Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teens, Nude Photos and the Law
Newsweek ^ | February 14, 2009

Posted on 02/17/2009 4:22:46 PM PST by NCjim

Ask yourself: should the police be involved when tipsy teen girls e-mail their boyfriends naughty Valentine's Day pictures?

Say you're a middle-school principal who confiscated a cell phone from a 14-year-old boy, only to discover it contains a nude photo of his 13-year-old girlfriend. Do you (a) call the boy's parents in despair; (b) call the girl's parents in despair; or (c) call the police? More and more, the answer is (d) all of the above. Which could result in criminal charges for both of your students, and their eventual designation as sex offenders. "Sexting" is the clever new name for the act of sending, receiving or forwarding naked photos via your cell phone, and I wasn't fully convinced that America was facing a sexting epidemic, as opposed to a journalists-writing-about-sexting epidemic, until I saw a new survey done by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. One teenager in five reported having sent or posted naked photos of themselves. Whether all this reflects a new child-porn epidemic, or just a new iteration of the old teen narcissism epidemic, remains unclear.

Last month, three girls (ages 14 or 15) in Greensburg, Pa., were charged with disseminating child pornography for sexting their boyfriends. The boys who received the images were charged with possession. A teenager in Indiana faces felony obscenity charges for sending a picture of his genitals to female classmates. A 15-year-old girl in Ohio and a 14-year-old girl in Michigan were charged with felonies for sending nude images of themselves to classmates. Some of these teens have pleaded guilty to lesser charges. Others have not. If convicted, these young people may have to register as sex offenders, in some cases for a decade or two.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: NCjim

How the he** can it be against the law to send nude photos of yourself, even if you are an under aged teenage girl? This just borders on the ridiculous and shows how far down we have fallen. Felony charges against these kids for doing something that they have probably done in private already, show their bodies to their boyfriends and girlfriends. Sounds like the problem of the parents and none of the business of the frickin’ school or any other government agency. All of these kids are under age, so where’s the crime? An adult receiving kiddy porn? Nope. An adult sending nude photos of his/her self? Nope. No crime, just BS government interference in parents business.


41 posted on 02/17/2009 4:56:11 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Before Clinton Oral sex was sex. Most kids didnt do it. Didnt know about it in fatc, but Bubba clued tham in and it’s been down hill ever since , with prayer out of school and sex educations classes in.

Keep telling yourself that. I almost choked on a chip thanks to the absurdity of this statement.
42 posted on 02/17/2009 4:57:35 PM PST by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Well, the schools treat the kids like property and they always have. I had my own problems back in the day. I had long hair and rode a Harley for my senior year so that automatically made me a drug dealer and I was constantly getting screwed with. I parked my bike across the street at a friends house and that still didn't stop the school security freak from going over there and searching my saddle bags. When he did this again on a Friday night (off school property okay?) my friends and I jumped him and beat the hell out of him and then dared him to call the cops on us. He didn't. After THAT I got left alone.

So, yeah, I'm not a big fan of the schools messing around with kids and I am a HUGE advocate of home schooling and private schools and school vouchers.

43 posted on 02/17/2009 4:58:26 PM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MahatmaGandu

Jack goes quail hunting before school and then pulls into the school parking lot with his shotgun in his truck’s gun rack.

1959 - Vice Principal comes over, looks at Jack’s shotgun, goes to his car and gets his shotgun to show Jack.

2009 - School goes into lock down, FBI called, Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again. Counselors called in for traumatized students and teachers.


44 posted on 02/17/2009 4:59:49 PM PST by NCjim ("Lies have to be covered up, truth can run around naked." - Johnny Cash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Same here. All of us had knives from the time we could think about bringing them. Only got one taken one time, and the teacher gave it back after class and told me, in short, “I’m not saying don’t bring it, but don’t let anyone see it outside of this class.”


45 posted on 02/17/2009 4:59:58 PM PST by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

This happened in Augusta a couple months back...I’ll see if I can find the story.


46 posted on 02/17/2009 5:00:48 PM PST by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
Probably a high percentage of FReepers would be thrown in the klink today for the fooling around they did as teenagers.

Very, very true. We live in a very weird world of utter permissiveness and totalitarianism, often mixed in the same package.

47 posted on 02/17/2009 5:08:30 PM PST by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Found it! That didn't take long.

