Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Banking (& 401k) Woes Grow, Debate Over Nationalization Intensifies
PBS ^ | 2/24/09

Posted on 02/25/2009 5:39:29 AM PST by Libloather

As Banking Woes Grow, Debate Over Nationalization Intensifies
Originally Aired: February 24, 2009

As turmoil continues in the U.S. banking industry, speculation is intensifying over whether the government should take larger ownership stakes in banks. Columnist Paul Krugman and former FDIC chief William Isaac weigh the pros and cons.

**SNIP**

WILLIAM ISAAC: Well, the federal government has a lot of say in how banks operate. All these big banks have scores of resident examiners who live there. I mean, they're there every day. They go to all the committee meetings and the board meetings. The government has a huge say in these banks, particularly when they start suffering some problems and are taking taxpayer money.

I couldn't disagree more with the statement that these banks are insolvent or in need of a takeover. They're not. They're suffering through a very difficult economy, and, frankly, they're holding up pretty well.

I think those banks today are in better shape than the banks that we dealt with in the 1980s. We had 3,000 banks fail in the 1980s. And if we had -- if we had had mark-to-market accounting -- and that's where the SEC requires these banks to mark down marketable assets to whatever the current market price is -- if we had had that in the 1980s, every one of the major banks would have failed, absolutely.

And these banks are under very difficult circumstances, and I think they're holding up pretty well. They do need some help. We've got to help them get through this period. And the way to do that is to keep on putting capital in.

I'm not worried about subsidizing shareholders. My goodness, the shareholders of Citibank, for example, have gone from $300 billion in market cap to maybe $5 billion or $10 billion today. They've suffered a lot of pain, and those shareholders are you and me. We all have them in our 401(k)s. They were conservative investments.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 401k; banks; meltdown; nationalization
Nationalization maybe a backdoor way to get control of that 401k loot. Just beware.
1 posted on 02/25/2009 5:39:29 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Task for Feb 24: Tell everyone that nationalization of banks is not being considered.

Task for Feb 25: Begin media campaign to promote the need for nationalization of banks.

2 posted on 02/25/2009 5:41:48 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’m firmly convinced that it is. The ‘Rats are RUTHLESS with our money, and they’ll rob us at gunpoint to get at our assets. They’re like junkies!


3 posted on 02/25/2009 5:42:20 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nationalization won’t end with the banks.


4 posted on 02/25/2009 5:44:49 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson