Skip to comments.
Iran Puts First Homemade Satellite in Orbit
FoxNews.com ^
| Tuesday, February 03, 2009
Posted on 02/03/2009 5:22:11 AM PST by Joiseydude
TEHRAN, Iran Iran has successfully sent its first domestically made satellite into orbit, the country's president announced Tuesday, claiming a significant step in an ambitious space program that has worried many international observers.
The satellite, called Omid, or hope in Farsi, was launched late Monday after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gave the order to proceed, according to a report on state radio. State television showed footage of what it said was the nighttime liftoff of the rocket carrying the satellite at an unidentified location in Iran.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; satellite
To: Joiseydude
2
posted on
02/03/2009 5:25:59 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
(Chevron 7 will not engage!)
To: Joiseydude
Omid they can believe in.
And BO wanted to stop our programs to knock these things outa the sky. Looks like another champain issue in a couple of years.
3
posted on
02/03/2009 5:26:17 AM PST
by
Colvin
(Harry Reid is a sap sucking idiot.)
To: Colvin
Don’t miss the point -
being able to “orbit a satellite” means
“being able to drop a nuke anywhere on the planet”
4
posted on
02/03/2009 5:27:33 AM PST
by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
To: MrB
being able to orbit a satellite meansbeing able to drop a nuke anywhere on the planet
Yep
5
posted on
02/03/2009 5:29:44 AM PST
by
Joiseydude
(Obama: "Putting my ideals into effect are more important than your safety from terrorist acts")
To: Joiseydude

First available photo...
Seriously, though. This IS scary news. Gotta laugh or you'll cry. God knows 0bama won't do chit about this and shoot the thing down!
6
posted on
02/03/2009 5:30:01 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Joiseydude
“The satellite, called Omid, or ‘Hope’ in Farsi...”
Terrific! They named it after ‘Dear Leader!’ *SPIT*
7
posted on
02/03/2009 5:30:50 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Joiseydude
“Iran has successfully sent its first domestically made satellite into orbit, the country’s president announced Tuesday,...”
He’s been known to make claims of success in the past, when it wasn’t necessarily so.
8
posted on
02/03/2009 5:30:53 AM PST
by
G Larry
(Barack's character has been molded by extremists)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Hopefully it ends up like this---
9
posted on
02/03/2009 5:33:27 AM PST
by
John W
To: Joiseydude
This, like Sputnik, Vanguard or any of the other early satellites is about lifting power. If you can put a satellite into orbit you can put a nuke half way around the world. Putting up a satellite is the polite way of saying to the world mess with me at your peril. The only message this satellite will send is that we have waited too long to deal with Iran. But that message it is sending loud and clear.

That beep beep beep is Russian for "go ahead make my day".
10
posted on
02/03/2009 5:33:59 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: Joiseydude
It was a trashcan with a sparkler attached to it. Somehow I’ll still sleep tonight.
11
posted on
02/03/2009 5:35:10 AM PST
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: Joiseydude
State television showed footage of what it said was the nighttime liftoff of the rocket carrying the satellite at an unidentified location in Iran. Here's an excerpt from and August 2008 report....
Other features of the launch raised suspicions, including the odd fact that it occurred at night. This runs counter to the long-established practice of launching test missions in full daylight so that cameras and visual observers can notice any anomalies during the early ascent into space.
After the launch, the initial (and later corrected) Iranian press reports echoed this theme: "The satellite was sent into orbit today on the occasion of the birthday anniversary of Shiites' 12th Imam (May God Hasten His Reappearance), thus illustrating the auspicious name of the Imam in the space."
The references to a hidden religious leader relate to Ahmadinejad's claims that a messianic Muslim ruler known as the Imam Mahdi, foretold by Shiite texts, would soon make himself known. Some have even speculated that the name of the rocket and satellite, Safir-e Omid, or Messenger of Hope, refers to Ahmadinejads world view.
There's a little too much hope and messiah stuff going around these days.
12
posted on
02/03/2009 5:36:24 AM PST
by
edpc
To: edpc
13
posted on
02/03/2009 5:36:47 AM PST
by
edpc
To: MrB
Thats the only thing it really ever meant for us.
14
posted on
02/03/2009 5:39:19 AM PST
by
Delta 21
( MKC USCG - ret)
To: Joiseydude
re: The reports were not immediately verified by outside observers.
And thereby hangs the tale. The article is chock full of “The report said . . .”, “Ahmadinejad said . . .”, etc.
Do we really know the object is up there?
I grant it probably is, but I would like to see what the guys who spend their lives tracking objects in space have to say about it!
15
posted on
02/03/2009 5:45:08 AM PST
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America!)
To: Joiseydude
I wonder where their boosters drop, as they are not next to an ocean or extremely large like Russia.
16
posted on
02/03/2009 5:48:25 AM PST
by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: SampleMan
I wonder where their boosters drop, as they are not next to an ocean or extremely large like Russia. Downtown Tel Aviv is the plan.
17
posted on
02/03/2009 5:51:41 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Atlas Shrugged until Obama made shrugging while white a hate crime.)
To: Joiseydude
Iranian television said the satellite would orbit at an altitude of between 155 and 250 miles. It was taken into orbit by a Safir-2, or ambassador-2, rocket, which was first tested in August and has a range of 155 miles. so let see, the missile used for the launch that has a range of 155 miles, can put something into orbit giving it an effective range of 25,000 miles. It has to be one or another.
18
posted on
02/03/2009 5:52:39 AM PST
by
Vaquero
( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Joiseydude
Iranian television said the satellite would orbit at an altitude of between 155 and 250 miles. It was taken into orbit by a Safir-2, or ambassador-2, rocket, which was first tested in August and has a range of 155 miles. Hmmm . . . Talk about a free lunch. How can a rocket with a range of 155 miles get its payload up to as high as 250 miles? Sounds like more 'new math' to me!
19
posted on
02/03/2009 5:58:36 AM PST
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America!)
To: jwparkerjr
They’re NEA school graduates, probably.
20
posted on
02/03/2009 5:59:54 AM PST
by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
To: SampleMan
Depends on the inclination they were shooting for. Generally you launch east - to gain speed from the earth’s rotation. They could shoot southeast at a moderate inclination and probably drop their booster in the Indian ocean. A lower inclination orbital insertion would probably drop the booster in Afghanistan or Pakistan. Not a real friendly act towards your neighbors.
21
posted on
02/03/2009 5:59:59 AM PST
by
CodeMasterPhilzar
(I love my Country, but I now genuinely fear my government.)
To: jwparkerjr
Do we really know the object is up there?
Sputnik had two switched carrier transmitters at 20MHz and 40MHz that made sure everybody, including ham operators, knew the satellite was in orbit. You could hear the Doppler shift as the craft rose and set.
22
posted on
02/03/2009 6:07:41 AM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: Joiseydude
Here's a secret CIA photo of the launch...
23
posted on
02/03/2009 6:11:19 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Dissent Is Patriotic!)
To: Thrownatbirth
I was on a Boy Scout overnight camping trip the Saturday we awoke to hear the news that Sputnik was in orbit. Our leader was a ham operator and lost no time at all in locating the beep beep of the satellite.
24
posted on
02/03/2009 6:14:27 AM PST
by
jwparkerjr
(God Bless America!)
To: jwparkerjr
"Talk about a free lunch. How can a rocket with a range of 155 miles get its payload up to as high as 250 miles? "
Similar to the Redstone (147 miles) that we used for our first satellite launches. It can put a few tons 155 miles or a few kilos into orbit. Either that or they stuck a second stage on it and just used the IRBM to get out of the thick lower atmosphere.
25
posted on
02/03/2009 6:15:17 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: MrB
being able to drop a nuke anywhere on the planet Not necessarily. It is an important step but... There are still several significant engineering hurdles.
The first question is throw weight. Or more directly, total impulse their system can produce. I haven't been able to find the weight of their satellite. It is one thing to push maybe a couple hundred lbs into a low orbit. However, throwing a first generation nuclear device is a different matter. That is more likely going to be nearly a ton of payload. Granted, it isn't headed for orbit, so it doesn't need to hit the same velocity. But it still needs a big stick to get it down range...
The next problem is simply making the physics package survive re-entry. The life of an ICBM warhead is pretty tough. Start off with some significant shock and vibration at liftoff. Throw in some ascent heating due to atmospheric friction. Then you hit the cold of space and solar radiation. Then a brutal decent angle that smacks the atmosphere at a significant re-entry angle and tremendous G load. Friction heating and aerodymamic buffeting... The upshot is, a science experiment in a cave in North Korea or Iran is not the same thing as a viable, reliable weapon.
Then there's the whole accuracy thing. Once you get your lift vehicle sorted out, and your re-entry vehicle ready... You have to have your system know where it is fairly accurately, including velocity, and be able to make some adjustments...
I'm not saying this Iranian launch is nothing to worry about - far from it. It is a big concern. I'm just saying it is not time to start digging a bomb shelter in the back yard. The missile defense program should sit up and take notice though. The really disturbing thing about the Iranian launch is the deliberate and apparently well thought-out development program they are following. They're not making many mistakes, and they're taking their time, getting the engineering right. That tells me this is a long-term no-sh*t for-real program to them. This is not some flash program they're using to try to scare their neighbors or gain negotiation points. This is not a program O and crew are going to be able to talk them out of.
