Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Buys Wearable Sniper Detectors
tfot ^ | 2/2/09 | tfot

Posted on 02/21/2009 6:56:52 AM PST by Flavius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: CodeToad
Only an idiot would think this cheesy device is going to protect them from snipers.

The best counter sniper system is another sniper. However, a number of sensor systems can be and are providing useful tools in dectecting, locating, and bringing effective fires on snipers.

Some of these technologies seemed hairbrained at first. Some of them proved to be just that. But, others have met the test of both time and combat. The jury is still out on this device. The Army's Rapid Equipping Force conducts in theater operational assessments on technologies like these. Some of them end up in the scrap heap, but others get adopted and deserve to be. I'm sure you haven't seen the data on this, but if you did you might change your mind. Acoustic sensors have come a long way in the last four years.

41 posted on 02/21/2009 5:49:13 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost
If the use of these devices means soldiers must carry more gear, I would wager it will cost lives in the long run. They are already burdened down with heavy, bulky gear that reduces their mobility and endurance.

Are you just stupid? I'd GLADLY trade an extra carried MRE for this thing to be able to pinpoint the badguy sniper throwing lead my way.

42 posted on 02/21/2009 5:59:48 PM PST by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“Thanks, if you have HBO, you might want to tune in to Taking Chance.”


I’ll catch it when the video reaches the library, but I do keep up with the reviews and it sounds very good.


43 posted on 02/21/2009 6:40:27 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Shows a great need for industrial design. Butt ugly.


44 posted on 02/21/2009 7:03:36 PM PST by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan

If it works does it matter


45 posted on 02/21/2009 7:11:19 PM PST by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

“I’m sure you haven’t seen the data on this, but if you did you might change your mind”

And you would be wrong. I have seen the acustics data of such devices. Signals processing is a thing I am an expert. I know the issues and these devices have issues. Alert, well trained troops far beat having yet another device they are told to rely on but will fail them.

The counter sniper devices that do work are the MMW systems. Those devices work because they detect the round from nearly the barrel to the target. They can not only trace where the round came from but its type as well.


46 posted on 02/21/2009 8:10:22 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberalism is Communism, and both are a mental disorder. Grow up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

” found to work in Afghanistan.”

I can make a ham sandwich seem to work, too. Data lies. Just because it worked to some degree does not mean the troops found it useful. Tried and true beats nifty and neat every time. Working in the engineering sector I’ve seen more crap thrown at the troops as the next greatest thing so some defense contractor whose paid off a Senator can make a few bucks when all the troops really want are basic things that work well.


47 posted on 02/21/2009 8:16:35 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberalism is Communism, and both are a mental disorder. Grow up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“And you would be wrong. I have seen the acustics data of such devices. Signals processing is a thing I am an expert.”


What is the truth about this specific 12oz.to 15oz. device, that this war time army is concealing by issuing it as ready for field use?


48 posted on 02/21/2009 8:21:07 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
"Are you stupid?"

Google the term "soldiers carry weight", then tell me that I'm stupid.

The results of the search will help to explain the weight aspect of my questioning of this new technologie's efficacy.

There are many, many tools, gadgets, etc that soldiers could carry that would protect them, but you'd need to be superman to carry them all.

49 posted on 02/21/2009 8:28:13 PM PST by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

“Just because it worked to some degree does not mean the troops found it useful.”


You sure are kind of vague, most of your protest seemed to be about politics and then money and then, that as a veteran, (sniper I guess)since you made a big deal about whether I was or not, that if we aren’t veterans we can’t know anything about this kind off thing, now you seem to be saying that although it worked some, the troops didn’t find it useful.

You keep telling us that you are an engineer and an expert but you don’t seem to know any details about this specific system that has hit the field, and then you go back to politics.

Just give us some facts about this specific unit.


50 posted on 02/21/2009 8:34:10 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

“Google the term “soldiers carry weight”, then tell me that I’m stupid.

The results of the search will help to explain the weight aspect of my questioning of this new technologie’s efficacy.”


My LRRP unit used to average about 130 lbs per pack and I’m sure everyone was disheartened to learn that in Desert Storm, Bravo 2 zeros LRRP mission packs started at 2009 lbs at the beginning of the mission (before caching).

What do you think that this anti sniper unit weighs (12 to 15ozs?) and it will primarily be worn in an urban environment which means patrols with lighter gear, vehicles, and garrisons close by.


51 posted on 02/21/2009 8:40:00 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

OK, maybe not 2009lbs, but 209lbs.


52 posted on 02/21/2009 8:41:14 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson