Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cold warrior Henry Kissinger woos Russia for Barack Obama
The Telegraph ^ | 2/6/2009 | Adrian Blomfield, Moscow

Posted on 02/05/2009 5:52:41 PM PST by bruinbirdman

Henry Kissinger, the pioneer of Cold War detente during the Nixon era, has made a return to frontline politics after President Barack Obama reportedly sent him to Moscow to win backing from Vladimir Putin's government for a nuclear disarmament initiative.

The Daily Telegraph has learned that the 85-year-old former US secretary of state met President Dmitry Medvedev for secret negotiations in December. According to Western diplomats, during two days of talks the octogenarian courted Russian officials to win their support for Mr Obama's initiative, which could see Russia and the United States each slashing their nuclear warheads to 1,000 warheads.

The decision to send Mr Kissinger to Moscow, taken by Mr Obama when he was still president-elect, is part of a plan to overcome probable Republican objections in Congress.

Mr Kissinger is believed to have won a verbal rather than written undertaking for the deal. Tom Graham, a senior associate at Kissinger Associates and a former member of the national security council in the White House, on Thursday confirmed that Mr Kissinger had met Mr Medvedev but denied that any negotiations had taken place and said he had not met with Mr Putin.

However, a diplomatic source said that Mr Kissinger held two days of talks with Mr Putin at his country house near Moscow.

While the details of the ambitious initiative are yet to be revealed, the proposal to return to the negotiating table after eight years of reluctance in Washington has been welcomed in Britain and elsewhere.

Mr Obama apparently chose Mr Kissinger for his consummate diplomatic skills and his popularity in Moscow, an affection earned by his open acknowledgment of Russia's international resurgence.

Despite his pariah status with many of Left-wingers in Mr Obama's Democratic Party, the president forged relations with Mr Kissinger during his campaign.....

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhorussia; coldwar2; kissinger; putin; russia; saltiv; sovietunion
While Henry (unconfirmed by the Senate) is conducting foreign policy for Hussein in Russia and Toni Blair is reporting to The One on the Middle East, what is Sec State Mrs. Clinton up to? Oh yes, she is paying her respects to Japan.
1 posted on 02/05/2009 5:52:41 PM PST by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

More like New World Order Warrior or Bilderberger Stooge.


2 posted on 02/05/2009 6:00:53 PM PST by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC & Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
More like New World Order Warrior or Bilderberger Stooge.

How is this old dude still going? He won't go away!

3 posted on 02/05/2009 6:03:31 PM PST by GinaLolaB (=^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Forget about Russia, they had better be worrying about the Red Chinese and their growing arsenal. With over a billion people, with plenty to spare, they’ve certainly got the cajones to use their nukes if and when the time comes.


4 posted on 02/05/2009 6:14:45 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Do a google: Kissinger "New World Order"

Do it both on the web and news. If you don't already know what's going on these days, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out.

5 posted on 02/05/2009 6:22:48 PM PST by inpajamas (Modern progressive liberalism is merely fascism without balls - http://skarbutts.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Don’t forget nobody dude. When it comes to us, they are all together.


6 posted on 02/05/2009 6:25:57 PM PST by inpajamas (Modern progressive liberalism is merely fascism without balls - http://skarbutts.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Russia is not going to give anything away. We will be disarming for naught.


7 posted on 02/05/2009 6:32:22 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inpajamas
The Russians and Chinese are long-time mortal enemies, and as soon as one or the other wiped us out, they would turn on each other. Nixon played on this when he "opened" China and stuck it to Brezhnev.

With that said, the Russians have always been mostly bluster, and plus most of their strategic missiles probably aren't operational anyway because of the corrosive liquid fuels that they have always used.

The Chinese, on the other hand, are building a modern stockpile of solid-fuel ICBMs, with the latest in warhead technology, courtesy of Bill Clinton. They are far more ruthless and dangerous than the Russians could ever be.

Gromyko Says Mao Wanted Soviet A-Bomb Used on G.I.'s

8 posted on 02/05/2009 6:43:55 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Wonder how well Obama and Hilary are going to take Jimmy Carter’s meddling diplomatic excursions? It’s just a matter of time before the self-styled statesman heads off on a diplomatic “mission” to pursue his own foreign policy objectives. He’s done it to all of the presidents who followed him.


9 posted on 02/05/2009 7:06:30 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
"Forget about Russia, they had better be worrying about the Red Chinese and their growing arsenal."

OK. After Mrs. Clinton finishes with the Japanese and Koreans she is going to pop in on the ChiComs. I hear they are interested in aircraft carriers.

yitbos

10 posted on 02/05/2009 7:32:01 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I am so unsurprised, I can barely contain my yawn.

NWO retread #666 & counting. Every time the Obamination says something, you can see Soros’ lips moving.


11 posted on 02/05/2009 9:43:51 PM PST by CowboyJay (Stop picking on Porkulus. He's not fat, he's just big-boned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; Jeff Head
I hear they are interested in aircraft carriers.

Oh yeah, they most certainly are...

Ask my FRiend Jeff about the Red Chinese naval build-up.

12 posted on 02/06/2009 3:31:32 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
The Russians and Chinese are long-time mortal enemies, and as soon as one or the other wiped us out, they would turn on each other.

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
_____________________________________________________________

War Games: Russia, China Grow Alliance
September 23, 2005

In foreign policy it’s critical to “know thine enemy.” So American policymakers should be aware that Russia and China are inching closer to identifying a common enemy — the United States.

The two would-be superpowers held unprecedented joint military exercises Aug. 18-25. Soothingly named “Peace Mission 2005,” the drills took place on the Shandong peninsula on the Yellow Sea, and included nearly 10,000 troops. Russian long-range bombers, the army, navy, air force, marine, airborne and logistics units from both countries were also involved.

Moscow and Beijing claim the maneuvers were aimed at combating terrorism, extremism and separatism (the last a veiled reference to Taiwan), but it’s clear they were an attempt to counter-balance American military might.

Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants. As the Pravda.ru Web site announced, “the reconciliation between China and Russia has been driven in part by mutual unease at U.S. power and a fear of Islamic extremism in Central Asia.”
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Commentary/ed092605a.cfm
_____________________________________________________________

Russia, China flex muscles in joint war games
Reuters: Aug 17, 2007

CHEBARKUL, Russia (Reuters) - Russia and China staged their biggest joint exercises on Friday but denied this show of military prowess could lead to the formation of a counterweight to NATO.

"Today's exercises are another step towards strengthening the relations between our countries, a step towards strengthening international peace and security, and first and foremost, the security of our peoples," Putin said.

Fighter jets swooped overhead, commandos jumped from helicopters on to rooftops and the boom of artillery shells shook the firing range in Russia's Ural mountains as two of the largest armies in the world were put through their paces.

The exercises take place against a backdrop of mounting rivalry between the West, and Russia and China for influence over Central Asia, a strategic region that has huge oil, gas and mineral resources.

Russia's growing assertiveness is also causing jitters in the West. Putin announced at the firing range that Russia was resuming Soviet-era sorties by its strategic bomber aircraft near NATO airspace.
http://in.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idINIndia-29030120070817?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

13 posted on 02/18/2009 8:42:26 AM PST by ETL (Smoking gun evidence on ALL the ObamaRat-commie connections at my newly revised FR Home/About page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson