Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Goldwater Lesson (stick to our principles)
The American Spectator ^ | February 24, 2009 | Jeffrey Lord

Posted on 02/24/2009 6:40:31 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative

"The Republicans have a simple choice. If they want to continue to define themselves as conservatives, they'll be defining themselves into oblivion. If they want to save themselves, they may have to create a third party of moderates."
-- Pollster John Zogby, November 16, 2008

"The Republican Party has paid a shatte ring price for the erratic deviation from our soundly moderate 20th century course. That ill-advised, badly-led swing to the extreme right has been decisively vetoed by the American voters, hundreds of thousands of Republicans among them."
-- Fred Young, NY GOP State Chair, November 5, 1964

"The undertakers are premature"
-- William F. Buckley, November 5, 1964


By now, the refrain insisting conservatism is a loser is, well, embarrassing.

To people like John Zogby.

Yet with the all-out assault of the Obama-ites on capitalism and the core tenets of a free market system, it is vital to remember the very relevant history of modern conservatives and liberals and just how we got here. It is important to look back to understand how to move forward.

The latest election of the day lost by Republicans is always said to be lost (as Mr. Zogby has done) because conservatives insisted on, well, conservatism. With the annual gathering of the Conservative Political Action Committee upon us, this year's gathering headlined by Rush Limbaugh, let's spend a moment documenting just how old and how very routine these anti-conservative diatribes are. Mr. Zogby is far from alone.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: barrygoldwater; conservatism; republicans; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2009 6:40:31 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Yea! John McCain was a booming success.


2 posted on 02/24/2009 6:42:36 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

a good portion of Republicans in congress don’t realise they are Republicans...they think they are Democraps....or Dhimmicrat lite.


3 posted on 02/24/2009 6:43:25 AM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I remember many pundits in 1980 stating that Reagan could not win as he was too conservative for the nation


4 posted on 02/24/2009 6:47:40 AM PST by lakertaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Pundits engage in hyperbole as a general rule, but has America fundamentally changed and moved away from Conservatism in the realms of finance, social issue, and national defense?

I’m not certain to be honest about it, Conservatism was mainstream American Thought, now in the GWB aftermath we are stuck with his hangover and will suffer the slings and arrows for it.


5 posted on 02/24/2009 6:48:17 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Zogby is an idiot. It was biased, corrupt media and corrupt Acorn vote rigging that lost the election, not ‘conservatism’.

Some of that blame also falls on RINO’S in the party that ALLOWED this media corruption to continue unchallenged for the past 8 years, as well as the vote rigging scams by Acorn.


6 posted on 02/24/2009 6:48:20 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

“”The Republican Party has paid a shatte ring price for the erratic deviation from our soundly moderate 20th century course. That ill-advised, badly-led swing to the extreme right has been decisively vetoed by the American voters, hundreds of thousands of Republicans among them.”
— Fred Young, NY GOP State Chair, November 5, 1964 “


It was this right wing “extremism” of Goldwater’s that made George and Mitt Romney storm out of the convention in public protest.


7 posted on 02/24/2009 6:53:45 AM PST by ansel12 ( Am I the only freeper that has been held in an American internment center?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Moderates cost us the Presidential election and also the last two congressional elections. George W. Bush governed as a lefty, government did nothing but grow under his watch.

If it’s true that the U.S. has become a custodial nation with a large minority population who only concerns themselves with getting a free ride from the government, then let’s go down with our principles or start considering secession.

Mob rule is a poor form of government and that’s what democracies are at their core. The left knows they can sway the stupid and dependent custodials of the democratic party - those guys care only that they’re going to get something for nothing - the future means nothing to them.

The principles of the republic may actually be lost. We’ve got an activist marxist as our president and no clear alternatives.

Maybe the U.S. is getting ready to break up into smaller countries and what’s wrong with that?


8 posted on 02/24/2009 6:58:35 AM PST by Professor_Leonide (I said to the young man who showed me a photo, "Who can ever be sure what is behind a mask?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

If only we could find people in the republican party who actually were conservatives and acted conservative. Instead we get Bushed, they tell us they are conservative, get elected then show their true self and sell us down the road to socialism.


9 posted on 02/24/2009 6:59:09 AM PST by stockpirate (A people unwilling to use violent force to preserve liberty deserve the tyrants that rule them. SP-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

We cheered when the Soviet Union disolved and 15 nations emerged. So, bigger isn’t always better. It’s usually the other way around.

Ask yourself these questions:

Isn’t a diamond more precious than a large hot air balloon?

Wouldn’t you rather drive in a small red Corvette or sit in a public bus?

Is a 1500 sq foot house in the country by a beautiful lake superior to a section 8 apartment building with 600 occupants (half of them felons)?

Would you rather have an 8 oz. rare steak from Ruth Cris or a three pound rump roast from a discount grocer?

Would you rather spend the night with a 115 lb Victoria’s Secret Model or with the 225 lb. Roseanne Barr?

Bigger isn’t always better. Bigger is usually worse.


10 posted on 02/24/2009 7:03:05 AM PST by Professor_Leonide (I said to the young man who showed me a photo, "Who can ever be sure what is behind a mask?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Before The Storm
"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And .....moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" GOLDWATER 1964 acceptance speech
11 posted on 02/24/2009 7:07:14 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (Sarah Palin "The Iron Lady of the North")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide
Bigger isn’t always better. Bigger is usually worse.

I can think of at least two exemptions.

12 posted on 02/24/2009 7:07:15 AM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
McGovern stuck to his principles as well. You have to redesign your message and to make it relevant to to each generation. We need a new mix and yes we need moderates too. We need to find new issues that will appeal to a majority of the people of this country as well as old ideas that work. And they need to express the values of the party and of its Base as well as moderates. Both the base and the swing voters are needed. We are not doing that but then again neither are the Dem's. As for the “rhino’s” they are needed but they need to be responsive to us as well. If not the people who are in the base (as on this board) will shut them out and that will be bad for all of us.
13 posted on 02/24/2009 7:07:28 AM PST by bilhosty (Welcome to Eat the Press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professor_Leonide

Good post. The GOP has run a moderate at least the last three Presidential elections. We are a worse party because of that.


14 posted on 02/24/2009 7:12:48 AM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty
McGovern stuck to his principles as well. You have to redesign your message and to make it relevant to to each generation.

In 1972, McGovern pulled in 46% of the 18 to 29 year old voters, while Nixon won 52% of those same 18 to 29 year olds.

15 posted on 02/24/2009 7:15:35 AM PST by ansel12 ( Am I the only freeper that has been held in an American internment center?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty
McGovern stuck to his principles as well. You have to redesign your message and to make it relevant to to each generation.

So did Stalin!

16 posted on 02/24/2009 7:24:21 AM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Some of that blame also falls on RINO’S in the party ...

The republican party needs to become more discriminating. Not everyone who shows up with an elephant on his lapel should be admitted. People running for office, especially at the national level, need to be colloquized into the party. Republican need to be conservative, in thought, word, and deed.

17 posted on 02/24/2009 7:30:31 AM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: padre35
....has America fundamentally changed and moved away from Conservatism in the realms of finance, social issue, and national defense? I’m not certain to be honest about it, Conservatism was mainstream American Thought

Conservatism has never been and will never be mainstream. Conservatism is a disciplined way of thinking and acting.

It's tough love.

Liberalism is the natural drift of society. Toward sloth and corruption. As Limbaugh has said repeatedly "liberalism is easy".

Conservatism is hard. Conservatism reemerges during tough times when liberalism fails us, as it always will. That's when we return to daddy.


18 posted on 02/24/2009 7:51:35 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (Sarah Palin "The Iron Lady of the North")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

Conservatives make up about 35% of the electorate. If yo throw everyone else out you have permanent minority status. The moderates should be welcomed but they need to find ways to become responsive. Just as conservatives need to understand that Philly suburbs and just about every major geographical area north and east off their simply will not accept down the line conservatives anymore. we will have to develop a conservative line of thought that reflects the needs and cultural predisposition of that area. And they will have to find way to be responsive to the rest of us and we to them. Their is just no other way.The strength of the Reagan coalition is that it included those persons.The weakness of the present party is that it does not. Part of it was because The Dem’s lost the independents and the moderates and we have now made the same mistake. you have to appeal to a majority their is just no other way. McCain was a perfect example of how not to run the party he was not a moderate he was just a backstabber who stabbed his own people in the back.

Giuliani for instance found ways to relate his views to the majority of the people where he lived. But, he was responsive to conservatives when he lowered the taxes and the cost of government banned porn in times square and yelled bloody murder about the “piss Christ”. He also went law and order and did something about Crime. he was also responsive to most of the people in NYC who were not conservatives and Republican’s. he actually ended up with more actual accomplishments on conservative principles then the idiots we have in congress. In most areas of the country he would not have to take so many lib positions.

So there is an example of how to make conservatives responsive instead of just turning over large Dem areas to the ‘crats.


19 posted on 02/24/2009 8:06:17 AM PST by bilhosty (Welcome to Eat the Press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty
You have to redesign your message and to make it relevant to to each generation. We need a new mix and yes we need moderates too. We need to find new issues that will appeal to a majority of the people of this country as well as old ideas that work.

No we don't. We are Conservatives first. The party is merely a vehicle to advance Conservative Principles. Because those principles work.

As Goldwater said "we need a choice not an echo".


20 posted on 02/24/2009 8:08:06 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (Sarah Palin "The Iron Lady of the North")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson