Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty (Paging General Robert E. Lee)
wnd ^ | 2/6/09 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 02/07/2009 3:24:06 AM PST by Evil Slayer

NEW YORK – As the Obama administration attempts to push through Congress a nearly $1 trillion deficit spending plan that is weighted heavily toward advancing typically Democratic-supported social welfare programs, a rebellion against the growing dominance of federal control is beginning to spread at the state level.

So far, eight states have introduced resolutions declaring state sovereignty under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, including Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

Analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania.

"What we are trying to do is to get the U.S. Congress out of the state's business," Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon told WND.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: Arkansas; US: Georgia; US: Hawaii; US: Idaho; US: Indiana; US: Kansas; US: Michigan; US: Missouri; US: Montana; US: New Hampshire; US: Oklahoma; US: Pennsylvania; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; bho2009; constitution; cwii; democratcongress; democrats; economy; lp; lping; mo; neomarxism; nh; obama; ok; porkulus; secede; socialistagenda; sovereignty; statesovereignty; statesrights; stimulus; wa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last
The time has come to "form a more perfect union" by states rights. The battle of the states has begun. History is in the making once again.
1 posted on 02/07/2009 3:24:06 AM PST by Evil Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

WOOHOO!! Pennsylvania is on the list! Color me surprised!


2 posted on 02/07/2009 3:26:10 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Meanwhile, they are all clamoring for their own teat to draw from under the great Porkulus Maximus!


3 posted on 02/07/2009 3:28:07 AM PST by Obamageddon (Birth certificate and college transcripts will be required for Federal employment, Mr. Soetero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Florida FReepers, call, write and email our RINO about this. If PA can get on the list, we should have no problem twisting that skinny gov of ours arm to do so. FREEDOM!!!!!


4 posted on 02/07/2009 3:28:42 AM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

ping

NICE ! GO AHEAD FOR FREEDOM USA


5 posted on 02/07/2009 3:30:37 AM PST by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
Rendell will sign on for anything that makes his union thug state really HIS state.
6 posted on 02/07/2009 3:31:28 AM PST by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

New Hampshire, overrun with Massholes and increasingly subject to voter fraud, will not adopt this resolution. The Governor and legislature completely support — with hands out — the Big Spender on Pennsylvania Avenue.


7 posted on 02/07/2009 3:32:42 AM PST by wizwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Definitely time to regain the rights of the states.


8 posted on 02/07/2009 3:34:49 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
There are two different forces within each state - the independence forces and the socialist collaborators.

What we are probably going to see is a dominance of the independence forces in a number of states who are going to shout down the communists in their states.

9 posted on 02/07/2009 3:35:43 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

I’m with you!


10 posted on 02/07/2009 3:37:31 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Important ping


11 posted on 02/07/2009 3:38:48 AM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

I will contact my state rep TODAY and try to add tiny Delaware. Now THAT would be a slap in the face.


12 posted on 02/07/2009 3:44:56 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
thank your state representatives who voted for this measure.

House Careers | Senate Employment Bulletin
CIA Careers | GOP Jobs
 
2010 Primaries Begin Now.
AK  AL  AR  AZ  CA  CO  CT  DE  FL  GA  HI  IA  ID  IL  IN  KS  KY  LA 
MA  MD  ME  MI  MN  MO  MS  MT  NC  ND  NE  NH  NJ  NM  NV  NY 
OH  OK  OR  PA  RI  SC  SD  TN  TX  UT  VA  VT  WA  WI  WV  WY
Contact: Senator, Representative

13 posted on 02/07/2009 3:48:37 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

This amendment sounds good on its face, but thanks to things like stretching the Interstate Commerce Clause to include anything our Congress wants it’s become meaningless. I’m generally not in favor of adding new amendments - but maybe we need one to restrict the Commerce Clause.


14 posted on 02/07/2009 3:53:26 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
We can't be blamed for wondering if there is any sanity left among elected officials anywhere in the United States. This is a welcome article. The Peoples Republic of Minnesota is conspicuous in absence from the list.
15 posted on 02/07/2009 3:57:08 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

Illinois is not. Nothing unexpected.


16 posted on 02/07/2009 3:58:42 AM PST by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

My State of Michighanistan is on it too.


17 posted on 02/07/2009 4:00:39 AM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

I will be contacting my State Houses and pushing for immediate consideration of such a bill, and with a lot of the emphasis put on holding the Feds to the 9th and 10th amendments, I don’t see where they would oppose it...


18 posted on 02/07/2009 4:01:10 AM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obamageddon

Meanwhile, they are all clamoring for their own teat to draw from under the great Porkulus Maximus!

Agreed! Anyone that thinks any state is going to be able to withstand the federal highway and medical payment blackmail among others, is living in a dream world.

Oh how I would love to be proved wrong. It has already been postulated in this forum, how red states need to band together in defense of the American way of life, before it is too late.

Texas, Alaska, Wyoming, and South Dakota, need to be at the forefront of the battle. The other nineteen states mentioned would be gravy. I suspect however, that CA and HI are definately a bridge too far. There are other far more conservative states,


19 posted on 02/07/2009 4:04:14 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Reference Post

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2178623/posts?page=100#70

20 posted on 02/07/2009 4:04:42 AM PST by EBH ( Directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6; PennsylvaniaMom; stimpy17; Gosh I love this neighborhood; GregB; ...

For those of you from Pa:

Ping!


21 posted on 02/07/2009 4:07:01 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

IMHO only the first ten had much meaning. The rest of them have been nothing but trouble. Again, IMHO.


22 posted on 02/07/2009 4:07:56 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
“As the Obama administration attempts to push through Congress a nearly $1 trillion deficit spending plan that is weighted heavily toward advancing typically Democratic-supported social welfare programs, a rebellion against the growing dominance of federal control is beginning to spread at the state level...Analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including... Maine and Pennsylvania.”

And it was the two Republican Senators from Maine and the Republican Senator from Pennsylvania that went over to the dark side and voted FOR this pork bill that gave the Dims the 60 votes it needed.

23 posted on 02/07/2009 4:09:24 AM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer
A waste of time. Federal Courts would just declare the new amendment unconstitutional.
24 posted on 02/07/2009 4:10:10 AM PST by Vet_6780 ("I see debt people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Sent the letter below to my FL rep Adam Fetterman (D) district 81

Dear Rep. Fetterman,

I am taking a moment to write you about the troubling economic situation, and how these times can cause us to lose sight of the fundamentals our nation was based on. Our Founding Fathers had been oppressed by their government, and knew without a doubt, that by throwing off the shackles of tyranny was the only way for their children, countrymen and themselves to prosper. A very small group of very brave men took it upon themselves to join together and declare their independence from this tax happy monarchy and laid down their signatures and then their very lives for this cause.

It has now become self evident to another group of brave citizens that this course must again be undertaken. While watching in horror, the largest spending bill in history being forced upon a populace by a small band of theives in Washington, not representing their constituents views, and rewarding various groups for their loyalty during elections, it is obvious to all but the most blind that we cannot borrow our way out of debt. The bill put forth is 48% tax cuts and 52% spending with absolutely no mention of spending cuts for the government except to cut our military budget by 10% at a time when we are fighting a war on 2 fronts, and our sons and daughters are in harms way! Instead, government is planning to fund abortion, STD prevention, and honeybee studies, among billions of more in “the PORKULOUS bill” or as Sntr Corker put it, the biggest generational theft bill of all time. Think about that, generational theft. You have children, as do I, and we are stealing their opportunity to have the same life our parents did, because we don’t want to face our debt problem.

Our Founding fathers have said many things about passing debt on to future generations, about entitlement spending, taxing the people, and big government. There is way too much over reaching in all these areas today. Please read Jefferson, Davey Crockett, Franklin, Washington and the Federalist papers. We are succumbing to the very things they warned of. Re read, with fresh eyes, the declaration of independence, and most importantly, the Constitution of the United States. See with the eyes of our Fathers what they were trying to protect us from.

While I know you personally are not involved in federal negotiations on this bill, our Governor is supporting this bill. This will NOT stand with Floridians. We are hurting for sure, my husband has been unemployed for 4 months now. I have not asked for food stamps, mortgage reductions, welfare, or any other entitlement spending on our behalf. I ask you to NOT put my children further into debt on our behalf. It was our irresponsibility looking for easy credit, instant gratification, keeping up with the Joneses, and not planning well for the future. I do not want to burden them with our generations greed.

20 states have put forth bills reaffirming the rights of their states. Why all of a sudden do you think this is happening? It is because so many constituents feel their rights and liberties slipping away, that drastic measures to protect the sovereignty of the state is necessary. I urge you, and your fellow representatives, to put up a similar bill in our state. While being part of the Union is important, it does NOT supersede the right to be a sovereign state. Our rights are being eroded as union members, whether abuses of the 2nd amendment, abortion, ILLEGAL immigration, religious freedom,gay marriage, and taxation without representation. I hope you will consider truly representing us in the state of Florida by putting forth such a message to Washington on behalf of the people in Florida.

Thank you for your time,


25 posted on 02/07/2009 4:10:29 AM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizwor

“Massholes”

LOL

Thank you!!


26 posted on 02/07/2009 4:12:38 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

There are a number of states, mostly Western ones like AZ, MT, ND, etc, who have recently asserted their right to secede in certain circumstances. I believe AZ has stated they will automatically secede if the Constitution is ever suspended due to martial law AND a certain number of states trigger similar clauses.

Secession is not likely, but it is interesting that several states are publicly and legally asserting themselves. What is left unsaid in the article is one possible reason for this. Massive immigration and racial politics are only going to get worse. The federal government will keep mandating laws and programs that will bankrupt state budgets. Does a state like Idaho really need to follow the same laws and institute the same programs as Maryland? A state like MD must tailor its legislation in areas like welfare and gun control specifically to racial and cultural realities - its voters demand that it does. When the Democratic Party controls the federal government, that same thinking gets turned into federal law and spending packages.

This is only going to intensify. Once there begins a sizable demographic shift of whites moving West, the dissolution of the union will follow. This could take 20 to 50 years and is not inevitable, but it is certainly possible.


27 posted on 02/07/2009 4:13:20 AM PST by Cap74 (God is a Republican, Santa Claus is a Democrat -P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

letter sent to Fetterman, post # 25. Spread the word!


28 posted on 02/07/2009 4:13:46 AM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Humal

Pennsylvania may have gone blue in the presidential election, but, in the flyover counties between philly and pittsburgh, we are RED - with the exception of Murtha’s district, Erie and Scranton. Our state has the largest population of gun owners and hunters in the country. We have solid conservative representatives from the red counties in Pa. It’s from those red counties that I’ll bet this was brought forth.

It’s the Philly and Pittsburgh RATS that keep getting Sphincter elected. Don’t judge us all by them. We have to work harder to get him out next time - and no GW Bush to campaign for him!


29 posted on 02/07/2009 4:20:07 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
I’m generally not in favor of adding new amendments - but maybe we need one to restrict the Commerce Clause.

Nope, we just need to beat the feds over the head with original intent:

This principle is, if possible, still more clear, when applied to commerce "among the several States." They either join each other, in which case they are separated by a mathematical line, or they are remote from each other, in which case other States lie between them. What is commerce "among" them; and how is it to be conducted? Can a trading expedition between two adjoining States, commence and terminate outside of each? And if the trading intercourse be between two States remote from each other, must it not commence in one, terminate in the other, and probably pass through a third? Commerce among the States must, of necessity, be commerce with the States.
Gibbons v. Ogden Chief Justice Marshall

Commerce among the several States means the ENTITIES of the States, or State governments. For instance; if Hawaii and Iowa wanted to trade pineapples for corn, the federal government would arbitrate the exchange to insure it was equitable.

30 posted on 02/07/2009 4:21:10 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am not a political, public, collective, corporate, administrative or legal entity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
"WOOHOO!! Pennsylvania is on the list! Color me surprised!"

I'm surprised too. I called my state senator and representative a couple of days ago to urge support of this initiative, and none of the staffers had ever heard of the idea. Senator Greenleaf's staff requested information, which I forwarded. No response yet.

31 posted on 02/07/2009 4:21:35 AM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Think free or die

I’ll have to get on the stick and call as well!


32 posted on 02/07/2009 4:23:38 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

The names of the three traitors, need to be shouted from the house tops until they are considered to be just what they are, and run out of office. The next battle will be even tougher as the bill goes back to the house.

With Obama bleating incessantly about a perceived crisis, and the house dems crying over spilt pork, how many of the brave Republicans will be able to hold the line when this bill hits the conference committee?

The noise from the American people will have to be four times what it was for the senate review of the bill, and even then we won’t be heard, because of the herd mentality. We are about to find out just how much the people are going to stand.


33 posted on 02/07/2009 4:30:35 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Congress can apparently stretch any statement to cover any cause they see fit. Maybe the problem is with the politicians? Maybe we should go back to the Citizen Civil Servant as first required? I don’t think that the office of any State or Federal Representative or Senator should be a paid position, nor should any politician get a lifetime pension for serving for as little as two years. After all, these bums work FOR us not against us as they appear to be doing currently with this non-stimulating pork roast of a bill.


34 posted on 02/07/2009 4:31:27 AM PST by junkman_106 (The ACLU can go have aerial intercourse with a revolving glazed pastry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Years ago, someone at National Review proposed an amendment to the Constitution, reading: “The Ninth and Tenth Amendments to this Constitution are to be observed.”


35 posted on 02/07/2009 4:34:59 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

“The time has come to “form a more perfect union” by states rights. The battle of the states has begun. History is in the making once again”

At some point it seemed to be accepted that the federal government was more reasoned and responsible than the state governments ... that is a falsehood. It is time for a political revival, which will necessitate a spiritual one, to strive for that “shining city upon a hill” that Pres. Reagan foresaw. I can think of no greater shame than not preserving the freedoms that we were so selflessly given, so the next generation can also enjoy them.


36 posted on 02/07/2009 4:35:10 AM PST by Peter Horry (Never were abilities so much below mediocrity so well rewarded - John Randolph)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

Saw a color coded map recently that depicted red and blue by county...the blue portions were only in large city areas where populations could be easily controlled and directed to vote. Strange.


37 posted on 02/07/2009 4:36:45 AM PST by junkman_106 (The ACLU can go have aerial intercourse with a revolving glazed pastry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

the adolescent, psychotic punks in congress are going to have to learn that they promised to uphold the constitution of the united states and not the communist manifesto.

(tyranny is just another word for liberal democrats.)

IMHO


38 posted on 02/07/2009 4:37:41 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry
"I can think of no greater shame than not preserving the freedoms that we were so selflessly given, so the next generation can also enjoy them."

Couldn't agree more Pete.

39 posted on 02/07/2009 4:38:34 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

Speaking of the Fourth Amendment:

Why is it a violation of the Fourth Amendment that cries to heaven for vengeance, if the CIA, FBI, or NSA listens to the telephone call of a non-citizen who is a terrorist,

but NOT a violation of the Fourth Amendment if the government grabs my COMPLETE MEDICAL HISTORY, and scans and digitizes it, and uses it to take control of my medical care?


40 posted on 02/07/2009 4:42:06 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap74
"A state like MD must tailor its legislation in areas like welfare and gun control specifically to racial and cultural realities".

Baloney, The Constitution must prevail. If you have a culture not suited to live by the law, change the culture, not The Constitution.

41 posted on 02/07/2009 4:44:27 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: junkman_106

Yep. And the union mentality in those cities is strong. Especially in Pittsburgh, Scranton and Johnstown. Philly is where Rendell is from. His thugs pretty much control that city.

My county includes the hometown of Jimmy Stewart. A strong conservative republican. We are still very conservative - even with a 15,000 student state university in our midst.


42 posted on 02/07/2009 4:45:02 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

I agree - but which has changed in reality?


43 posted on 02/07/2009 4:47:04 AM PST by Cap74 (God is a Republican, Santa Claus is a Democrat -P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

PING


44 posted on 02/07/2009 5:03:26 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama dozed.....people froze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizwor

Man, Hew Hampshire has really gone to the dogs since I lived there 15 years ago.

Back then it was the Buchanites vs. the McCainiacs, with a bit of big-L libertarianism thrown in. The Rat party was nearly invisible except in the Mass. border town of Nashua which even then was showing a big illegal aliens problem.

It’s astonishing that the Massholes have taken charge in such a short period of time.

What happened?


45 posted on 02/07/2009 5:04:14 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

“Socialism Is Legal Plunder” / “Legal Plunder Has Many Names”

You would use the law to oppose socialism? But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.

Thus we have an infinite number of plans for organizing it: tariffs, protection, benefits, subsidies, encouragements, progressive taxation, public schools, guaranteed jobs, guaranteed profits, minimum wages, a right to relief, a right to the tools of labor, free credit, and so on, and so on. All these plans as a whole — with their common aim of legal plunder — constitute socialism.

http://bastiat.org/en/the_law.html#SECTION_G1809

Thanks to FReeper raygun for the link.

What? The laboratories of socialism are finally waking up to the jack-booted thugs of socialism? Where the heck have they been?

Enabling it. Condoning it. Participating in it. That’s where.


46 posted on 02/07/2009 5:07:50 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

None of this will mean anything once the “Stimulus” hand-outs start.


47 posted on 02/07/2009 5:14:13 AM PST by Roccus (I am a RINO...............I am a Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obamageddon

Exactly! If the states was sovereignty, then why are they asking for bailout money?

I thought I heard that the aggregate state cry was about $150 billion.

Can’t have it both ways.

— Jane Reinheimer


48 posted on 02/07/2009 5:23:38 AM PST by quintr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

great letter! thanks for sending it, especially on behalf of this other Floridian.

God Bless.

Sarah


49 posted on 02/07/2009 5:32:22 AM PST by spacejunkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Essentially, the Massholes invaded. They come to our communities to avoid the burden of Taxachusetts then immediately start clamoring for services. Worse, political operatives from the Commonwealth interfere with our elections. In cities, there are nearly as many Massachusetts plates as New Hampshire on election day. Their interference has now been elevated to fraud as Massholes attending our colleges and owning vacation property cross the border to vote (Massachusetts has long been a one party state). In my small town, 40% more people voted in the Presidential primary and election than the EVER vote in local elections. How can people be more interested in presidential politics than property taxes and schools? They do not pay the taxes and they do not attend the schools. Not sure we can get a url like this posted, but take a look at this article http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=58c8d2f7-bd05-421b-8c5d-53c87d71d07a


50 posted on 02/07/2009 5:33:36 AM PST by wizwor (webmaster danvilledelivery.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson