Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HerrBlucher
Well, technically I suppose. I guess I could have said "the article doesn't say but I would bet dollars to doughnuts that the woman is an athiest so why should she be concerned about morality......." That too would have achieved the goal of getting an athiest/morality discussion going, and, met the "honest debate" standard. Or, more specifically, the introduction into the debate would have met the standard.

Intentionally trying to take the discussion off topic isn't a particularly honest tactic, either. IMHO.

44 posted on 02/26/2009 12:40:57 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
Intentionally trying to take the discussion off topic isn't a particularly honest tactic, either. IMHO

Well excuuuuuuussssse meeeeeeee!

All kidding aside, keep in mind that my first post was to #3 in which the issue of morality was raised. Therefore I was "on topic" with respect to that post.

46 posted on 02/26/2009 1:06:52 PM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson