Posted on 01/30/2009 5:05:50 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
At 52 he couldn’t have had a job and been supporting himself and keeping his hands off children? Nobody made him do that.
I was wondering whether to be happy or sad. Thank you for clearing that up. I’m happy.
I’m always surprised when people try to carry on a discussion based on glimpsing headlines alone. Too many times the headline negates the premise on which they base their argument! Stupid people!
A quick search of the Michigan sex offender registry identifies his crime as: Criminal Sexual Conduct 2nd Degree (Person Under 13). I won’t lose any sleep because this POS is taking a dirt nap. I do, however, find it interesting that Scott Michaels did not feel the need to publish the fact that this guy was a pedophile in his bleeding heart, cry me a river story about this dirtbag.
“Marge Palmerlee” does not score any points with me. Go get a job, pervert.
Sorry to sound so insensitive..............
This is discrimination based on sexual preference!!!
You can find the information here........if its still available.
Well, I do.
Dying from freezing to death is much kinder than what I'd mete out to perverts.
Let's hear what he did and then I'll decide for myself
I do feel a bit sorry for him. But also I'm very curious to know how serious his "sex crimes" were. All the article says is:
...convicted of criminal sexual conduct in 1991,...
But what does that mean? Is the guy really dangerous or not? This doesn't really tell me.
Whew, I'm getting seriously cynical, aren't I?
I wish reporters would do their damn job and fill in exactly what he was charged with, so you can figure out if the guy really was trouble or not. They leave out the most important part. If they did it on purpose it’s because it was bad and would turn off sympathy for him. If they didn’t do it on purpose they’re just typical dumbass veneer journalists.
Can we start an assault on mis-placed “compassion” first, and then all of political correct whining with this story?
“Oh well”.
I mean, seriously.
The correct descriptive is “pedosicle”
So what’s the problem?
If sexual offenders should be executed, so be it. What we should not do is what we do now: release them from prison AND prohibit them from living in most places, thereby encouraging them to go off the grid. My point was these current laws are making children LESS safe.
Reporters leave out data intentionally because they have an agenda to fulfill.
I’m very ambivalent about this case. I certainly agree that pedophiles need to be strongly punished and removed from positions where they can prey on children. On the other hand this guy was convicted 18 years ago of a pretty vague offense. What the heck is 2nd degree criminal sexual conduct anyways? Could it mean that some kid saw him urinating in an alley? Or maybe his neighbor got offended when he gave his kid a piggyback ride? I just don’t know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.