26
posted on
02/03/2009 6:22:06 AM PST
by
CodeMasterPhilzar
(I love my Country, but I now genuinely fear my government.)
To: Joiseydude
"Homemade" sounds rather pejorative.
"In 2005, Iran launched its first commercial satellite on a Russian rocket in a joint project with Moscow, which appears to be the main partner in transferring space technology to Iran."
27
posted on
02/03/2009 6:23:05 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5(SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|TaglineSpaceForRent)
To: jwparkerjr
The reports were not immediately verified by outside observers. My first question too.
28
posted on
02/03/2009 6:24:34 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5(SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|TaglineSpaceForRent)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
You obviously know what you’re talking about. I haven’t heard the term “throw weight” since my days at Strategic Air Command back in the 80’s.
29
posted on
02/03/2009 6:25:30 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(You think I'm crazy? I got your crazy right here!)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
"But it still needs a big stick to get it down range"
Exactly. Do they have an R-7 or a scud with a second stage. It shouldn't be too hard to find out since a satellite in orbit can be tracked and its mass measured with a good degree of precision.
Remember that the R-7 was late 1940's technology taken to extreme size. And our Atlas was only slightly more advanced. Neither even attempted to do something as simple as staging, in both designs all engines are started at lift off, although some drop off when no longer needed. We built those things with vacuum tubes and slide rules. Sure they took an hour for launch prep, longer for the R-7, but they worked. Nobody would be surprised if the Iranians could build a copy of a MiG-15, yet the nuclear bomb, and the ICBM to deliver it are the same vintage technology.
30
posted on
02/03/2009 6:31:50 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: jwparkerjr
That's great. Nowdays, ham operators have routine conversations with space crews.
I once talked with Shannon Lucid when she was aboard Mir. She told me Post-It stickies don't work well in zero-G and she couldn't wait for the next Shuttle to bring her a stapler. You could also hear metallic noise in the background as Mir heated and expanded in the sunlight.
31
posted on
02/03/2009 6:34:19 AM PST
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: Joiseydude
Ready for liftoff supreme leader
(allah-aka-barry!)....
32
posted on
02/03/2009 6:38:54 AM PST
by
domeika
To: Joiseydude
Hah!!! No big deal - we did a satellite launch down in Mississippi too:
33
posted on
02/03/2009 6:42:13 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
(Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
To: IrishPennant
So that is why the Muslims use a half moon as their symbol.
34
posted on
02/03/2009 6:46:32 AM PST
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: GonzoGOP
Bwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....That was just crappy of you
35
posted on
02/03/2009 6:53:42 AM PST
by
IrishPennant
(Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
“....I haven’t been able to find the weight of their satellite....”
According to AP, in another article, it weighed 60 pounds, had eight antenna and two frequencies.
If, Iran got their hands on a Russian suit case nuke, all they’d need is a reentry vehicle.
36
posted on
02/03/2009 6:54:43 AM PST
by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: Thrownatbirth
Sputnik had two switched carrier transmitters at 20MHz and 40MHz that made sure everybody, including ham operators, knew the satellite was in orbit. You could hear the Doppler shift as the craft rose and set. Not only that you could visually verify that Sputnik was indeed going around the world simply by looking up at the right time, depending on your global position of course!
37
posted on
02/03/2009 6:55:58 AM PST
by
calex59
To: Joiseydude
Until NORAD verifies the presence and orbit of the so-claimed satellite, this is just Ahmabinanutjob — as usual — barking thru his nether orifice.
38
posted on
02/03/2009 6:59:49 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
To: Joiseydude
Omid spelled backwards is DIMO.....................
39
posted on
02/03/2009 7:04:33 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Stimulus bill? I haven't seen so much pork flying since the packing house exploded!.....)
To: Joiseydude
Does the sat have to face Mecca and pray 5 times a day? Given that in low earth orbit a “day” is about 90 minutes, that should keep it pretty busy.
To: IrishPennant
41
posted on
02/03/2009 8:53:48 AM PST
by
dusttoyou
(HNIC)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
That would have to be South-Southeast, or cross your fingers approach to the Bay of Bengal. I’ll have to check NOTAMS and see if they selected a spot.
42
posted on
02/03/2009 12:51:25 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: SampleMan
NOTAMS... You think they were nice enough to notify the international community? It would be interesting to know, if they did, how much notice they gave. Gives us a chance to get the intel assets on line...
43
posted on
02/03/2009 7:05:29 PM PST
by
CodeMasterPhilzar
(I love my Country, but I now genuinely fear my government.)
To: CodeMasterPhilzar
NOTAMS... You think they were nice enough to notify the international community? Fully tongue in cheek.
44
posted on
02/03/2009 7:54:32 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: TXnMA
45
posted on
02/05/2009 9:46:25 AM PST
by
Tommyjo
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson