[Lurking Libertarian]

Is this Berg’s case or Orly’s?
Either way, the judge doesn’t sound pleased with the plaintiffs.

[MindBender26]

This is a very strange order, apparently occasioned by very strange conduct on the part of the Plaintiff.

One does not F with federal judges.

[Eagle50AE]

If somebody would explain this to my country a** , I would sure appreciate it ,,

no speaka lawyereze

[luv2ndamend]

more here

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3890

[Faith]

Good grief. We can’t afford to mess around! Someone’s head should roll.

[PAR35]

Those of us that got flamed for our comments about the plaintiff’s case and its chances seem to be getting vindicated.

[Polarik]

Ha ha. Not funny.

[Sibre Fan]

UPDATE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DISCHARGED

Just saw on another board:

"Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss [#13] was illegible on most of the Court's computers, as was plaintiff's response to the Court's order to show cause [#15], because plaintiff filed documents scanned with resolutions so fine that they overwhelmed the Court's CM/ECF system. On the Court's website, go to ECF Filing Pointers and then to Attorney's Checklist, for instructions. The Court's order to show cause [#14] is discharged."

[rxsid]

What, exactly, does this mean for the case?

"UPDATE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DISCHARGED"

It's time to move to the appeals level?

[AlexW]

I have been lurking on some TOPIX forums...Yes, I know, it is like the lowest of the low, but sometimes fun.
I drive them crazy with www.Obamacrimes.com
They rant that the BC has been posted everywhere.
They have no clue.

[Red Steel]

Berg responded. The follow up thread to this one:

Hollister v. Soetoro (aka Obama) Update to Order to Show Cause

[FreeManN]

Here is the Law Read it for yourself:
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C115.txt
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE
ACTIVITIES
Sec. 2387. Activities affecting armed forces generally
-STATUTE-
(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or
influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:
(1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes
or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny,
or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or
(2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written
or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges
insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States -Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his
conviction. (b) For the purposes of this section, the
term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States,
the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy
Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is
commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel. ]

***********************************************************

And this is what Orly allegedly said to Military.com about her knowledge of said Law:

California dentist turned attorney Orly Taitz, who has brought the lawsuit, told Military.com Tuesday that it is her “understanding that there will not be a serious consequence to his career [for his statements], but I don’t know for sure.”

http://www.military.com/news/article/February-2009/officer-calls-obama-usurper-imposter-president.html?col=1186032325324

At the very least Orly owes a duty to her clients to posts said Laws on her Blog and state her understanding of said Laws.