Posted on 02/05/2009 4:16:04 AM PST by Loyalist
A Halifax man fears a judge will send his three teenage children back to live with their mother, a dominatrix who admits to dressing her teenage daughter in bondage gear and posing for photos with her in a sex dungeon.
The daughter, then 15, posted the photos, which include a shot of her wearing a dog collar and leash held by her mom, on the Internet last June.
When the father saw those, he called child protection workers, who alerted Halifax Regional Police.
On the advice of a child welfare worker, all three teens moved out of the home. The kids were allowed to return to their mother in July but authorities seized them again in November when it came to light that the same teenage girl was working as a makeup artist for pornographic photo and film shoots in their apartment building.
(Excerpt) Read more at thechronicleherald.ca ...
Second, this woman should not be allowed within a mile of her children.
Third, if this woman has been involving her daughter in this sort of activity, then what else has she been subjecting her daughter to?
Fourth, is this what is meant when liberals speak about being "sex-positive"?
I think this is what’s known as an “open and shut case.”
and he’s just finding this out now?
The sex-positive movement is a loosely defined term that applies to a wide variety of elements that embrace social and philosophical attitudes promoting open sexuality with few limits.---wikipedia
I guess pimping out your own 15 year old fits in there somewhere.
I wonder if Halifax will let Homos adopt those children. Sick. :0(
From my reading it, he found out at least 8 months ago, immediately informed the authorities, and has been fighting to keep the kids out of her custody since then.
I dont know this family’s history, but there is a lot to be read between the lines.
Did he leave the mother because he did not want to be her Dom slave? He had to know where her preferences laid. He doesnt want his kids brought up by the mother , but he dosnt want cistody. The 16 year old is already too far into this thing to be saved. At 18 she will be making her own movies, if she isnt now.
The father is a bit late coming into this now his mistake stared at least 16 years ago.
True, but for all we know, Mom discovered her new lifestyle after the divorce. I’d think if the father knew it’d come up in the custody hearing. And even if it did, divorces can be mighty contentious, and the Court may have assumed he and she were making things up and exaggerating stories. Frankly, the kids should end up in Dad’s hands, but may not.
First of all. Do not judge on what you yourself know nothing about. Do you know the kids, the mom, the dad, the situation? Didnt think so. Therefore, how can you be sure that your motor mouth opinions are in the best interest of the kids. just because you head “sex kids adult 15”... immediately means its true and therefore punishable by removal from the mother?
Second of all... If ALL of you readers who so eagerly wish the kids “the best thing for them” to be removed from the mother and given to the father... prove to me this.
Prove to me that you never swore infront of your kids. That your first born was NOT in the house while you “made” their baby brother or sister. That there was NEVER anything provocative on TV while your children were in the room or in THEIR room which could still audable hear the sounds/words coming from the television. That the kids are 100% certain of never hearing, seeing, reading or being exposed to this while outside of the mothers AND fathers care. (EX: schools, playgrounds, buses, movies, friends house etc).
Do not jump to conclusions, because if you were in the same situation would you want to be the subject of the Front Page news... and reading about people comments THEY KNOW NOTHING about?
“That your first born was NOT in the house while you “made” their baby brother or sister.”
I am fairly certain that my first born was indeed in the house when my wife and I conceived his little brother and sister.
What’s your point?
There is a difference between doing things in a house with children, doing things in front of the chlidren, and involving the children in things. There is clear evidence in this article that the mother was not only doing things in the home but doint them in front of the children and even involving the children (please read the article). Or don’t you see any difference between parents having sex in the house with a child, parents having sex in front of the children, and parents involving their children in their sex? Are you really arguing that they are all the same because for your analogy to make any sense, that’s exactly what you’d need to believe.
8 months ago....hard to believe. IMO
The article suggests tha the father isn’t looking for custodoy of the children. Whether she came to this behavior when she was with the father or after is irrelevant. What’s relevant is that the father understands that the environment she’s providing for her children is not suitable for children, a conclusion that even a disinterested stranger could come to if the facts presented in the article are true.
Hey, check your meds, stat!
You signed up today just to spit this out?
Oops, too late.
In after the zot.
It’s clear a line was crossed with the photo shoot of the 15-year-old.
Oh, welcome to FR, BTW.
I wonder if that was a Slave or Domme?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.