexicon (for instance, calling your dogs your fur kids) and use it against them. I love my dogs, but if I thought of them the same way I did my kids, how could I ever breed them?
They will pry my sweet babies out of my cold, dead hands. I think I’d die if I lost them. 18 years of my life with my first dog and when he died, I thought I’d buried my heart with him. They’ll never get my latest rescue dog away from me, or my Stray Rescue Boxer, either. Our dogs are family and loved so deeply. I wait all day to just be with them and they with me. Hubby is retired and absolutely adores them. HSUS can go pound sand.
I agree. I also think the move is to grant animals human rights level status, and that is just crazy.
I love my dog and I’ve had cats in my life as well. Whether conservative or liberal if I see mistreatment of animals I become a enraged and could easily become a radical against those who would purposely mistreat animals in their care or even not in their care. People who will do this are the lowest form of animals in my view and deserve no consideration in justice or fairness. They are murderers and sadists just waiting for the opportunity to practice their crafts on humans in the same way.
Joan, if you generally agree with me, then you should realize that I would have the same reaction to what you mentioned as you would.
No amount of regulation would stop that. Good neighbors calling in would. We both think that type of person should pay a heavy price for doing that.
I also agree that folks who are cruel to animals, are a real threat to treat humans inhumanely as well.
That is a wonderful cause. It would be a tragedy for animals if the clubs were unable to continue this true humane work. The clubs themselves are dependent on the continuation of the varieties of dogs and the activities they inspire.
More “Breaking News” :(
A SAOVA message to sportsmen, pet owners and farmers concerned about protecting their traditions, avocations and livelihoods from anti-hunting, anti-breeding, animal guardianship advocates. Forwarding and cross posting, with attribution, encouraged.
When was HSUS elected to represent Illinois District 11?
Representative John Fritchey (D, 11) recently introduced House Bill 198, Licensing - Dog Breeder (aka Chloes Bill), an overzealous, animal rightist anti-breeder piece of legislation. Every breeder in the state who owns 3 or more intact female dogs would be classified as a commercial entity, subjected to licensing, impossible kennel regulations, invasive inspections inside their homes, and excessive record keeping and reporting. Completing the assault on dog breeders is the proposed bills requirement for fingerprinting and criminal background checks.
A constituent emailed the following to Rep. Fritchey: Under your proposed legislation I would be subject to a criminal background check and fingerprinting, an untrained investigator would have access to my home and could at any time inspect my “facilities” and demand that I build a kennel that meets their idea of what is appropriate as well as exceeding USDA standards. She continues, I certainly think that you need to go back and look at what you are proposing recognizing that there are honest, decent people who you will hurt if this is passed.
Unbelievably, her email was answered by Jordan Matyas, the HSUS Illinois State Director!
When did HSUS take charge of answering correspondence for legislators? Was HSUS elected to represent Illinois constituents in the 11th District? Has Matyas been hired as a staff member or consultant?
In his reply Matyas does not even give direct answers, rather repeats the standard HSUS rhetoric about the need to regulate bad breeders then placates the writer with a pretended interest in hearing her concerns.
The audacity of Rep. Fritchey deferring correspondence to HSUS is nothing short of breath-taking. The gauntlet has been thrown down and dog breeding in the state of Illinois is being criminalized. All breeders, hobbyists and sportsmen need to begin a concerted effort to oppose this legislation.
HB 198 has been referred to the Rules Committee. Talking points and contact information to oppose HB 198 are now posted on the SAOVA website http://www.saova.org/Illinois.html We will provide further updates as information becomes available.
SAOVA commends Rep. Michael P. McAuliffe (R, 20) and Rep. JoAnn D. Osmond (R, 61) for removing themselves as cosponsors.
Please share this message widely.
Sportsmen’s and Animal Owners’ Voting Alliance - http://saova.org
Issue lobbying and working to identify and elect supportive legislators