Skip to comments.Vatican Official: Bishops Have no Choice But to Refuse Communion to Pro-Abort Politicians
Posted on 02/04/2009 11:59:01 AM PST by wagglebee
ROME, January 30, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Archbishop Raymond Burke, in an exclusive interview last week, told LifeSiteNews.com that the issue of pro-abortion politicians continuing to receive Holy Communion is still one of major concern and that it is the duty of bishops to ensure that they are refused.
He told LifeSiteNews.com, "I don't understand the continual debate that goes on about it. There's not a question that a Catholic who publicly, and after admonition, supports pro-abortion legislation is not to receive Holy Communion and is not to be given Holy Communion."
"The Church's law is very clear," said Archbishop Burke, who was appointed last year by Pope Benedict XVI as the head of the Church's highest court, the Apostolic Signatura. "The person who persists publicly in grave sin is to be denied Holy Communion, and it [Canon Law] doesn't say that the bishop shall decide this. It's an absolute."
Among the US bishops directly to address the issue, Archbishop Burke was one of around a dozen who vigorously supported a directive of the Vatican that said pro-abortion Catholic politicians "must be refused" Holy Communion if they attempt to receive at Mass. Others have refused to abide by the Vatican instruction and the Church's own Code of Canon Law, saying they would rather focus on "education" of such politicians.
Archbishop Burke called "nonsense" the accusation, regularly made by some bishops, that refusing Holy Communion "makes the Communion rail a [political] battle ground". In fact, he said, the precise opposite is true. The politician who insists on being seen receiving Holy Communion, despite his opposition to the Church's central teachings, is using that reception for political leverage.
In 2004, when self-proclaimed Catholic and candidate for the Democrat party, Sen. John Kerry, was frequently photographed receiving Holy Communion despite his vigorous support of abortion, the US Bishops Conference issued a document which said only that it is up to individual bishops whether to implement the Church's code of Canon Law and refuse Communion. The issue has remained prominent with the appointment of Joe Biden, another pro-abortion Catholic politician, as Vice President of the United States of America.
Archbishop Burke recalled previous experiences with Kerry, pointing to the several occasions when the senator was pictured in Time magazine receiving Communion from Papal representatives at various public events. Burke said that it is clear that Kerry was using his reception of Holy Communion to send a message.
"He wants to not only receive Holy Communion from a bishop but from the papal representative. I think that's what his point was. Get it in Time magazine, so people read it and say to themselves, 'He must be in good standing'."
"What are they doing? They're using the Eucharist as a political tool."
In refusing, far from politicising the Eucharist, the Church is returning the matter to its religious reality. The most important reasons to refuse, he said, are pastoral and religious in nature.
"The Holy Eucharist, the most sacred reality of our life in the Church, has to be protected against sacrilege. At the same time, individuals have to be protected for the sake of their own salvation from committing one of the gravest sins, namely to receive Holy Communion unworthily."
Archbishop Burke also dismissed the commonly proffered excuse that such politicians need more "education". Speaking from his own direct experience, he said that Catholic politicians who are informed by their pastors or bishops that their positions in support of pro-abortion legislation makes it impossible for them to receive Holy Communion, "I've always found that they don't come forward."
"When you talk to these people, they know," he said. "They know what they're doing is very wrong. They have to answer to God for that, but why through our pastoral negligence add on to that, that they have to answer to God for who knows how many unworthy receptions of Holy Communion?"
Archbishop Burke said that the issue had been debated enough. He rejected the idea that the matter should be left to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, saying the Conference has no authority in the matter. "This is a law of the universal Church and it should be applied."
"I think this argument too is being used by people who don't want to confront the issue, this whole 'wait 'til the Conference decides'...well the Conference has been discussing this since at least 2004. And nothing happens."
When asked what the solution was, he responded, "Individual bishops and priests simply have to do their duty. They have to confront politicians, Catholic politicians, who are sinning gravely and publicly in this regard. And that's their duty.
"And if they carry it out, not only can they not be reproached for that, but they should be praised for confronting this situation."
Then this needs to start IMMEDIATELY!
Pro-Life/Catholic ping for you lists
I’d like to hear the pope say this.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
Excellent! I hope this does begin, starting with Biden, Pelosi, and De Lauro (the woman who was behind that offensive letter just sent to the Pope by a bunch of our congress creeps).
If you thought they were upset about the SSPX, wait till this happens.
And if they don’t, they are actively encouraging others to sin, thus risking their own chance at salvation. Nobody said it was supposed to be easy to beethe bishop.
You just did. You just didn't see his lips move.
Exactly, Archbishop Burke would not be saying this without the full support of the Pope.
>>Archbishop Burke called “nonsense” the accusation, regularly made by some bishops, that refusing Holy Communion “makes the Communion rail a [political] battle ground”. In fact, he said, the precise opposite is true. The politician who insists on being seen receiving Holy Communion, despite his opposition to the Church’s central teachings, is using that reception for political leverage. <<
Please forward to Bishop of Wilmington, DE. He refuses to use the Eucharist as a political tool. So Biden is welcome, abortion and all.
What about all the non-politician Catholics who voted for Obama? What about them?
They need to have a very public press conference, read all the names of the scum-bag politicians that believe in killing unborns and newly born babies, and EXCOMMUNICATE THEM in the most vocal way possible.
And THEN deny them the sacraments . . . PUBLICLY AND WITH FANFARE!
I think that’s more of a gray area because the voters are not voting on abortion per se.
Quite right. I know.
However, it would carry much more weight if the Holy Father said it himself.
That would be a stunner.
It wouldn't surprise me if he did in the near future.
Yeah, all the voting democrats who are Catholic and approach for communion, what about them? They put all these pro-death politicians in power. Since the dem voting Catholics obviously separate politics from religion, they will continue to take communion and continue to vote in pro-death candidates. Of course they see nothing wrong with voting for abortionists while parading around as Catholics. Not to pick on Catholics though, plenty of other denominations that are supposedly Christian have lots of dem voters taking communion too. sigh. They don’t get it. They won’t until they meet their Maker.
Excatly, Dennis. Amen.
Well, I hear what you’re saying but how could you realisticly deny communion to BHO voters and pro-abortion Catholics who are private citizens? During communion have the priest say, “Those of you who voted for John McCain please come foward and receive holy communion. Those of you who voted for BHO please remain seated.”
I have nothing but contempt for practicing Catholics who vote Democrat and are pro-abortion. But I don’t see how you could deny private citizens communion. It would mean they would have to publicly declare what they did in the privacy of a voting booth and it would violate the concept of a secret ballot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.