Wes Ivie, a 16-year-old junior and star lineman on the school's undefeated football team, had been serving an in-school suspension during his appeal. He must now attend the alternative school for the rest of the semester before returning to Evans High, according to a written summary of the board's Tuesday night decision.

The teen said he had forgotten that he'd left a hunting rifle in his vehicle after a weekend trip, according to both his mother, Anita Ivie, and a police report. When he saw police at the school conducting a random search Oct. 24 he reported the gun at the school office and was not charged.


His parents are furious and last I heard (through the grapevine, so may not be accurate) were considering homeschooling after this year and possibly getting a lawyer.
48 posted on 02/17/2009 5:08:37 PM PST by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I understand giving your kid a cell phone...

But why do these kids NEED camera phones or whatever they have that can kick these file around?

I blame the parents...and no, my kids have simple cell phones that they can talk on AND NOTHING MORE.


49 posted on 02/17/2009 5:10:02 PM PST by BobL (Drop a comment: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2180357/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Sorry to have inconvenienced you, Good luck with your daughters.


50 posted on 02/17/2009 5:11:06 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

The other day my husband and I were talking about drive by shootings. He said he never worried about them when he was in high school because the rednecks with rifles in their vehicles outnumbered the gangbangers at his school. BTW, this was less than twenty years ago.


51 posted on 02/17/2009 5:12:04 PM PST by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

I dont remember saying that, but if you believe it fine.

I suppose where you went to middle school it was prevalent.


52 posted on 02/17/2009 5:12:40 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

And I’m not disappointed. Putting people like this on the list dilutes and makes meaningless the point of the list.


53 posted on 02/17/2009 5:15:50 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Ever notice how “educators” can’t think their way out of a wet paper bag? If you call the police into a situation like this you make it a criminal matter. I don’t mean to minimize the situation, but jeeze! Call the parents into a conference, show them the evidence & leave the room. Let them figure it out!


54 posted on 02/17/2009 5:29:55 PM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
"Probably a high percentage of FReepers would be thrown in the klink today for the fooling around they did as teenagers."

You got that right. These people are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Sex offender status? Good grief, we are only talking nudity here.

Some teenage girl wants to entice her boyfriend. Like that hasn't been going on since the dawn of time. Anyone who is shocked by this has led a very sheltered life.

55 posted on 02/17/2009 5:31:43 PM PST by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Ever notice how “educators” can’t think their way out of a wet paper bag?

Yep. Those who can, do. And those who can't, teach.
56 posted on 02/17/2009 5:33:59 PM PST by arderkrag (Liberty Walking (www.geocities.com/arderkrag))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
13 year old girls didnt mail or even dream of having a nude picture taken when I was 13, and I knew a lot of them

Yep. All they did when I was a kid was play strip poker and streak through the boys locker room.

57 posted on 02/17/2009 5:40:32 PM PST by seowulf (Petraeus, cross the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Eventually sex offender registries are going to be meaningless when they're filled up with kids like these. Serial pedophiles and violent rapists are going to blend in easily on registries full of public urinators, johns and hookers, mooners, skinnydippers and now "sexters." Maybe that's the point.

See post #10. Hate is a powerful motivator.

58 posted on 02/17/2009 5:44:43 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
This is insanity. Probably a high percentage of FReepers would be thrown in the klink today for the fooling around they did as teenagers. Why can't people look at this stuff rationally?

Because there is a LOT of political mileage to be had in purveying this stuff, and nobody remembers who pushed it when it not only fails but is found to be counterproductive.

IMHO any politician who hangs his hat today on "being tough on sex offenders" has no real issues, much less solutions to same, on which to run. All he can do is pander, pander, pander.

I had hopes for Bobby Jindal, but he's falling way short. Some folks tell me he's a "big-government Republican" but I think that's a contradiction in terms.

59 posted on 02/17/2009 5:52:08 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Ever notice how “educators” can’t think their way out of a wet paper bag? If you call the police into a situation like this you make it a criminal matter. I don’t mean to minimize the situation, but jeeze! Call the parents into a conference, show them the evidence & leave the room. Let them figure it out!

Sadly, criminal liability taken the tool of discretion away from educators these days. Everything is "zero tolerance" and the educator that finds this stuff and fails to notify the authorities about "child pornography knowingly exchanged in the classroom" is putting their career and possibly their freedom on the line.

It has become easier to just call the cops and "CYA."

60 posted on 02/17/2009 5:58:35 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson