Bill creates detention camps in U.S. for 'emergencies'

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | February 01, 2009 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Man50D]

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., has introduced to the House of Representatives a new bill, H.R. 645, calling for the secretary of homeland security to establish no fewer than six national emergency centers for corralling civilians on military installations.

The proposed bill, which has received little mainstream media attention, appears designed to create the type of detention center that those concerned about use of the military in domestic affairs fear could be used as concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany.

The bill also appears to expand the president's emergency power, much as the executive order signed by President Bush on May 9, 2007, that – as WND reported – gave the president the authority to declare an emergency and take over the direction of all federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments without even consulting Congress.

[Dustbunny]

Much better (from the fedgoon perspective) to build Supermax prisons far out in the boondocks, away from all cities, where visitors, protesters and reporters will never come.

That is a possibility. I suggest Alaska, the very northern part.

[sionnsar]

What do you think of bill to create detention camps in U.S. for 'emergencies'? (1995 votes)

It is now more than clear the federal government is rapidly goose-stepping its way toward tyranny	36% (718)
Hello?! Does Nazi Germany ring any bells?	35% (702)
There's little doubt the government would use such camps for malicious purposes on its own citizens	11% (217)
There are intended harmful consequences couched under the guise of preparedness	5% (107)
If the bill is from the nutcase congressman Alcee Hastings, you know it's a bad idea	5% (106)
This is what we get with Democrats in control, and I don't like it one bit	4% (81)
I see both benefits and dangers in this idea. It's a tough call	1% (23)
While the bill sounds good, there could be unintended consequences harmful to Americans	1% (18)
Other	1% (13)
Great idea. We need to be ready to respond to emergencies	0% (5)
We can never be prepared enough for disasters, so this is very pragmatic	0% (5)
Everything seems kosher in the bill's language, so I think it's fine	0% (0)

[FreeManN]

I wonder how Bob the BO’s lawyer will answer to this?

PHONE: 202.628.6600

Robert (Bob) Bauer is currently counsel to Obama for America and the Democratic Senatorial and Congressional Campaign Committees, and has served as co-counsel to the New Hampshire State Senate in the trial of Chief Justice David A. Brock (2000).

607 Fourteenth Street N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-2003

PHONE: 202.628.6600 FAX: 202.434.1690

[FreeManN]

Citizen’s grand juries

We need volunteers to coordinate and form citizen’s grand juries all over the country. Evidence of Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama’s ineligibility/illegitimacy for presidency will be presented to those Citizen’s Grand Juries for their decision on indictment or presentment. If you want to coordinate National or state or local effort in this matter, please e-mail me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com

[FreeManN]

Citizen’s grand juries

We need volunteers to coordinate and form citizen’s grand juries all over the country. Evidence of Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama’s ineligibility/illegitimacy for presidency will be presented to those Citizen’s Grand Juries for their decision on indictment or presentment. If you want to coordinate National or state or local effort in this matter, please e-mail me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com

[Charles Martel]

This is frustrating. Why don’t people learn? It’s not as if this hasn’t been “done before” in history...

"What good fortune for leaders, that the people do not think."

-Adolf Hitler

[FreeManN]

Citizen’s grand juries

We need volunteers to coordinate and form citizen’s grand juries all over the country. Evidence of Barry Soetoro-Barack Obama’s ineligibility/illegitimacy for presidency will be presented to those Citizen’s Grand Juries for their decision on indictment or presentment. If you want to coordinate National or state or local effort in this matter, please e-mail me at dr_taitz@yahoo.com

http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/

[bfree]

I think you are niave.

I just hope the camp they send me to is warmer than Chicago in the winter.
A revolt is brewing and the left will regret it.

[Boucheau]

Conservatives are so blind and such sheep.

These camps are for you, idiots.

Close Gitmo and build camps for Americans.

Oh, but, don’t you worry your little “it can’t happen here.” heads it will still be a while before the fascist-left visits your house.

When you, uh, I should say: IF YOU, finally wake up and see that they are taking over your country you will get angry and take to the streets. By then, however, the grip on your collective throats will be so firm that you will only be gassed, rounded up and taken to these camps—or worse.

I know, I know, how extreme of me, it can’t happen here, right?

All of us gun owners will rally and take on the US military, right?

This will be but a luxurious convenience for our dear leaders as they have a “good reason” to mow us down en masse.

The tipping point is fast approaching.

[Man50D]

Oh, but, don’t you worry your little “it can’t happen here.”

I called a local talk show host who has often cited Corsi's articles on other tpocis. I started to inform him of Corsi's article. The host suddenly cut me off, lambasted Corsi and me by denying any such thing could ever happen in America. This host claims to be a conservative but he supports the likes of Lieberman and McCain. This guy has his head in the sand. Today was the last time I'll ever listen to his show.

[Boucheau]

These people have no idea just how fragile it all is.

They see permanence where none exists.

If the US cannot be otherwise destroyed in this way then why did the founding fathers work so hard to prevent it?

Why do we need a constitution if America is impervious to this quiet war that the left is presently waging?

They will wake up, Man50D, but it will be too late by then.

They cannot handle even the thought of it all falling down.

These are likely the same people that will blow their heads off when the truth hits them like a freight train.

Here’s what they need to understand:

Once the right is marginalized the battle is then between liberals and communists—guess who wins that one?

And we know what it looks like at the end of this road—stagnation and death.

But, hey, 0bama and the Rino’s mean well.

[FreeManN]

A Call for a Few Good Men

http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/

[SpaceBar]

Within two months of being elected in 1933, Hitler passed the Enabling Acts giving the Nazis sweeping powers, and established the first of many concentration camps in the sleepy town of Dachau outside of Munich. So we are pretty much right on schedule.

[FreeManN]

A Call for a few Good Men & Women to Unite for Our Country

To find standing the Court need look no further than the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States, “We the people of the United States in order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.” Thus, “we the people,” individually, are established as one party among many to a contract binding upon the executors of this contract, our Constitution.

Who then are the executors of this contract with the people?

“We the people” in this cause assert that anyone and everyone who takes Oath to be bound by our Constitution becomes a party to this agreement.

Foremost among the parties counterbalanced upon this executory contract is the President of the United States, the Chief Executive or Executor of the Constitutional Contract.

When is the President bound to this contract, our Constitution? “We the People” contend that he is bound immediately, upon the taking of the Oath. In the instant case, Barack Hussein Obama became bound to our Constitutional Contract on January 20, 2009.

As in the cause of Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803), “We the People” seek fullfillment of our executory contract, our Constitution, by way of a Writ of Mandamus upon the executor by oath of said contract, the President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.

As succinctly stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury, “If a persons duty is backed by law and not by political in nature, then he becomes subject of the law and is examinable by the court.”

Thus, Barack Hussein Obama, having bound himself contractually by law to our Constitutional Contract is subject to the jurisdiction of the law, in this case the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court.

It is stated in United States v. Butterworth, 18 S. Ct. 441, 169 U.S. 600 at 602 (1898),

The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent. But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ.”

Following much good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States, “We the People” have found no cases in the history of jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over “all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article III, Section 2.

That being the case, “We the People” respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction over our cause.

[rcrngroup]

So other than just hating WND because it happens to be a CONSERVATIVE news media, who is your source for unbiased, legitimate news? I would stack the integrity & honesty of Joeseph Farah OR Jerome Corsi or any of the WND columnists over any lamebrain media today including Fox & arrogant pompous O’Reilly. The deranged liberal lefties love to attack Joe Farah, or Jerome Corsi in writing the book ObamaNation or Unfit for Command, but so far they can’t prove any of it to be false. What is your motive for attacking WND, unless it’s the truth that offends you???

[rcrngroup]

And by the way, when I see your tagline “Go Israel”, Israel doesn’t have any better or stronger supporter than Joseph Farah and other staunch conservative Christians. Joseph Farah has writen numerous articles disclosing both U.S. attempts & secular left-wing Israeli attempts to split Jerusalem or return all captured lands back to the Muslims with no binding concessions on the Muslims. You better be thankful for Joseph Farah & most WND columnists taking principled stands & writing articles to expose those who would destroy Israel.

[Rebelbase]

This has been making the rounds on tin foil websites for a few years now, up until now it would have been met with scorn and contempt here at FR.

[Scotswife]

LOL!

I have my reasons and your attempt to read my mind have fallen flat.

Needless to say, I doubt I have any opinion you wish to discuss, so you may proceed in assuming the worst about me FRiend.

[puppypusher]

It's time to place some of these Tax Cheats that work in the Senate and for the Obama Administration in these Camps for 10 years.

They would do that to any working guy or gal that did the same.Especially if they couldn’t afford the cost of a high class attorney.

[rcrngroup]

Ok, will do.
You're right, I don't understand your thinking or refusal to explain yourself, other than just a seemingly innate hatred against Joe Farah & WND for courageously writing articles & truth that the rest of media prefers to sweep under the carpet. You remind me of 80% of the Jewish community who claim to support Israel and then votes for Obuckabooma & demoRATs out of some irrational thinking when in fact the liberals & demoRAT socialist party are the worst enemy that Israel has.