Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'No US Rights' For Bagram Inmates (Obama's Justice Dept: 600 Detainees Have No Constitutional Rights
BBC ^ | 2/21/2009 | Staff

Posted on 02/22/2009 11:58:30 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist

Detainees being held at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan cannot use US courts to challenge their detention, the US says.

The justice department ruled that some 600 so-called enemy combatants at Bagram have no constitutional rights.

Most have been arrested in Afghanistan on suspicion of waging a terrorist war against the US.

The move has disappointed human rights lawyers who had hoped the Obama administration would take a different line to that of George W. Bush.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; bagram; barackobama; bbc; bho2009; bho44; constitution; first100days; hopeychangey; justicedepartment; obama; obamatruthfile
I wonder how libs/Dems/the MSM will try to spin this in Obama's favor. If Bush were president, they would take a different line in commenting on or reporting this.

These detainees aren't going anywhere for quite some time. Plenty of time to tell America what the Obama administration is up to.

BTW, I personally don't believe that these 600 being detained at Bagram deserve constitutional rights.

1 posted on 02/22/2009 11:58:31 AM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

What say you?

Notice how the BBC reports this on Saturday?


2 posted on 02/22/2009 12:00:01 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist (Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I thought Obama said that he was going to bring “change”


3 posted on 02/22/2009 12:05:29 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist (Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Foreign news is now the news of choice by most Americans because while we may get biased information, at least we get information.
4 posted on 02/22/2009 12:11:56 PM PST by tobyhill (Obama gets no free pass from Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
I thought Obama said that he was going to bring “change”

He is. He's changing the socialist power grab in this country from covert to overt.

5 posted on 02/22/2009 12:13:06 PM PST by tbpiper (Coward, huh? Get your Marxist butt down here and say it to my face, Holder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The move has disappointed human rights lawyers who had hoped the Obama administration would take a different line to that of George W. Bush.

Do they mean the same "human rights lawyers" who were foaming-at-the-mouth raging mad at W for "depriving" people of their "rights", will now just grumble and accept it as "disappointing" when BO is pres?

6 posted on 02/22/2009 12:25:12 PM PST by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Agreed. The British press from the Telegraph onwards are the ones reporting the real news. The MSM are COMPLETELY in the tank for Dumbo.

I dont trust the BBC because they are ardent anti-US/Israel propagandists but it is surprising they even reported this.


7 posted on 02/22/2009 12:41:59 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The justice department ruled that some 600 so-called enemy combatants at Bagram have no constitutional rights.

HAHAHAHA!!!

The move has disappointed human rights lawyers who had hoped the Obama administration would take a different line to that of George W. Bush.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

FMCDH(BITS)

8 posted on 02/22/2009 1:19:28 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

bttt


9 posted on 02/22/2009 4:12:06 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I thought Constitutional rights were for U.S. Citizens only. How did the detainees get them?


10 posted on 02/22/2009 5:59:12 PM PST by redhead (Don't look at ME! I voted for SARAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson